TY - GEN
T1 - Assisting pictogram selection with semantic interpretation
AU - Cho, Heeryon
AU - Ishida, Toru
AU - Takasaki, Toshiyuki
AU - Oyama, Satoshi
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Participants at both end of the communication channel must share common pictogram interpretation to communicate. However, because pictogram interpretation can be ambiguous, pictogram communication can sometimes be difficult. To assist human task of selecting pictograms more likely to be interpreted as intended, we propose a semantic relevance measure which calculates how relevant a pictogram is to a given interpretation. The proposed measure uses pictogram interpretations and frequencies gathered from a web survey to define probability and similarity measurement of interpretation words. Moreover, the proposed measure is applied to categorized pictogram interpretations to enhance retrieval performance. Five pictogram categories are created using the five first level categories defined in the Concept Dictionary of EDR Electronic Dictionary. Retrieval performance among not-categorized interpretations, categorized and not-weighted interpretations, and categorized and weighted interpretations using semantic relevance measure were compared, and the categorized and weighted semantic relevance retrieval approach exhibited the highest F 1 measure and recall.
AB - Participants at both end of the communication channel must share common pictogram interpretation to communicate. However, because pictogram interpretation can be ambiguous, pictogram communication can sometimes be difficult. To assist human task of selecting pictograms more likely to be interpreted as intended, we propose a semantic relevance measure which calculates how relevant a pictogram is to a given interpretation. The proposed measure uses pictogram interpretations and frequencies gathered from a web survey to define probability and similarity measurement of interpretation words. Moreover, the proposed measure is applied to categorized pictogram interpretations to enhance retrieval performance. Five pictogram categories are created using the five first level categories defined in the Concept Dictionary of EDR Electronic Dictionary. Retrieval performance among not-categorized interpretations, categorized and not-weighted interpretations, and categorized and weighted interpretations using semantic relevance measure were compared, and the categorized and weighted semantic relevance retrieval approach exhibited the highest F 1 measure and recall.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45449098445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45449098445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-540-68234-9_8
DO - 10.1007/978-3-540-68234-9_8
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:45449098445
SN - 3540682333
SN - 9783540682332
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 65
EP - 79
BT - The Semantic Web
T2 - 5th European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2008
Y2 - 1 June 2008 through 5 June 2008
ER -