Ālayavijñāna from a Practical Point of View

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In 1987, Lambert Schmithausen published an important extensive monograph on the origin of ālayavijñāna (Ālayavijñāna: On the Origin and the Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogācāra Philosophy). In his opinion, the introduction of ālayavijñāna was closely linked to nirodhasamāpatti, but it was not meditative experience itself that directly lead to the introduction of this new concept. Rather, according to Schmithausen, it was dogmatic speculation on a sūtra passage about nirodhasamāpatti. My own hypothesis is that the introduction of ālayavijñāna was more directly based on meditative experiences. Focusing on the “Proof Portion” of the Viniścayasaṃgrahaṇī of the Yogācārabhūmi, the present paper examines this hypothesis. My examination reveals that ālayavijñāna is the physiological basis of the body, and as such it is correlated to the state of the body and mind. When one’s body and mind are transformed from an inert to a well-functioning state through meditative practice, the transformation seems to hinge on the transformation of ālayavijñāna itself. It appears that Yogācāra meditators intuitively realized this mechanism at the stage of darśanamārga. This paper also responds to some points raised by Schmithausen on my hypothesis in his recent monograph on early Yogācāra (The Genesis of Yogācāra-Vijñānavāda: Responses and Reflections, 2014). Through these discussions, this paper sheds light on the importance of the correlation between body and mind in meditative contexts and proposes that this was the key issue in the introduction of the ālayavijñāna theory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-319
Number of pages37
JournalJournal of Indian Philosophy
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Apr 1

Fingerprint

dogmatics
speculation
experience
examination
Monographs
philosophy
Hinge
Speculation
Genesis
Dogmatics
Philosophy

Keywords

  • dauṣṭhulya
  • ekayogakṣema
  • mind-body correlation
  • praśrabdhi
  • Yogācārabhūmi
  • ālayavijñāna

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Ālayavijñāna from a Practical Point of View. / Yamabe, Nobuyoshi.

In: Journal of Indian Philosophy, Vol. 46, No. 2, 01.04.2018, p. 283-319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0dc7440b31304fefaeaa4c0325c49b70,
title = "Ālayavij{\~n}āna from a Practical Point of View",
abstract = "In 1987, Lambert Schmithausen published an important extensive monograph on the origin of ālayavij{\~n}āna (Ālayavij{\~n}āna: On the Origin and the Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogācāra Philosophy). In his opinion, the introduction of ālayavij{\~n}āna was closely linked to nirodhasamāpatti, but it was not meditative experience itself that directly lead to the introduction of this new concept. Rather, according to Schmithausen, it was dogmatic speculation on a sūtra passage about nirodhasamāpatti. My own hypothesis is that the introduction of ālayavij{\~n}āna was more directly based on meditative experiences. Focusing on the “Proof Portion” of the Viniścayasaṃgrahaṇī of the Yogācārabhūmi, the present paper examines this hypothesis. My examination reveals that ālayavij{\~n}āna is the physiological basis of the body, and as such it is correlated to the state of the body and mind. When one’s body and mind are transformed from an inert to a well-functioning state through meditative practice, the transformation seems to hinge on the transformation of ālayavij{\~n}āna itself. It appears that Yogācāra meditators intuitively realized this mechanism at the stage of darśanamārga. This paper also responds to some points raised by Schmithausen on my hypothesis in his recent monograph on early Yogācāra (The Genesis of Yogācāra-Vij{\~n}ānavāda: Responses and Reflections, 2014). Through these discussions, this paper sheds light on the importance of the correlation between body and mind in meditative contexts and proposes that this was the key issue in the introduction of the ālayavij{\~n}āna theory.",
keywords = "dauṣṭhulya, ekayogakṣema, mind-body correlation, praśrabdhi, Yogācārabhūmi, ālayavij{\~n}āna",
author = "Nobuyoshi Yamabe",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10781-018-9347-5",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "283--319",
journal = "Journal of Indian Philosophy",
issn = "0022-1791",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ālayavijñāna from a Practical Point of View

AU - Yamabe, Nobuyoshi

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - In 1987, Lambert Schmithausen published an important extensive monograph on the origin of ālayavijñāna (Ālayavijñāna: On the Origin and the Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogācāra Philosophy). In his opinion, the introduction of ālayavijñāna was closely linked to nirodhasamāpatti, but it was not meditative experience itself that directly lead to the introduction of this new concept. Rather, according to Schmithausen, it was dogmatic speculation on a sūtra passage about nirodhasamāpatti. My own hypothesis is that the introduction of ālayavijñāna was more directly based on meditative experiences. Focusing on the “Proof Portion” of the Viniścayasaṃgrahaṇī of the Yogācārabhūmi, the present paper examines this hypothesis. My examination reveals that ālayavijñāna is the physiological basis of the body, and as such it is correlated to the state of the body and mind. When one’s body and mind are transformed from an inert to a well-functioning state through meditative practice, the transformation seems to hinge on the transformation of ālayavijñāna itself. It appears that Yogācāra meditators intuitively realized this mechanism at the stage of darśanamārga. This paper also responds to some points raised by Schmithausen on my hypothesis in his recent monograph on early Yogācāra (The Genesis of Yogācāra-Vijñānavāda: Responses and Reflections, 2014). Through these discussions, this paper sheds light on the importance of the correlation between body and mind in meditative contexts and proposes that this was the key issue in the introduction of the ālayavijñāna theory.

AB - In 1987, Lambert Schmithausen published an important extensive monograph on the origin of ālayavijñāna (Ālayavijñāna: On the Origin and the Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogācāra Philosophy). In his opinion, the introduction of ālayavijñāna was closely linked to nirodhasamāpatti, but it was not meditative experience itself that directly lead to the introduction of this new concept. Rather, according to Schmithausen, it was dogmatic speculation on a sūtra passage about nirodhasamāpatti. My own hypothesis is that the introduction of ālayavijñāna was more directly based on meditative experiences. Focusing on the “Proof Portion” of the Viniścayasaṃgrahaṇī of the Yogācārabhūmi, the present paper examines this hypothesis. My examination reveals that ālayavijñāna is the physiological basis of the body, and as such it is correlated to the state of the body and mind. When one’s body and mind are transformed from an inert to a well-functioning state through meditative practice, the transformation seems to hinge on the transformation of ālayavijñāna itself. It appears that Yogācāra meditators intuitively realized this mechanism at the stage of darśanamārga. This paper also responds to some points raised by Schmithausen on my hypothesis in his recent monograph on early Yogācāra (The Genesis of Yogācāra-Vijñānavāda: Responses and Reflections, 2014). Through these discussions, this paper sheds light on the importance of the correlation between body and mind in meditative contexts and proposes that this was the key issue in the introduction of the ālayavijñāna theory.

KW - dauṣṭhulya

KW - ekayogakṣema

KW - mind-body correlation

KW - praśrabdhi

KW - Yogācārabhūmi

KW - ālayavijñāna

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044050167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044050167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10781-018-9347-5

DO - 10.1007/s10781-018-9347-5

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 283

EP - 319

JO - Journal of Indian Philosophy

JF - Journal of Indian Philosophy

SN - 0022-1791

IS - 2

ER -