Blaming leaders for organizational accidents: Proxy logic in collective- versus individual-agency cultures

Yuriko Zemba, Maia J. Young, Michael W. Morris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current research investigates whether observers blame leaders for organizational accidents even when these managers are known to be causally uninvolved. Past research finds that the public blames managers for organizational harm if the managers are perceived to have personally played a causal role. The present research argues that East Asian perceivers, who are culturally oriented to focus on the causal influence of groups [Menon, T., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1999). Culture and the construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 701-717.], blame managers based on the behavior of the group, not only based on the behavior of the individual managers. We argue that perceivers first assign responsibility to the collectivity, the organizational unit or some group within it, and then extend responsibility to the manager representing it. We tested this proposal in a series of studies with a community sample in Japan and matched student samples of Japanese and Americans. Results show that perceivers who are culturally oriented to focus on collective-level causality (Japanese, more so than Americans; Asian Americans, more so than European Americans) blame leaders through proxy logic. Implications of this intuitive logic and of the cultural difference are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-51
Number of pages16
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume101
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Sep
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Proxy
Accidents
Asian Americans
Research
Social Psychology
Causality
Personality
Japan
Students
Managers
Logic

Keywords

  • Accident
  • Attribution
  • Blame
  • Culture
  • Group
  • Managers
  • Organization
  • Proxy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Blaming leaders for organizational accidents : Proxy logic in collective- versus individual-agency cultures. / Zemba, Yuriko; Young, Maia J.; Morris, Michael W.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 101, No. 1, 09.2006, p. 36-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{724dc223c6b94ae69367f668246106d7,
title = "Blaming leaders for organizational accidents: Proxy logic in collective- versus individual-agency cultures",
abstract = "The current research investigates whether observers blame leaders for organizational accidents even when these managers are known to be causally uninvolved. Past research finds that the public blames managers for organizational harm if the managers are perceived to have personally played a causal role. The present research argues that East Asian perceivers, who are culturally oriented to focus on the causal influence of groups [Menon, T., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1999). Culture and the construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 701-717.], blame managers based on the behavior of the group, not only based on the behavior of the individual managers. We argue that perceivers first assign responsibility to the collectivity, the organizational unit or some group within it, and then extend responsibility to the manager representing it. We tested this proposal in a series of studies with a community sample in Japan and matched student samples of Japanese and Americans. Results show that perceivers who are culturally oriented to focus on collective-level causality (Japanese, more so than Americans; Asian Americans, more so than European Americans) blame leaders through proxy logic. Implications of this intuitive logic and of the cultural difference are discussed.",
keywords = "Accident, Attribution, Blame, Culture, Group, Managers, Organization, Proxy",
author = "Yuriko Zemba and Young, {Maia J.} and Morris, {Michael W.}",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.007",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "36--51",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blaming leaders for organizational accidents

T2 - Proxy logic in collective- versus individual-agency cultures

AU - Zemba, Yuriko

AU - Young, Maia J.

AU - Morris, Michael W.

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - The current research investigates whether observers blame leaders for organizational accidents even when these managers are known to be causally uninvolved. Past research finds that the public blames managers for organizational harm if the managers are perceived to have personally played a causal role. The present research argues that East Asian perceivers, who are culturally oriented to focus on the causal influence of groups [Menon, T., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1999). Culture and the construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 701-717.], blame managers based on the behavior of the group, not only based on the behavior of the individual managers. We argue that perceivers first assign responsibility to the collectivity, the organizational unit or some group within it, and then extend responsibility to the manager representing it. We tested this proposal in a series of studies with a community sample in Japan and matched student samples of Japanese and Americans. Results show that perceivers who are culturally oriented to focus on collective-level causality (Japanese, more so than Americans; Asian Americans, more so than European Americans) blame leaders through proxy logic. Implications of this intuitive logic and of the cultural difference are discussed.

AB - The current research investigates whether observers blame leaders for organizational accidents even when these managers are known to be causally uninvolved. Past research finds that the public blames managers for organizational harm if the managers are perceived to have personally played a causal role. The present research argues that East Asian perceivers, who are culturally oriented to focus on the causal influence of groups [Menon, T., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1999). Culture and the construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 701-717.], blame managers based on the behavior of the group, not only based on the behavior of the individual managers. We argue that perceivers first assign responsibility to the collectivity, the organizational unit or some group within it, and then extend responsibility to the manager representing it. We tested this proposal in a series of studies with a community sample in Japan and matched student samples of Japanese and Americans. Results show that perceivers who are culturally oriented to focus on collective-level causality (Japanese, more so than Americans; Asian Americans, more so than European Americans) blame leaders through proxy logic. Implications of this intuitive logic and of the cultural difference are discussed.

KW - Accident

KW - Attribution

KW - Blame

KW - Culture

KW - Group

KW - Managers

KW - Organization

KW - Proxy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748917789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748917789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.007

DO - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33748917789

VL - 101

SP - 36

EP - 51

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 1

ER -