Authority and communication in firms

Hajime Katayama, Kieron J. Meagher, Andrew Wait

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We show that decision making in organizations is typically more complicated than simply choosing either to delegate or to centralize. Firms have to consider not only the level at which a decision is made (authority location) but also how many people are involved (authority diffusion), and the type of communication. Utilizing a unique data set, we estimate a latent-class model to identify frequently adopted combinations of decision-making rights and communication across different hierarchical levels relating to the implementation of a significant change. We identify four typical authority/communication structures that can be loosely categorized as: authoritarian centralization; team decision making; consultative centralization; and decentralization. We then explore the relationships between these four authority/communication structures and other characteristics of the firm, such as the size of the organization, worker skills, long-term employer-employee relationships, individual and group incentives and how close the firm is to the productivity frontier. These results are broadly consistent with recent advances in theory, although no one model is rich enough to fully describe all our findings.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2018 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Communication
Authority
Decision making
Communication structure
Centralization
Employers
Workers
Decentralization
Productivity
Team decision making
Employees
Latent class model
Group incentives

Keywords

  • Authority
  • Centralization
  • Consultation
  • Decision making
  • Delegation
  • Latent-class model
  • Organizational structure
  • Relational contracting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Authority and communication in firms. / Katayama, Hajime; Meagher, Kieron J.; Wait, Andrew.

In: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{02c91aa36999470ab03d63fb59e880bd,
title = "Authority and communication in firms",
abstract = "We show that decision making in organizations is typically more complicated than simply choosing either to delegate or to centralize. Firms have to consider not only the level at which a decision is made (authority location) but also how many people are involved (authority diffusion), and the type of communication. Utilizing a unique data set, we estimate a latent-class model to identify frequently adopted combinations of decision-making rights and communication across different hierarchical levels relating to the implementation of a significant change. We identify four typical authority/communication structures that can be loosely categorized as: authoritarian centralization; team decision making; consultative centralization; and decentralization. We then explore the relationships between these four authority/communication structures and other characteristics of the firm, such as the size of the organization, worker skills, long-term employer-employee relationships, individual and group incentives and how close the firm is to the productivity frontier. These results are broadly consistent with recent advances in theory, although no one model is rich enough to fully describe all our findings.",
keywords = "Authority, Centralization, Consultation, Decision making, Delegation, Latent-class model, Organizational structure, Relational contracting",
author = "Hajime Katayama and Meagher, {Kieron J.} and Andrew Wait",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jebo.2018.09.005",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization",
issn = "0167-2681",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Authority and communication in firms

AU - Katayama, Hajime

AU - Meagher, Kieron J.

AU - Wait, Andrew

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - We show that decision making in organizations is typically more complicated than simply choosing either to delegate or to centralize. Firms have to consider not only the level at which a decision is made (authority location) but also how many people are involved (authority diffusion), and the type of communication. Utilizing a unique data set, we estimate a latent-class model to identify frequently adopted combinations of decision-making rights and communication across different hierarchical levels relating to the implementation of a significant change. We identify four typical authority/communication structures that can be loosely categorized as: authoritarian centralization; team decision making; consultative centralization; and decentralization. We then explore the relationships between these four authority/communication structures and other characteristics of the firm, such as the size of the organization, worker skills, long-term employer-employee relationships, individual and group incentives and how close the firm is to the productivity frontier. These results are broadly consistent with recent advances in theory, although no one model is rich enough to fully describe all our findings.

AB - We show that decision making in organizations is typically more complicated than simply choosing either to delegate or to centralize. Firms have to consider not only the level at which a decision is made (authority location) but also how many people are involved (authority diffusion), and the type of communication. Utilizing a unique data set, we estimate a latent-class model to identify frequently adopted combinations of decision-making rights and communication across different hierarchical levels relating to the implementation of a significant change. We identify four typical authority/communication structures that can be loosely categorized as: authoritarian centralization; team decision making; consultative centralization; and decentralization. We then explore the relationships between these four authority/communication structures and other characteristics of the firm, such as the size of the organization, worker skills, long-term employer-employee relationships, individual and group incentives and how close the firm is to the productivity frontier. These results are broadly consistent with recent advances in theory, although no one model is rich enough to fully describe all our findings.

KW - Authority

KW - Centralization

KW - Consultation

KW - Decision making

KW - Delegation

KW - Latent-class model

KW - Organizational structure

KW - Relational contracting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054599316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054599316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.09.005

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

JF - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

SN - 0167-2681

ER -