A game-theoretic solution to the inconsistency between Thrasymachus and Glaucon in Plato's republic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In Book I of Plato's Republic, Thrasymachus contends two major claims: (i) justice is the adaantage of the stronger, and (ii) justice is the good of the other, while injustice is to one's own profit and adaantage. In the beginning of Book II, Glaucon self-proclaims that he will be representing Thrasymachus' claims in a better way, and proaides a story of how justice has originated from a state-of-nature situation. Howeaer, Glaucon's story of the origin of justice has an implication that justice is the adaantage of the weak rather than the stronger. This is inconsistent with Thrasymachus' first claim, which states that justice is the adaantage of the stronger. This is a problem for Glaucon since he is supposed to be representing Thrasymachus' original claims in a better way. In the present article, I proaide two solutions to this puzzle with the help of elementary game theory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-410
Number of pages28
JournalEthical Perspectives
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Inconsistency
Justice
Plato's Republic
Game Theory
Profit
State of Nature
Injustice

Keywords

  • Game theory
  • Glaucon
  • Glaucon's challenge
  • Prisoner's dilemma
  • Republic
  • Thrasymachus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

A game-theoretic solution to the inconsistency between Thrasymachus and Glaucon in Plato's republic. / Chung, Hun.

In: Ethical Perspectives, Vol. 23, No. 3, 01.01.2016, p. 383-410.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9c774916ca5f4feebac8e7caba3a1a13,
title = "A game-theoretic solution to the inconsistency between Thrasymachus and Glaucon in Plato's republic",
abstract = "In Book I of Plato's Republic, Thrasymachus contends two major claims: (i) justice is the adaantage of the stronger, and (ii) justice is the good of the other, while injustice is to one's own profit and adaantage. In the beginning of Book II, Glaucon self-proclaims that he will be representing Thrasymachus' claims in a better way, and proaides a story of how justice has originated from a state-of-nature situation. Howeaer, Glaucon's story of the origin of justice has an implication that justice is the adaantage of the weak rather than the stronger. This is inconsistent with Thrasymachus' first claim, which states that justice is the adaantage of the stronger. This is a problem for Glaucon since he is supposed to be representing Thrasymachus' original claims in a better way. In the present article, I proaide two solutions to this puzzle with the help of elementary game theory.",
keywords = "Game theory, Glaucon, Glaucon's challenge, Prisoner's dilemma, Republic, Thrasymachus",
author = "Hun Chung",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2143/EP.23.3.3170038",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "383--410",
journal = "Ethical Perspectives",
issn = "1370-0049",
publisher = "European Centre for Ethics",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A game-theoretic solution to the inconsistency between Thrasymachus and Glaucon in Plato's republic

AU - Chung, Hun

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - In Book I of Plato's Republic, Thrasymachus contends two major claims: (i) justice is the adaantage of the stronger, and (ii) justice is the good of the other, while injustice is to one's own profit and adaantage. In the beginning of Book II, Glaucon self-proclaims that he will be representing Thrasymachus' claims in a better way, and proaides a story of how justice has originated from a state-of-nature situation. Howeaer, Glaucon's story of the origin of justice has an implication that justice is the adaantage of the weak rather than the stronger. This is inconsistent with Thrasymachus' first claim, which states that justice is the adaantage of the stronger. This is a problem for Glaucon since he is supposed to be representing Thrasymachus' original claims in a better way. In the present article, I proaide two solutions to this puzzle with the help of elementary game theory.

AB - In Book I of Plato's Republic, Thrasymachus contends two major claims: (i) justice is the adaantage of the stronger, and (ii) justice is the good of the other, while injustice is to one's own profit and adaantage. In the beginning of Book II, Glaucon self-proclaims that he will be representing Thrasymachus' claims in a better way, and proaides a story of how justice has originated from a state-of-nature situation. Howeaer, Glaucon's story of the origin of justice has an implication that justice is the adaantage of the weak rather than the stronger. This is inconsistent with Thrasymachus' first claim, which states that justice is the adaantage of the stronger. This is a problem for Glaucon since he is supposed to be representing Thrasymachus' original claims in a better way. In the present article, I proaide two solutions to this puzzle with the help of elementary game theory.

KW - Game theory

KW - Glaucon

KW - Glaucon's challenge

KW - Prisoner's dilemma

KW - Republic

KW - Thrasymachus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997327897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84997327897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2143/EP.23.3.3170038

DO - 10.2143/EP.23.3.3170038

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84997327897

VL - 23

SP - 383

EP - 410

JO - Ethical Perspectives

JF - Ethical Perspectives

SN - 1370-0049

IS - 3

ER -