Abstract
Prior research has shown that Japanese blame organizational leaders more harshly than Americans: Americans blame organizational leaders based on the behavior of individual leaders, whereas Japanese blame leaders based both on the behavior of individual leaders and that of the organization. This finding can be explained by a cultural difference in cognitive orientation to focus on the causal influence of groups but also by a cultural difference in value to subordinate individual goals to group goals. By asking Japanese and American respondents to make credit judgments for positive organizational incidents, the current work tests these two rival explanations. Results support the view that group-based crediting occurs because of perceivers' cognitive orientation to perceive group causality. Implications of this cultural difference and the judgmental processes are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 899-914 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 Aug |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- credit assignment
- cultural difference
- responsibility attribution
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Cultural Studies
- Anthropology
Cite this
Assigning Credit to Organizational Leaders : How Japanese and Americans Differ. / Zemba, Yuriko; Young, Maia J.
In: Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 43, No. 6, 08.2012, p. 899-914.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Assigning Credit to Organizational Leaders
T2 - How Japanese and Americans Differ
AU - Zemba, Yuriko
AU - Young, Maia J.
PY - 2012/8
Y1 - 2012/8
N2 - Prior research has shown that Japanese blame organizational leaders more harshly than Americans: Americans blame organizational leaders based on the behavior of individual leaders, whereas Japanese blame leaders based both on the behavior of individual leaders and that of the organization. This finding can be explained by a cultural difference in cognitive orientation to focus on the causal influence of groups but also by a cultural difference in value to subordinate individual goals to group goals. By asking Japanese and American respondents to make credit judgments for positive organizational incidents, the current work tests these two rival explanations. Results support the view that group-based crediting occurs because of perceivers' cognitive orientation to perceive group causality. Implications of this cultural difference and the judgmental processes are discussed.
AB - Prior research has shown that Japanese blame organizational leaders more harshly than Americans: Americans blame organizational leaders based on the behavior of individual leaders, whereas Japanese blame leaders based both on the behavior of individual leaders and that of the organization. This finding can be explained by a cultural difference in cognitive orientation to focus on the causal influence of groups but also by a cultural difference in value to subordinate individual goals to group goals. By asking Japanese and American respondents to make credit judgments for positive organizational incidents, the current work tests these two rival explanations. Results support the view that group-based crediting occurs because of perceivers' cognitive orientation to perceive group causality. Implications of this cultural difference and the judgmental processes are discussed.
KW - credit assignment
KW - cultural difference
KW - responsibility attribution
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863516710&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863516710&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0022022111413275
DO - 10.1177/0022022111413275
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84863516710
VL - 43
SP - 899
EP - 914
JO - Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
JF - Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
SN - 0022-0221
IS - 6
ER -