Blood pressure biofeedback treatment of white-coat hypertension

Mutsuhiro Nakao, Shinobu Nomura, Tatsuo Shimosawa, Toshiro Fujita, Tomifusa Kuboki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to compare blood pressure (BP) biofeedback treatment (BF) effects between white-coat hypertension and essential hypertension. Methods: Fifteen white-coat hypertensive out-patients and 23 essential hypertensive out-patients were randomly assigned to groups A or B. Subjects in group A underwent BF once a week for a total of four sessions. Those in group B visited the clinic only to measure BP and later underwent the same BF. Results: In group A, BPs of white-coat hypertensives and essential hypertensives were significantly reduced by 22/11 and 14/8 mmHg, respectively. In group B, they were unchanged during the same period but later suppressed by BF. Under BF, pulse and respiratory rates were significantly higher, and elevation of diastolic BP due to mental stress testing was better suppressed in white-coat hypertensives than in essential hypertensives. Conclusion: This treatment was effective in both types of hypertension, and pressor response to stress seems to be important in the differentiated BF effect. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-169
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000 Feb
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

White Coat Hypertension
Blood Pressure
Therapeutics
Outpatients
Respiratory Rate
Heart Rate
Hypertension

Keywords

  • Biofeedback
  • Blood pressure
  • Essential hypertension
  • Mental stress testing
  • Self-monitoring
  • White-coat hypertension

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Blood pressure biofeedback treatment of white-coat hypertension. / Nakao, Mutsuhiro; Nomura, Shinobu; Shimosawa, Tatsuo; Fujita, Toshiro; Kuboki, Tomifusa.

In: Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Vol. 48, No. 2, 02.2000, p. 161-169.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nakao, M, Nomura, S, Shimosawa, T, Fujita, T & Kuboki, T 2000, 'Blood pressure biofeedback treatment of white-coat hypertension', Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(99)00104-X
Nakao, Mutsuhiro ; Nomura, Shinobu ; Shimosawa, Tatsuo ; Fujita, Toshiro ; Kuboki, Tomifusa. / Blood pressure biofeedback treatment of white-coat hypertension. In: Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2000 ; Vol. 48, No. 2. pp. 161-169.
@article{2eae5d45bcb14ddb9a2d24ed169b0d43,
title = "Blood pressure biofeedback treatment of white-coat hypertension",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of the study was to compare blood pressure (BP) biofeedback treatment (BF) effects between white-coat hypertension and essential hypertension. Methods: Fifteen white-coat hypertensive out-patients and 23 essential hypertensive out-patients were randomly assigned to groups A or B. Subjects in group A underwent BF once a week for a total of four sessions. Those in group B visited the clinic only to measure BP and later underwent the same BF. Results: In group A, BPs of white-coat hypertensives and essential hypertensives were significantly reduced by 22/11 and 14/8 mmHg, respectively. In group B, they were unchanged during the same period but later suppressed by BF. Under BF, pulse and respiratory rates were significantly higher, and elevation of diastolic BP due to mental stress testing was better suppressed in white-coat hypertensives than in essential hypertensives. Conclusion: This treatment was effective in both types of hypertension, and pressor response to stress seems to be important in the differentiated BF effect. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Biofeedback, Blood pressure, Essential hypertension, Mental stress testing, Self-monitoring, White-coat hypertension",
author = "Mutsuhiro Nakao and Shinobu Nomura and Tatsuo Shimosawa and Toshiro Fujita and Tomifusa Kuboki",
year = "2000",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-3999(99)00104-X",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "161--169",
journal = "Journal of Psychosomatic Research",
issn = "0022-3999",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blood pressure biofeedback treatment of white-coat hypertension

AU - Nakao, Mutsuhiro

AU - Nomura, Shinobu

AU - Shimosawa, Tatsuo

AU - Fujita, Toshiro

AU - Kuboki, Tomifusa

PY - 2000/2

Y1 - 2000/2

N2 - Objective: The objective of the study was to compare blood pressure (BP) biofeedback treatment (BF) effects between white-coat hypertension and essential hypertension. Methods: Fifteen white-coat hypertensive out-patients and 23 essential hypertensive out-patients were randomly assigned to groups A or B. Subjects in group A underwent BF once a week for a total of four sessions. Those in group B visited the clinic only to measure BP and later underwent the same BF. Results: In group A, BPs of white-coat hypertensives and essential hypertensives were significantly reduced by 22/11 and 14/8 mmHg, respectively. In group B, they were unchanged during the same period but later suppressed by BF. Under BF, pulse and respiratory rates were significantly higher, and elevation of diastolic BP due to mental stress testing was better suppressed in white-coat hypertensives than in essential hypertensives. Conclusion: This treatment was effective in both types of hypertension, and pressor response to stress seems to be important in the differentiated BF effect. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

AB - Objective: The objective of the study was to compare blood pressure (BP) biofeedback treatment (BF) effects between white-coat hypertension and essential hypertension. Methods: Fifteen white-coat hypertensive out-patients and 23 essential hypertensive out-patients were randomly assigned to groups A or B. Subjects in group A underwent BF once a week for a total of four sessions. Those in group B visited the clinic only to measure BP and later underwent the same BF. Results: In group A, BPs of white-coat hypertensives and essential hypertensives were significantly reduced by 22/11 and 14/8 mmHg, respectively. In group B, they were unchanged during the same period but later suppressed by BF. Under BF, pulse and respiratory rates were significantly higher, and elevation of diastolic BP due to mental stress testing was better suppressed in white-coat hypertensives than in essential hypertensives. Conclusion: This treatment was effective in both types of hypertension, and pressor response to stress seems to be important in the differentiated BF effect. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

KW - Biofeedback

KW - Blood pressure

KW - Essential hypertension

KW - Mental stress testing

KW - Self-monitoring

KW - White-coat hypertension

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034043788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034043788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-3999(99)00104-X

DO - 10.1016/S0022-3999(99)00104-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 10719133

AN - SCOPUS:0034043788

VL - 48

SP - 161

EP - 169

JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Research

JF - Journal of Psychosomatic Research

SN - 0022-3999

IS - 2

ER -