A future of comparative film studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Paul Willemen proposes the concept of comparative film studies, as an immanent critique of film studies, as an academic discipline-in the development of which the US has played a central role. Is comparative film studies equally relevant for film scholars working outside Euro-American academia? To what extent can the idea of comparative film studies play the similarly critical function in the non-Euro-American context? This essay is an attempt to answer these questions, not necessarily by closely explicating what Willemen means by comparative film studies but by re-interpreting or even "misreading" this concept while at the same time trying to remain faithful to the radical spirit of his argument. Using the state of film scholarship in Japan as an example, the essay explores various implications of comparative film studies for academics situated in the place where the discipline of film studies is not firmly established. It particularly focuses on the connections between the global hegemony of US-centered film studies and the significance of English as a privileged medium of scholarly output, and then speculates on how the subversion of this hegemony can be articulated to the re-interpreted notion of comparative film studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-61
Number of pages8
JournalInter-Asia Cultural Studies
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Mar

Fingerprint

hegemony
subversion
Japan

Keywords

  • discipline
  • Film studies
  • globalization
  • national cinema
  • university
  • world cinema

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

A future of comparative film studies. / Yoshimoto, Mitsuhiro.

In: Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, 03.2013, p. 54-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f4a944fc5ece4b68b6d2040bb316f110,
title = "A future of comparative film studies",
abstract = "Paul Willemen proposes the concept of comparative film studies, as an immanent critique of film studies, as an academic discipline-in the development of which the US has played a central role. Is comparative film studies equally relevant for film scholars working outside Euro-American academia? To what extent can the idea of comparative film studies play the similarly critical function in the non-Euro-American context? This essay is an attempt to answer these questions, not necessarily by closely explicating what Willemen means by comparative film studies but by re-interpreting or even {"}misreading{"} this concept while at the same time trying to remain faithful to the radical spirit of his argument. Using the state of film scholarship in Japan as an example, the essay explores various implications of comparative film studies for academics situated in the place where the discipline of film studies is not firmly established. It particularly focuses on the connections between the global hegemony of US-centered film studies and the significance of English as a privileged medium of scholarly output, and then speculates on how the subversion of this hegemony can be articulated to the re-interpreted notion of comparative film studies.",
keywords = "discipline, Film studies, globalization, national cinema, university, world cinema",
author = "Mitsuhiro Yoshimoto",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/14649373.2013.745972",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "54--61",
journal = "Inter-Asia Cultural Studies",
issn = "1464-9373",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A future of comparative film studies

AU - Yoshimoto, Mitsuhiro

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Paul Willemen proposes the concept of comparative film studies, as an immanent critique of film studies, as an academic discipline-in the development of which the US has played a central role. Is comparative film studies equally relevant for film scholars working outside Euro-American academia? To what extent can the idea of comparative film studies play the similarly critical function in the non-Euro-American context? This essay is an attempt to answer these questions, not necessarily by closely explicating what Willemen means by comparative film studies but by re-interpreting or even "misreading" this concept while at the same time trying to remain faithful to the radical spirit of his argument. Using the state of film scholarship in Japan as an example, the essay explores various implications of comparative film studies for academics situated in the place where the discipline of film studies is not firmly established. It particularly focuses on the connections between the global hegemony of US-centered film studies and the significance of English as a privileged medium of scholarly output, and then speculates on how the subversion of this hegemony can be articulated to the re-interpreted notion of comparative film studies.

AB - Paul Willemen proposes the concept of comparative film studies, as an immanent critique of film studies, as an academic discipline-in the development of which the US has played a central role. Is comparative film studies equally relevant for film scholars working outside Euro-American academia? To what extent can the idea of comparative film studies play the similarly critical function in the non-Euro-American context? This essay is an attempt to answer these questions, not necessarily by closely explicating what Willemen means by comparative film studies but by re-interpreting or even "misreading" this concept while at the same time trying to remain faithful to the radical spirit of his argument. Using the state of film scholarship in Japan as an example, the essay explores various implications of comparative film studies for academics situated in the place where the discipline of film studies is not firmly established. It particularly focuses on the connections between the global hegemony of US-centered film studies and the significance of English as a privileged medium of scholarly output, and then speculates on how the subversion of this hegemony can be articulated to the re-interpreted notion of comparative film studies.

KW - discipline

KW - Film studies

KW - globalization

KW - national cinema

KW - university

KW - world cinema

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875380034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875380034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14649373.2013.745972

DO - 10.1080/14649373.2013.745972

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84875380034

VL - 14

SP - 54

EP - 61

JO - Inter-Asia Cultural Studies

JF - Inter-Asia Cultural Studies

SN - 1464-9373

IS - 1

ER -