Assessing Outcomes of Teacher Education

Quantitative Case Studies From Individual Taiwanese and Japanese Teacher Training Institutions

Carrie Jia Li Huang, William L. Q. Oga Baldwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Much of the research on assessing and comparing teacher education has focused on schools of education in westernized contexts. While teacher training programs in East Asia have received comparatively less attention than those in North America, Europe, and Australia, they may also offer practical insight through their similarities and differences. This study reports on an international quantitative comparison of undergraduate teacher education outcomes at individual Japanese and Taiwanese universities of education, viewed from both students’ perspectives and outcomes on high-stakes qualification examinations. A sample of graduating students from one Japanese (n = 408) and one Taiwanese (n = 525) teacher training institution each completed surveys regarding the degree of preparation for teaching attributed to their undergraduate experience. Survey instruments were taken from previous research assessing teacher education programs. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated good fit for a three-factor model in both contexts, with factors including preparation for understanding and interacting with students, preparation for designing curriculum and instruction, and preparation for assuming in-school responsibilities. Subsequent MANOVA and univariate analyses indicated that the Taiwanese teacher training cohort perceived themselves significantly more prepared for teaching than the sample from the Japanese institution. Likewise, a larger portion from the Taiwanese institution chose to enter the teaching profession. Implications for teacher education practice based on institution- and policy-level differences are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)579-589
Number of pages11
JournalAsia-Pacific Education Researcher
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Dec 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

teacher training
teacher
education
Teaching
student
school
qualification
training program
profession
instruction
curriculum
responsibility
examination
university
experience

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Japan
  • Outcomes
  • Taiwan
  • Teacher education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{2ea81e2c9a1841e4ac9e30b2bc506cf0,
title = "Assessing Outcomes of Teacher Education: Quantitative Case Studies From Individual Taiwanese and Japanese Teacher Training Institutions",
abstract = "Much of the research on assessing and comparing teacher education has focused on schools of education in westernized contexts. While teacher training programs in East Asia have received comparatively less attention than those in North America, Europe, and Australia, they may also offer practical insight through their similarities and differences. This study reports on an international quantitative comparison of undergraduate teacher education outcomes at individual Japanese and Taiwanese universities of education, viewed from both students’ perspectives and outcomes on high-stakes qualification examinations. A sample of graduating students from one Japanese (n = 408) and one Taiwanese (n = 525) teacher training institution each completed surveys regarding the degree of preparation for teaching attributed to their undergraduate experience. Survey instruments were taken from previous research assessing teacher education programs. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated good fit for a three-factor model in both contexts, with factors including preparation for understanding and interacting with students, preparation for designing curriculum and instruction, and preparation for assuming in-school responsibilities. Subsequent MANOVA and univariate analyses indicated that the Taiwanese teacher training cohort perceived themselves significantly more prepared for teaching than the sample from the Japanese institution. Likewise, a larger portion from the Taiwanese institution chose to enter the teaching profession. Implications for teacher education practice based on institution- and policy-level differences are discussed.",
keywords = "Assessment, Japan, Outcomes, Taiwan, Teacher education",
author = "Huang, {Carrie Jia Li} and {Oga Baldwin}, {William L. Q.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40299-014-0203-4",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "579--589",
journal = "Asia-Pacific Education Researcher",
issn = "0119-5646",
publisher = "De la Salle University",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing Outcomes of Teacher Education

T2 - Quantitative Case Studies From Individual Taiwanese and Japanese Teacher Training Institutions

AU - Huang, Carrie Jia Li

AU - Oga Baldwin, William L. Q.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Much of the research on assessing and comparing teacher education has focused on schools of education in westernized contexts. While teacher training programs in East Asia have received comparatively less attention than those in North America, Europe, and Australia, they may also offer practical insight through their similarities and differences. This study reports on an international quantitative comparison of undergraduate teacher education outcomes at individual Japanese and Taiwanese universities of education, viewed from both students’ perspectives and outcomes on high-stakes qualification examinations. A sample of graduating students from one Japanese (n = 408) and one Taiwanese (n = 525) teacher training institution each completed surveys regarding the degree of preparation for teaching attributed to their undergraduate experience. Survey instruments were taken from previous research assessing teacher education programs. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated good fit for a three-factor model in both contexts, with factors including preparation for understanding and interacting with students, preparation for designing curriculum and instruction, and preparation for assuming in-school responsibilities. Subsequent MANOVA and univariate analyses indicated that the Taiwanese teacher training cohort perceived themselves significantly more prepared for teaching than the sample from the Japanese institution. Likewise, a larger portion from the Taiwanese institution chose to enter the teaching profession. Implications for teacher education practice based on institution- and policy-level differences are discussed.

AB - Much of the research on assessing and comparing teacher education has focused on schools of education in westernized contexts. While teacher training programs in East Asia have received comparatively less attention than those in North America, Europe, and Australia, they may also offer practical insight through their similarities and differences. This study reports on an international quantitative comparison of undergraduate teacher education outcomes at individual Japanese and Taiwanese universities of education, viewed from both students’ perspectives and outcomes on high-stakes qualification examinations. A sample of graduating students from one Japanese (n = 408) and one Taiwanese (n = 525) teacher training institution each completed surveys regarding the degree of preparation for teaching attributed to their undergraduate experience. Survey instruments were taken from previous research assessing teacher education programs. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated good fit for a three-factor model in both contexts, with factors including preparation for understanding and interacting with students, preparation for designing curriculum and instruction, and preparation for assuming in-school responsibilities. Subsequent MANOVA and univariate analyses indicated that the Taiwanese teacher training cohort perceived themselves significantly more prepared for teaching than the sample from the Japanese institution. Likewise, a larger portion from the Taiwanese institution chose to enter the teaching profession. Implications for teacher education practice based on institution- and policy-level differences are discussed.

KW - Assessment

KW - Japan

KW - Outcomes

KW - Taiwan

KW - Teacher education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945545571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945545571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40299-014-0203-4

DO - 10.1007/s40299-014-0203-4

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 579

EP - 589

JO - Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

JF - Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

SN - 0119-5646

IS - 4

ER -