A comparative study of LiNO3 and LiTFSI for the cycling performance of δ-MnO2 cathode in lithium-oxygen batteries

Norihiro Togasaki, Tadayoshi Gobara, Toshiyuki Momma, Tetsuya Osaka, Tomoko Numata

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lithium nitrate (LiNO3) is a potential option for the lithium salt in lithium-oxygen (Li-O2) batteries because it reduces the charging overpotential on carbon-based cathodes and protects the lithium metal anode from side reactions. However, the cycling stability of an electrolyte containing LiNO3 in the presence of cathode catalysts has not yet been studied. In this paper, we report an improvement in the cycling performance of δ-MnO2 cathodes in Li-O2 batteries using LiNO3 in comparison with that of batteries using lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in DMSO-based electrolytes. A >50% improvement in cycling performance is obtained from the electrolyte with LiNO3 versus that with LiTFSI. While the charge-discharge voltage profiles of the two electrolytes are identical to each other, the electrolyte containing LiNO3 produces less side products such as C-F group compounds, Li2SO3, and Li2SO4 on the cathode surface. This may be due to the electrochemically stable behavior of LiNO3 and the preventive effect of NO3 - on solvent decomposition, which stabilizes reactive species of superoxide radicals in the electrolyte.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)A2225-A2230
JournalJournal of the Electrochemical Society
Volume164
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Lithium
Electrolytes
Cathodes
Oxygen
Lithium batteries
Dimethyl Sulfoxide
Superoxides
Nitrates
bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide
Anodes
Carbon
Salts
Metals
Decomposition
Catalysts
Electric potential

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films
  • Electrochemistry
  • Materials Chemistry

Cite this

A comparative study of LiNO3 and LiTFSI for the cycling performance of δ-MnO2 cathode in lithium-oxygen batteries. / Togasaki, Norihiro; Gobara, Tadayoshi; Momma, Toshiyuki; Osaka, Tetsuya; Numata, Tomoko.

In: Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Vol. 164, No. 9, 01.01.2017, p. A2225-A2230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{71dc86cba12342a4942e2385b720a27e,
title = "A comparative study of LiNO3 and LiTFSI for the cycling performance of δ-MnO2 cathode in lithium-oxygen batteries",
abstract = "Lithium nitrate (LiNO3) is a potential option for the lithium salt in lithium-oxygen (Li-O2) batteries because it reduces the charging overpotential on carbon-based cathodes and protects the lithium metal anode from side reactions. However, the cycling stability of an electrolyte containing LiNO3 in the presence of cathode catalysts has not yet been studied. In this paper, we report an improvement in the cycling performance of δ-MnO2 cathodes in Li-O2 batteries using LiNO3 in comparison with that of batteries using lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in DMSO-based electrolytes. A >50{\%} improvement in cycling performance is obtained from the electrolyte with LiNO3 versus that with LiTFSI. While the charge-discharge voltage profiles of the two electrolytes are identical to each other, the electrolyte containing LiNO3 produces less side products such as C-F group compounds, Li2SO3, and Li2SO4 on the cathode surface. This may be due to the electrochemically stable behavior of LiNO3 and the preventive effect of NO3 - on solvent decomposition, which stabilizes reactive species of superoxide radicals in the electrolyte.",
author = "Norihiro Togasaki and Tadayoshi Gobara and Toshiyuki Momma and Tetsuya Osaka and Tomoko Numata",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1149/2.0051712jes",
language = "English",
volume = "164",
pages = "A2225--A2230",
journal = "Journal of the Electrochemical Society",
issn = "0013-4651",
publisher = "Electrochemical Society, Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of LiNO3 and LiTFSI for the cycling performance of δ-MnO2 cathode in lithium-oxygen batteries

AU - Togasaki, Norihiro

AU - Gobara, Tadayoshi

AU - Momma, Toshiyuki

AU - Osaka, Tetsuya

AU - Numata, Tomoko

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Lithium nitrate (LiNO3) is a potential option for the lithium salt in lithium-oxygen (Li-O2) batteries because it reduces the charging overpotential on carbon-based cathodes and protects the lithium metal anode from side reactions. However, the cycling stability of an electrolyte containing LiNO3 in the presence of cathode catalysts has not yet been studied. In this paper, we report an improvement in the cycling performance of δ-MnO2 cathodes in Li-O2 batteries using LiNO3 in comparison with that of batteries using lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in DMSO-based electrolytes. A >50% improvement in cycling performance is obtained from the electrolyte with LiNO3 versus that with LiTFSI. While the charge-discharge voltage profiles of the two electrolytes are identical to each other, the electrolyte containing LiNO3 produces less side products such as C-F group compounds, Li2SO3, and Li2SO4 on the cathode surface. This may be due to the electrochemically stable behavior of LiNO3 and the preventive effect of NO3 - on solvent decomposition, which stabilizes reactive species of superoxide radicals in the electrolyte.

AB - Lithium nitrate (LiNO3) is a potential option for the lithium salt in lithium-oxygen (Li-O2) batteries because it reduces the charging overpotential on carbon-based cathodes and protects the lithium metal anode from side reactions. However, the cycling stability of an electrolyte containing LiNO3 in the presence of cathode catalysts has not yet been studied. In this paper, we report an improvement in the cycling performance of δ-MnO2 cathodes in Li-O2 batteries using LiNO3 in comparison with that of batteries using lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in DMSO-based electrolytes. A >50% improvement in cycling performance is obtained from the electrolyte with LiNO3 versus that with LiTFSI. While the charge-discharge voltage profiles of the two electrolytes are identical to each other, the electrolyte containing LiNO3 produces less side products such as C-F group compounds, Li2SO3, and Li2SO4 on the cathode surface. This may be due to the electrochemically stable behavior of LiNO3 and the preventive effect of NO3 - on solvent decomposition, which stabilizes reactive species of superoxide radicals in the electrolyte.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040783719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040783719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1149/2.0051712jes

DO - 10.1149/2.0051712jes

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85040783719

VL - 164

SP - A2225-A2230

JO - Journal of the Electrochemical Society

JF - Journal of the Electrochemical Society

SN - 0013-4651

IS - 9

ER -