Beyond the end of history: The need for a 'radical historicisation' of democracy in international relations

Christopher Edward Hobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To properly comprehend democracy's present and future role in politics, particularly in regards to processes of democratisation and democracy promotion, we must cultivate a more nuanced reading of democracy's past. Needed is 'a radical historicisation of democracy', in Frank Ankersmit's words, which foregrounds that democracy is a contingent historical fact, necessarily conditioned by its past. This position is contrasted to the standard account of democracy and its history provided by liberalism. Rather than comfortably accepting the current prominence of liberal democracy and the widespread normative agreement on this form of rule, this article instead considers the much longer tradition of thought which regarded democracy as something negative and very distinct from liberalism. In so doing, a sensitive reading of democracy's past promotes a much more reflexive position, which opens space for considering whether the present state of affairs is actually much less secure and more fragile than many liberal proponents of democracy tend to suggest. At the same time, this approach also points the way towards a more considered case for democracy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)631-657
Number of pages27
JournalMillennium: Journal of International Studies
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

international relations
democracy
history
liberalism
present
democratization
promotion
politics

Keywords

  • Democracy
  • Democracy promotion
  • Democratisation
  • End of history
  • Liberalism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Beyond the end of history : The need for a 'radical historicisation' of democracy in international relations. / Hobson, Christopher Edward.

In: Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2009, p. 631-657.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{07f0448a9a14438ca38e82240b730efa,
title = "Beyond the end of history: The need for a 'radical historicisation' of democracy in international relations",
abstract = "To properly comprehend democracy's present and future role in politics, particularly in regards to processes of democratisation and democracy promotion, we must cultivate a more nuanced reading of democracy's past. Needed is 'a radical historicisation of democracy', in Frank Ankersmit's words, which foregrounds that democracy is a contingent historical fact, necessarily conditioned by its past. This position is contrasted to the standard account of democracy and its history provided by liberalism. Rather than comfortably accepting the current prominence of liberal democracy and the widespread normative agreement on this form of rule, this article instead considers the much longer tradition of thought which regarded democracy as something negative and very distinct from liberalism. In so doing, a sensitive reading of democracy's past promotes a much more reflexive position, which opens space for considering whether the present state of affairs is actually much less secure and more fragile than many liberal proponents of democracy tend to suggest. At the same time, this approach also points the way towards a more considered case for democracy.",
keywords = "Democracy, Democracy promotion, Democratisation, End of history, Liberalism",
author = "Hobson, {Christopher Edward}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1177/0305829809103237",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "631--657",
journal = "Millennium: Journal of International Studies",
issn = "0305-8298",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond the end of history

T2 - The need for a 'radical historicisation' of democracy in international relations

AU - Hobson, Christopher Edward

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - To properly comprehend democracy's present and future role in politics, particularly in regards to processes of democratisation and democracy promotion, we must cultivate a more nuanced reading of democracy's past. Needed is 'a radical historicisation of democracy', in Frank Ankersmit's words, which foregrounds that democracy is a contingent historical fact, necessarily conditioned by its past. This position is contrasted to the standard account of democracy and its history provided by liberalism. Rather than comfortably accepting the current prominence of liberal democracy and the widespread normative agreement on this form of rule, this article instead considers the much longer tradition of thought which regarded democracy as something negative and very distinct from liberalism. In so doing, a sensitive reading of democracy's past promotes a much more reflexive position, which opens space for considering whether the present state of affairs is actually much less secure and more fragile than many liberal proponents of democracy tend to suggest. At the same time, this approach also points the way towards a more considered case for democracy.

AB - To properly comprehend democracy's present and future role in politics, particularly in regards to processes of democratisation and democracy promotion, we must cultivate a more nuanced reading of democracy's past. Needed is 'a radical historicisation of democracy', in Frank Ankersmit's words, which foregrounds that democracy is a contingent historical fact, necessarily conditioned by its past. This position is contrasted to the standard account of democracy and its history provided by liberalism. Rather than comfortably accepting the current prominence of liberal democracy and the widespread normative agreement on this form of rule, this article instead considers the much longer tradition of thought which regarded democracy as something negative and very distinct from liberalism. In so doing, a sensitive reading of democracy's past promotes a much more reflexive position, which opens space for considering whether the present state of affairs is actually much less secure and more fragile than many liberal proponents of democracy tend to suggest. At the same time, this approach also points the way towards a more considered case for democracy.

KW - Democracy

KW - Democracy promotion

KW - Democratisation

KW - End of history

KW - Liberalism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66849140735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66849140735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0305829809103237

DO - 10.1177/0305829809103237

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:66849140735

VL - 37

SP - 631

EP - 657

JO - Millennium: Journal of International Studies

JF - Millennium: Journal of International Studies

SN - 0305-8298

IS - 3

ER -