Blood pressure biofeedback treatment, organ damage and sympathetic activity in mild hypertension

Mutsuhiro Nakao, Shinobu Nomura, Tatsuo Shimosawa, Toshiro Fujita, Tomifusa Kuboki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although biofeedback treatment is reported to be useful for patients with mild hypertension as an adjunct to medication, it is not certain whether the presence of organ damage affects its efficacy. The aim of this study is to clarify the clinical effects of biofeedback on mild hypertension in the absence and presence of organ damage. Methods: Eleven mildly hypertensive outpatients without damage to the heart, brain, retina or kidney (4 men and 7 women), aged 40-65 years, and 11 mildly hypertensive outpatients with target organ damage and matching variables for age, sex and medication were included in this study. They underwent biofeedback treatment once a week for a total of four sessions. Results: As a result of these sessions, mean blood pressures (MBP) in the organ-damage-negative (-) group and in the organ-damage-positive (+) group were significantly reduced by 12 ± 11 and 12 ± 8, respectively. The decrease was still significant 3 months after the treatment in the organ-damage (-) group, whereas no significant change was found 1 or 3 months after the treatment in the organ-damge (+) group. Throughout these sessions, the ratio of low frequency to high frequency of heart rate variance as well as systolic and MBP gradually decreased in each group (p < 0.01); this ratio of heart rate variance was smaller, and the α-wave amplitude on the electroencephalogram was larger in the organ-damage (-) group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: These results suggested that biofeedback intervention may be effective in mild hypertension, especially when the patient is organ damage (-). Sympathetic activity seems to play an important role in the differentiated response.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-347
Number of pages7
JournalPsychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Volume68
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999 Nov
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Blood Pressure
Hypertension
Outpatients
Heart Rate
Therapeutics
Retina
Electroencephalography
Kidney
Brain

Keywords

  • Biofeedback
  • Blood pressure
  • Mild hypertension
  • Organ damage
  • Sympathetic activity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Blood pressure biofeedback treatment, organ damage and sympathetic activity in mild hypertension. / Nakao, Mutsuhiro; Nomura, Shinobu; Shimosawa, Tatsuo; Fujita, Toshiro; Kuboki, Tomifusa.

In: Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Vol. 68, No. 6, 11.1999, p. 341-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nakao, Mutsuhiro ; Nomura, Shinobu ; Shimosawa, Tatsuo ; Fujita, Toshiro ; Kuboki, Tomifusa. / Blood pressure biofeedback treatment, organ damage and sympathetic activity in mild hypertension. In: Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 1999 ; Vol. 68, No. 6. pp. 341-347.
@article{8e519db37a3c43409e47bca52b2d567b,
title = "Blood pressure biofeedback treatment, organ damage and sympathetic activity in mild hypertension",
abstract = "Background: Although biofeedback treatment is reported to be useful for patients with mild hypertension as an adjunct to medication, it is not certain whether the presence of organ damage affects its efficacy. The aim of this study is to clarify the clinical effects of biofeedback on mild hypertension in the absence and presence of organ damage. Methods: Eleven mildly hypertensive outpatients without damage to the heart, brain, retina or kidney (4 men and 7 women), aged 40-65 years, and 11 mildly hypertensive outpatients with target organ damage and matching variables for age, sex and medication were included in this study. They underwent biofeedback treatment once a week for a total of four sessions. Results: As a result of these sessions, mean blood pressures (MBP) in the organ-damage-negative (-) group and in the organ-damage-positive (+) group were significantly reduced by 12 ± 11 and 12 ± 8, respectively. The decrease was still significant 3 months after the treatment in the organ-damage (-) group, whereas no significant change was found 1 or 3 months after the treatment in the organ-damge (+) group. Throughout these sessions, the ratio of low frequency to high frequency of heart rate variance as well as systolic and MBP gradually decreased in each group (p < 0.01); this ratio of heart rate variance was smaller, and the α-wave amplitude on the electroencephalogram was larger in the organ-damage (-) group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: These results suggested that biofeedback intervention may be effective in mild hypertension, especially when the patient is organ damage (-). Sympathetic activity seems to play an important role in the differentiated response.",
keywords = "Biofeedback, Blood pressure, Mild hypertension, Organ damage, Sympathetic activity",
author = "Mutsuhiro Nakao and Shinobu Nomura and Tatsuo Shimosawa and Toshiro Fujita and Tomifusa Kuboki",
year = "1999",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1159/000012353",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "341--347",
journal = "Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics",
issn = "0033-3190",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blood pressure biofeedback treatment, organ damage and sympathetic activity in mild hypertension

