An empirical study of the SO2 allowance market

Effects of PUC regulations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates electric utility behavior under the SO2 allowance market in Phase I. The probit model shows that cost recovery rules promoted high sulfur coal usage for utilities located in states with coal mines. A simulation shows that protecting these local coal industry increased high sulfur coal usage by 50%. Another finding is that the uncertainty of PUC regulations pushed utilities from the allowance market toward fuel switching/blending. Since the second effect was stronger than the first, the overall PUC regulations contributed to an unexpectedly low allowance price at the beginning of Phase I.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-289
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Environmental Economics and Management
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002 Sep
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

market
sulfur
coal
coal industry
coal mine
cost
simulation
allowance
effect
regulation
Empirical study
price
Cost recovery
Simulation
Utility regulation
Probit model
Uncertainty
Electric utilities
Coal industry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

An empirical study of the SO2 allowance market : Effects of PUC regulations. / Arimura, Toshihide.

In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 44, No. 2, 09.2002, p. 271-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{55c7af973b0241cd8c25c2b9a589d63e,
title = "An empirical study of the SO2 allowance market: Effects of PUC regulations",
abstract = "This paper investigates electric utility behavior under the SO2 allowance market in Phase I. The probit model shows that cost recovery rules promoted high sulfur coal usage for utilities located in states with coal mines. A simulation shows that protecting these local coal industry increased high sulfur coal usage by 50{\%}. Another finding is that the uncertainty of PUC regulations pushed utilities from the allowance market toward fuel switching/blending. Since the second effect was stronger than the first, the overall PUC regulations contributed to an unexpectedly low allowance price at the beginning of Phase I.",
author = "Toshihide Arimura",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1006/jeem.2001.1202",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "271--289",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Economics and Management",
issn = "0095-0696",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An empirical study of the SO2 allowance market

T2 - Effects of PUC regulations

AU - Arimura, Toshihide

PY - 2002/9

Y1 - 2002/9

N2 - This paper investigates electric utility behavior under the SO2 allowance market in Phase I. The probit model shows that cost recovery rules promoted high sulfur coal usage for utilities located in states with coal mines. A simulation shows that protecting these local coal industry increased high sulfur coal usage by 50%. Another finding is that the uncertainty of PUC regulations pushed utilities from the allowance market toward fuel switching/blending. Since the second effect was stronger than the first, the overall PUC regulations contributed to an unexpectedly low allowance price at the beginning of Phase I.

AB - This paper investigates electric utility behavior under the SO2 allowance market in Phase I. The probit model shows that cost recovery rules promoted high sulfur coal usage for utilities located in states with coal mines. A simulation shows that protecting these local coal industry increased high sulfur coal usage by 50%. Another finding is that the uncertainty of PUC regulations pushed utilities from the allowance market toward fuel switching/blending. Since the second effect was stronger than the first, the overall PUC regulations contributed to an unexpectedly low allowance price at the beginning of Phase I.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036736390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036736390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/jeem.2001.1202

DO - 10.1006/jeem.2001.1202

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 271

EP - 289

JO - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

SN - 0095-0696

IS - 2

ER -