Centrifugal regulation of task-relevant somatosensory signals to trigger a voluntary movement

Tetsuo Kida, Toshiaki Wasaka, Hiroki Nakata, Ryusuke Kakigi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many previous papers have reported the modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) during voluntary movement, but the locus and mechanism underlying the movement-induced centrifugal modulation of the SEPs elicited by a task-relevant somatosensory stimulus still remain unclear. We investigated the centrifugal modulation of the SEPs elicited by a task-relevant somatosensory stimulus which triggers a voluntary movement in a forewarned reaction time task. A pair of warning (S1: auditory) and imperative stimuli (S2: somatosensory) was presented with a 1 s interstimulus interval. Subjects were instructed to respond by moving the hand ipsilateral or contralateral to the somatosensory stimulation which elicits the SEPs. In four experiments, the locus and selectivity of the SEPs' modulation, the contribution of cutaneous afferents and the effect of contraction magnitude were examined, respectively. A control condition where subjects had no task to perform was compared to several task conditions. The amplitude of the frontal N30, parietal P30, and central P25 was decreased and that of the long latency P80 and N140 was increased when the somatosensory stimuli triggered a voluntary movement of the stimulated finger compared to the control condition. The N60 decreased with the movement of any finger. These results were considered to be caused by the centrifugal influence of neuronal activity which occurs before a somatosensory imperative stimulus. The present findings did not support the hypothesis that the inhibition of afferent inputs by descending motor commands can occur at subcortical levels. A higher contraction magnitude produced a further attenuation of the amplitude of the frontal N30, while it decreased the enhancement of the P80. Moreover, the modulation of neuronal responses seems to result mainly from the modulation of cutaneous afferents, especially from the moved body parts. In conclusion, the short- and long-latency somatosensory neuronal activities evoked by task-relevant ascending afferents from the moved body parts are regulated differently by motor-related neuronal activities before those afferent inputs. The latter activities may be associated with sensory gain regulation related to directing attention to body parts involved in the action.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-301
Number of pages13
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume169
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Mar

Fingerprint

Somatosensory Evoked Potentials
Human Body
Fingers
Skin
Reaction Time
Hand

Keywords

  • EEG
  • Gating
  • Movement
  • Somatosensory evoked potentials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Centrifugal regulation of task-relevant somatosensory signals to trigger a voluntary movement. / Kida, Tetsuo; Wasaka, Toshiaki; Nakata, Hiroki; Kakigi, Ryusuke.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 169, No. 3, 03.2006, p. 289-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kida, Tetsuo ; Wasaka, Toshiaki ; Nakata, Hiroki ; Kakigi, Ryusuke. / Centrifugal regulation of task-relevant somatosensory signals to trigger a voluntary movement. In: Experimental Brain Research. 2006 ; Vol. 169, No. 3. pp. 289-301.
@article{5e0c46aa3dd54514a87500d4ad568681,
title = "Centrifugal regulation of task-relevant somatosensory signals to trigger a voluntary movement",
abstract = "Many previous papers have reported the modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) during voluntary movement, but the locus and mechanism underlying the movement-induced centrifugal modulation of the SEPs elicited by a task-relevant somatosensory stimulus still remain unclear. We investigated the centrifugal modulation of the SEPs elicited by a task-relevant somatosensory stimulus which triggers a voluntary movement in a forewarned reaction time task. A pair of warning (S1: auditory) and imperative stimuli (S2: somatosensory) was presented with a 1 s interstimulus interval. Subjects were instructed to respond by moving the hand ipsilateral or contralateral to the somatosensory stimulation which elicits the SEPs. In four experiments, the locus and selectivity of the SEPs' modulation, the contribution of cutaneous afferents and the effect of contraction magnitude were examined, respectively. A control condition where subjects had no task to perform was compared to several task conditions. The amplitude of the frontal N30, parietal P30, and central P25 was decreased and that of the long latency P80 and N140 was increased when the somatosensory stimuli triggered a voluntary movement of the stimulated finger compared to the control condition. The N60 decreased with the movement of any finger. These results were considered to be caused by the centrifugal influence of neuronal activity which occurs before a somatosensory imperative stimulus. The present findings did not support the hypothesis that the inhibition of afferent inputs by descending motor commands can occur at subcortical levels. A higher contraction magnitude produced a further attenuation of the amplitude of the frontal N30, while it decreased the enhancement of the P80. Moreover, the modulation of neuronal responses seems to result mainly from the modulation of cutaneous afferents, especially from the moved body parts. In conclusion, the short- and long-latency somatosensory neuronal activities evoked by task-relevant ascending afferents from the moved body parts are regulated differently by motor-related neuronal activities before those afferent inputs. The latter activities may be associated with sensory gain regulation related to directing attention to body parts involved in the action.",
keywords = "EEG, Gating, Movement, Somatosensory evoked potentials",
author = "Tetsuo Kida and Toshiaki Wasaka and Hiroki Nakata and Ryusuke Kakigi",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-005-0141-8",
language = "English",
volume = "169",
pages = "289--301",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Centrifugal regulation of task-relevant somatosensory signals to trigger a voluntary movement