AU - Nakao, Mutsuhiro

AU - Nomura, Shinobu

AU - Shimosawa, Tatsuo

AU - Fujita, Toshiro

AU - Kuboki, Tomifusa

PY - 1999/11

Y1 - 1999/11

N2 - Background: Although biofeedback treatment is reported to be useful for patients with mild hypertension as an adjunct to medication, it is not certain whether the presence of organ damage affects its efficacy. The aim of this study is to clarify the clinical effects of biofeedback on mild hypertension in the absence and presence of organ damage. Methods: Eleven mildly hypertensive outpatients without damage to the heart, brain, retina or kidney (4 men and 7 women), aged 40-65 years, and 11 mildly hypertensive outpatients with target organ damage and matching variables for age, sex and medication were included in this study. They underwent biofeedback treatment once a week for a total of four sessions. Results: As a result of these sessions, mean blood pressures (MBP) in the organ-damage-negative (-) group and in the organ-damage-positive (+) group were significantly reduced by 12 ± 11 and 12 ± 8, respectively. The decrease was still significant 3 months after the treatment in the organ-damage (-) group, whereas no significant change was found 1 or 3 months after the treatment in the organ-damge (+) group. Throughout these sessions, the ratio of low frequency to high frequency of heart rate variance as well as systolic and MBP gradually decreased in each group (p < 0.01); this ratio of heart rate variance was smaller, and the α-wave amplitude on the electroencephalogram was larger in the organ-damage (-) group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: These results suggested that biofeedback intervention may be effective in mild hypertension, especially when the patient is organ damage (-). Sympathetic activity seems to play an important role in the differentiated response.

AB - Background: Although biofeedback treatment is reported to be useful for patients with mild hypertension as an adjunct to medication, it is not certain whether the presence of organ damage affects its efficacy. The aim of this study is to clarify the clinical effects of biofeedback on mild hypertension in the absence and presence of organ damage. Methods: Eleven mildly hypertensive outpatients without damage to the heart, brain, retina or kidney (4 men and 7 women), aged 40-65 years, and 11 mildly hypertensive outpatients with target organ damage and matching variables for age, sex and medication were included in this study. They underwent biofeedback treatment once a week for a total of four sessions. Results: As a result of these sessions, mean blood pressures (MBP) in the organ-damage-negative (-) group and in the organ-damage-positive (+) group were significantly reduced by 12 ± 11 and 12 ± 8, respectively. The decrease was still significant 3 months after the treatment in the organ-damage (-) group, whereas no significant change was found 1 or 3 months after the treatment in the organ-damge (+) group. Throughout these sessions, the ratio of low frequency to high frequency of heart rate variance as well as systolic and MBP gradually decreased in each group (p < 0.01); this ratio of heart rate variance was smaller, and the α-wave amplitude on the electroencephalogram was larger in the organ-damage (-) group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: These results suggested that biofeedback intervention may be effective in mild hypertension, especially when the patient is organ damage (-). Sympathetic activity seems to play an important role in the differentiated response.

KW - Biofeedback

KW - Blood pressure

KW - Mild hypertension

KW - Organ damage

KW - Sympathetic activity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032727148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032727148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000012353

DO - 10.1159/000012353

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 341

EP - 347

JO - Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

JF - Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

SN - 0033-3190

IS - 6

ER -