A Property-Rights Approach to Understanding Regulations and Practices in Community-Based Forest Management

Comparison of Three Systems in the Philippines

Ei Ei Swe Hlaing, Makoto Inoue, Juan M. Pulhin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Decentralizing property rights from state control to user communities has encouraged people's participation in forest management. Relatively few studies, however, examine the forest regulations required for exercising such property rights. To address this issue, Schlager and Ostrom's 'bundle of rights' framework was used to examine various forms of property rights and regulations in three systems of community-based forest management. The field research was undertaken in the northern Philippines, using eight cases of community-based forest management at sites in the provinces of Nueva Vizcaya and Ifugao. Local communities were found to informally retain the authority to create locally crafted property rights and regulations in a central government-initiated program. While forest regulations and practices prescribed at the national level have improved forest conditions, the flow of forest benefits to communities has been limited because of decentralization without devolution of authority. A case study of a site initiated by a local government indicated that the transfer of responsibility from the central government to local government units can create more favourable conditions for the flow of forest benefits to communities. But due to a lack of clarity about devolution of cutting permits and about the locations of afforested critical watershed areas, authorized local users lose their authorization. When forest is managed traditionally, communities can have more assured rights than in government-initiated programs, particularly in relation to tree ownership. This is because individuals have the authority to devise collective-choice rights as well as operational rights.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)579-596
Number of pages18
JournalSmall-scale Forestry
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Dec
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

property rights
Philippines
forest management
forestry law
governmental programs and projects
local government
devolution
politics
ownership
case studies
decentralization
regulation
comparison
watershed
rights

Keywords

  • Authority
  • Decentralization
  • Devolution
  • Economic impact
  • Forest impact

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry

Cite this

A Property-Rights Approach to Understanding Regulations and Practices in Community-Based Forest Management : Comparison of Three Systems in the Philippines. / Hlaing, Ei Ei Swe; Inoue, Makoto; Pulhin, Juan M.

In: Small-scale Forestry, Vol. 12, No. 4, 12.2013, p. 579-596.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{55639e05165a49a78f9db4fbda9bbcc2,
title = "A Property-Rights Approach to Understanding Regulations and Practices in Community-Based Forest Management: Comparison of Three Systems in the Philippines",
abstract = "Decentralizing property rights from state control to user communities has encouraged people's participation in forest management. Relatively few studies, however, examine the forest regulations required for exercising such property rights. To address this issue, Schlager and Ostrom's 'bundle of rights' framework was used to examine various forms of property rights and regulations in three systems of community-based forest management. The field research was undertaken in the northern Philippines, using eight cases of community-based forest management at sites in the provinces of Nueva Vizcaya and Ifugao. Local communities were found to informally retain the authority to create locally crafted property rights and regulations in a central government-initiated program. While forest regulations and practices prescribed at the national level have improved forest conditions, the flow of forest benefits to communities has been limited because of decentralization without devolution of authority. A case study of a site initiated by a local government indicated that the transfer of responsibility from the central government to local government units can create more favourable conditions for the flow of forest benefits to communities. But due to a lack of clarity about devolution of cutting permits and about the locations of afforested critical watershed areas, authorized local users lose their authorization. When forest is managed traditionally, communities can have more assured rights than in government-initiated programs, particularly in relation to tree ownership. This is because individuals have the authority to devise collective-choice rights as well as operational rights.",
keywords = "Authority, Decentralization, Devolution, Economic impact, Forest impact",
author = "Hlaing, {Ei Ei Swe} and Makoto Inoue and Pulhin, {Juan M.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s11842-012-9232-0",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "579--596",
journal = "Small-scale Forestry",
issn = "1873-7617",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Property-Rights Approach to Understanding Regulations and Practices in Community-Based Forest Management

T2 - Comparison of Three Systems in the Philippines

AU - Hlaing, Ei Ei Swe

AU - Inoue, Makoto

AU - Pulhin, Juan M.

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Decentralizing property rights from state control to user communities has encouraged people's participation in forest management. Relatively few studies, however, examine the forest regulations required for exercising such property rights. To address this issue, Schlager and Ostrom's 'bundle of rights' framework was used to examine various forms of property rights and regulations in three systems of community-based forest management. The field research was undertaken in the northern Philippines, using eight cases of community-based forest management at sites in the provinces of Nueva Vizcaya and Ifugao. Local communities were found to informally retain the authority to create locally crafted property rights and regulations in a central government-initiated program. While forest regulations and practices prescribed at the national level have improved forest conditions, the flow of forest benefits to communities has been limited because of decentralization without devolution of authority. A case study of a site initiated by a local government indicated that the transfer of responsibility from the central government to local government units can create more favourable conditions for the flow of forest benefits to communities. But due to a lack of clarity about devolution of cutting permits and about the locations of afforested critical watershed areas, authorized local users lose their authorization. When forest is managed traditionally, communities can have more assured rights than in government-initiated programs, particularly in relation to tree ownership. This is because individuals have the authority to devise collective-choice rights as well as operational rights.

AB - Decentralizing property rights from state control to user communities has encouraged people's participation in forest management. Relatively few studies, however, examine the forest regulations required for exercising such property rights. To address this issue, Schlager and Ostrom's 'bundle of rights' framework was used to examine various forms of property rights and regulations in three systems of community-based forest management. The field research was undertaken in the northern Philippines, using eight cases of community-based forest management at sites in the provinces of Nueva Vizcaya and Ifugao. Local communities were found to informally retain the authority to create locally crafted property rights and regulations in a central government-initiated program. While forest regulations and practices prescribed at the national level have improved forest conditions, the flow of forest benefits to communities has been limited because of decentralization without devolution of authority. A case study of a site initiated by a local government indicated that the transfer of responsibility from the central government to local government units can create more favourable conditions for the flow of forest benefits to communities. But due to a lack of clarity about devolution of cutting permits and about the locations of afforested critical watershed areas, authorized local users lose their authorization. When forest is managed traditionally, communities can have more assured rights than in government-initiated programs, particularly in relation to tree ownership. This is because individuals have the authority to devise collective-choice rights as well as operational rights.

KW - Authority

KW - Decentralization

KW - Devolution

KW - Economic impact

KW - Forest impact

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888044779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888044779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11842-012-9232-0

DO - 10.1007/s11842-012-9232-0

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 579

EP - 596

JO - Small-scale Forestry

JF - Small-scale Forestry

SN - 1873-7617

IS - 4

ER -