AU - Kida, Tetsuo

AU - Wasaka, Toshiaki

AU - Nakata, Hiroki

AU - Kakigi, Ryusuke

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Many previous papers have reported the modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) during voluntary movement, but the locus and mechanism underlying the movement-induced centrifugal modulation of the SEPs elicited by a task-relevant somatosensory stimulus still remain unclear. We investigated the centrifugal modulation of the SEPs elicited by a task-relevant somatosensory stimulus which triggers a voluntary movement in a forewarned reaction time task. A pair of warning (S1: auditory) and imperative stimuli (S2: somatosensory) was presented with a 1 s interstimulus interval. Subjects were instructed to respond by moving the hand ipsilateral or contralateral to the somatosensory stimulation which elicits the SEPs. In four experiments, the locus and selectivity of the SEPs' modulation, the contribution of cutaneous afferents and the effect of contraction magnitude were examined, respectively. A control condition where subjects had no task to perform was compared to several task conditions. The amplitude of the frontal N30, parietal P30, and central P25 was decreased and that of the long latency P80 and N140 was increased when the somatosensory stimuli triggered a voluntary movement of the stimulated finger compared to the control condition. The N60 decreased with the movement of any finger. These results were considered to be caused by the centrifugal influence of neuronal activity which occurs before a somatosensory imperative stimulus. The present findings did not support the hypothesis that the inhibition of afferent inputs by descending motor commands can occur at subcortical levels. A higher contraction magnitude produced a further attenuation of the amplitude of the frontal N30, while it decreased the enhancement of the P80. Moreover, the modulation of neuronal responses seems to result mainly from the modulation of cutaneous afferents, especially from the moved body parts. In conclusion, the short- and long-latency somatosensory neuronal activities evoked by task-relevant ascending afferents from the moved body parts are regulated differently by motor-related neuronal activities before those afferent inputs. The latter activities may be associated with sensory gain regulation related to directing attention to body parts involved in the action.

AB - Many previous papers have reported the modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) during voluntary movement, but the locus and mechanism underlying the movement-induced centrifugal modulation of the SEPs elicited by a task-relevant somatosensory stimulus still remain unclear. We investigated the centrifugal modulation of the SEPs elicited by a task-relevant somatosensory stimulus which triggers a voluntary movement in a forewarned reaction time task. A pair of warning (S1: auditory) and imperative stimuli (S2: somatosensory) was presented with a 1 s interstimulus interval. Subjects were instructed to respond by moving the hand ipsilateral or contralateral to the somatosensory stimulation which elicits the SEPs. In four experiments, the locus and selectivity of the SEPs' modulation, the contribution of cutaneous afferents and the effect of contraction magnitude were examined, respectively. A control condition where subjects had no task to perform was compared to several task conditions. The amplitude of the frontal N30, parietal P30, and central P25 was decreased and that of the long latency P80 and N140 was increased when the somatosensory stimuli triggered a voluntary movement of the stimulated finger compared to the control condition. The N60 decreased with the movement of any finger. These results were considered to be caused by the centrifugal influence of neuronal activity which occurs before a somatosensory imperative stimulus. The present findings did not support the hypothesis that the inhibition of afferent inputs by descending motor commands can occur at subcortical levels. A higher contraction magnitude produced a further attenuation of the amplitude of the frontal N30, while it decreased the enhancement of the P80. Moreover, the modulation of neuronal responses seems to result mainly from the modulation of cutaneous afferents, especially from the moved body parts. In conclusion, the short- and long-latency somatosensory neuronal activities evoked by task-relevant ascending afferents from the moved body parts are regulated differently by motor-related neuronal activities before those afferent inputs. The latter activities may be associated with sensory gain regulation related to directing attention to body parts involved in the action.

KW - EEG

KW - Gating

KW - Movement

KW - