A comparable interpretability study between evaluation grid method, repertory grid method and typical free description

A study on qualitative research for getting evaluation term

Bo Peng, Takaya Kojima

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The purpose of this study is to explain the difference between evaluation grid method, repertory grid method, or triadic procedure technique, and typical free description. In order to explain the difference between these research methods, a comparison study on the interpretability or effectiveness, of the three research methods for comprehensive evaluation was performed. Furthermore, a classification study on the tendency of evaluation terms extracted from the three research methods was conducted. By doing a comprehensive evaluation based on an individual scaling method, the interpretability of each research method was explained. The result shows that evaluation grid method has high interpretability.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)661-668
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Environmental Engineering (Japan)
    Volume81
    Issue number726
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016 Aug 1

    Keywords

    • Attractive quality
    • Evaluation grid method
    • Individual scales method
    • Must-be quality
    • Repertory grid method
    • Triadic procedure technique

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Environmental Engineering

    Cite this

    @article{37a3e2f1ac444bdaa5498fbfffe63269,
    title = "A comparable interpretability study between evaluation grid method, repertory grid method and typical free description: A study on qualitative research for getting evaluation term",
    abstract = "The purpose of this study is to explain the difference between evaluation grid method, repertory grid method, or triadic procedure technique, and typical free description. In order to explain the difference between these research methods, a comparison study on the interpretability or effectiveness, of the three research methods for comprehensive evaluation was performed. Furthermore, a classification study on the tendency of evaluation terms extracted from the three research methods was conducted. By doing a comprehensive evaluation based on an individual scaling method, the interpretability of each research method was explained. The result shows that evaluation grid method has high interpretability.",
    keywords = "Attractive quality, Evaluation grid method, Individual scales method, Must-be quality, Repertory grid method, Triadic procedure technique",
    author = "Bo Peng and Takaya Kojima",
    year = "2016",
    month = "8",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.3130/aije.81.661",
    language = "English",
    volume = "81",
    pages = "661--668",
    journal = "Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE",
    issn = "1348-0685",
    publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
    number = "726",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A comparable interpretability study between evaluation grid method, repertory grid method and typical free description

    T2 - A study on qualitative research for getting evaluation term

    AU - Peng, Bo

    AU - Kojima, Takaya

    PY - 2016/8/1

    Y1 - 2016/8/1

    N2 - The purpose of this study is to explain the difference between evaluation grid method, repertory grid method, or triadic procedure technique, and typical free description. In order to explain the difference between these research methods, a comparison study on the interpretability or effectiveness, of the three research methods for comprehensive evaluation was performed. Furthermore, a classification study on the tendency of evaluation terms extracted from the three research methods was conducted. By doing a comprehensive evaluation based on an individual scaling method, the interpretability of each research method was explained. The result shows that evaluation grid method has high interpretability.

    AB - The purpose of this study is to explain the difference between evaluation grid method, repertory grid method, or triadic procedure technique, and typical free description. In order to explain the difference between these research methods, a comparison study on the interpretability or effectiveness, of the three research methods for comprehensive evaluation was performed. Furthermore, a classification study on the tendency of evaluation terms extracted from the three research methods was conducted. By doing a comprehensive evaluation based on an individual scaling method, the interpretability of each research method was explained. The result shows that evaluation grid method has high interpretability.

    KW - Attractive quality

    KW - Evaluation grid method

    KW - Individual scales method

    KW - Must-be quality

    KW - Repertory grid method

    KW - Triadic procedure technique

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984693490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984693490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.3130/aije.81.661

    DO - 10.3130/aije.81.661

    M3 - Article

    VL - 81

    SP - 661

    EP - 668

    JO - Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE

    JF - Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE

    SN - 1348-0685

    IS - 726

    ER -