Balance training with a vibrotactile biofeedback system affects the dynamical structure of the center of pressure trajectories in chronic stroke patients

Kentaro Kodama, Kazuhiro Yasuda, Nikita A. Kuznetsov, Yuki Hayashi, Hiroyasu Iwata

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Haptic-based vibrotactile biofeedback (BF) is a promising technique to improve rehabilitation of balance in stroke patients. However, the extent to which BF training changes temporal structure of the center of pressure (CoP) trajectories remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effect of vibrotactile BF training on the temporal structure of CoP during quiet stance in chronic stroke patients using detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). Nine chronic stroke patients (age; 81.56 ± 44 months post-stroke) received a balance training regimen using a vibrotactile BF system twice a week over 4 weeks. A Wii Balance board was used to record five 30 s trials of quiet stance pre- and post-training at 50 Hz. DFA revealed presence of two linear scaling regions in CoP indicating presence of fast- and slow-scale fluctuations. Averaged across all trials, fast-scale fluctuations showed persistent dynamics (α = 1.05 ± 0.08 for ML and α = 0.99 ± 0.17 for AP) and slow-scale fluctuations were anti-persistent (α = 0.35 ± 0.05 for ML and α = 0.32 ± 0.05 for AP). The slow-scale dynamics of ML CoP in stroke patients decreased from pre-training to post-BF training (α = 0.40 ± 0.13 vs. 0.31 ± 0.09). These results suggest that the vibrotactile BF training affects postural control strategy used by chronic stroke patients in the ML direction. Results of the DFA are further discussed in the context of balance training using vibrotactile BF and interpreted from the perspective of intermittent control of upright stance.

Original languageEnglish
Article number84
JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Stroke
Pressure
Rehabilitation

Keywords

  • Balance rehabilitation
  • Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA)
  • Haptic biofeedback
  • Postural control
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Balance training with a vibrotactile biofeedback system affects the dynamical structure of the center of pressure trajectories in chronic stroke patients. / Kodama, Kentaro; Yasuda, Kazuhiro; Kuznetsov, Nikita A.; Hayashi, Yuki; Iwata, Hiroyasu.

In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 13, 84, 01.02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a537030bf0024dcabd348ebd50299f0b,
title = "Balance training with a vibrotactile biofeedback system affects the dynamical structure of the center of pressure trajectories in chronic stroke patients",
abstract = "Haptic-based vibrotactile biofeedback (BF) is a promising technique to improve rehabilitation of balance in stroke patients. However, the extent to which BF training changes temporal structure of the center of pressure (CoP) trajectories remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effect of vibrotactile BF training on the temporal structure of CoP during quiet stance in chronic stroke patients using detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). Nine chronic stroke patients (age; 81.56 ± 44 months post-stroke) received a balance training regimen using a vibrotactile BF system twice a week over 4 weeks. A Wii Balance board was used to record five 30 s trials of quiet stance pre- and post-training at 50 Hz. DFA revealed presence of two linear scaling regions in CoP indicating presence of fast- and slow-scale fluctuations. Averaged across all trials, fast-scale fluctuations showed persistent dynamics (α = 1.05 ± 0.08 for ML and α = 0.99 ± 0.17 for AP) and slow-scale fluctuations were anti-persistent (α = 0.35 ± 0.05 for ML and α = 0.32 ± 0.05 for AP). The slow-scale dynamics of ML CoP in stroke patients decreased from pre-training to post-BF training (α = 0.40 ± 0.13 vs. 0.31 ± 0.09). These results suggest that the vibrotactile BF training affects postural control strategy used by chronic stroke patients in the ML direction. Results of the DFA are further discussed in the context of balance training using vibrotactile BF and interpreted from the perspective of intermittent control of upright stance.",
keywords = "Balance rehabilitation, Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA), Haptic biofeedback, Postural control, Stroke",
author = "Kentaro Kodama and Kazuhiro Yasuda and Kuznetsov, {Nikita A.} and Yuki Hayashi and Hiroyasu Iwata",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3389/fnhum.2019.00084",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5161",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Balance training with a vibrotactile biofeedback system affects the dynamical structure of the center of pressure trajectories in chronic stroke patients

AU - Kodama, Kentaro

AU - Yasuda, Kazuhiro

AU - Kuznetsov, Nikita A.

AU - Hayashi, Yuki

AU - Iwata, Hiroyasu

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Haptic-based vibrotactile biofeedback (BF) is a promising technique to improve rehabilitation of balance in stroke patients. However, the extent to which BF training changes temporal structure of the center of pressure (CoP) trajectories remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effect of vibrotactile BF training on the temporal structure of CoP during quiet stance in chronic stroke patients using detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). Nine chronic stroke patients (age; 81.56 ± 44 months post-stroke) received a balance training regimen using a vibrotactile BF system twice a week over 4 weeks. A Wii Balance board was used to record five 30 s trials of quiet stance pre- and post-training at 50 Hz. DFA revealed presence of two linear scaling regions in CoP indicating presence of fast- and slow-scale fluctuations. Averaged across all trials, fast-scale fluctuations showed persistent dynamics (α = 1.05 ± 0.08 for ML and α = 0.99 ± 0.17 for AP) and slow-scale fluctuations were anti-persistent (α = 0.35 ± 0.05 for ML and α = 0.32 ± 0.05 for AP). The slow-scale dynamics of ML CoP in stroke patients decreased from pre-training to post-BF training (α = 0.40 ± 0.13 vs. 0.31 ± 0.09). These results suggest that the vibrotactile BF training affects postural control strategy used by chronic stroke patients in the ML direction. Results of the DFA are further discussed in the context of balance training using vibrotactile BF and interpreted from the perspective of intermittent control of upright stance.

AB - Haptic-based vibrotactile biofeedback (BF) is a promising technique to improve rehabilitation of balance in stroke patients. However, the extent to which BF training changes temporal structure of the center of pressure (CoP) trajectories remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effect of vibrotactile BF training on the temporal structure of CoP during quiet stance in chronic stroke patients using detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). Nine chronic stroke patients (age; 81.56 ± 44 months post-stroke) received a balance training regimen using a vibrotactile BF system twice a week over 4 weeks. A Wii Balance board was used to record five 30 s trials of quiet stance pre- and post-training at 50 Hz. DFA revealed presence of two linear scaling regions in CoP indicating presence of fast- and slow-scale fluctuations. Averaged across all trials, fast-scale fluctuations showed persistent dynamics (α = 1.05 ± 0.08 for ML and α = 0.99 ± 0.17 for AP) and slow-scale fluctuations were anti-persistent (α = 0.35 ± 0.05 for ML and α = 0.32 ± 0.05 for AP). The slow-scale dynamics of ML CoP in stroke patients decreased from pre-training to post-BF training (α = 0.40 ± 0.13 vs. 0.31 ± 0.09). These results suggest that the vibrotactile BF training affects postural control strategy used by chronic stroke patients in the ML direction. Results of the DFA are further discussed in the context of balance training using vibrotactile BF and interpreted from the perspective of intermittent control of upright stance.

KW - Balance rehabilitation

KW - Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA)

KW - Haptic biofeedback

KW - Postural control

KW - Stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069468049&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069468049&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00084

DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00084

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069468049

VL - 13

JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5161

M1 - 84

ER -