An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm

Hiroaki Masaki*, Noriyoshi Takasawa, Katuo Yamazaki

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility task using event-related potentials (ERPs). Ten participants were instructed to respond to stimulus color with the left or right middle finger. Red or blue arrows pointed in the same direction as the response hand on congruent trials and pointed in the opposite direction on incongruent trials. Neutral trials were red or blue horizontal bars. Reaction times (RTs) to incongruent stimuli were significantly longer than RTs to congruent stimuli. The peak latency of the P300 for incongruent stimuli was significantly longer than that for congruent stimuli. In addition, onset of stimulus-locked lateralized readiness potential (LRPs) was significantly later for incongruent stimuli than for congruent stimuli. However, electromyogram (EMG)-locked LRPs for incongruent stimuli showed incorrect preparation. These results suggest that the interference effect might occur at the stage in which stimulus evaluation processes and response-related processes overlap.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)464-472
Number of pages9
JournalPsychophysiology
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Keywords

  • EMG-locked LRP
  • Lateralized readiness potential
  • P300
  • Simon effect
  • Stimulus-locked LRP
  • Stimulus-response compatibility
  • Stroop interference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neurology
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Biological Psychiatry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this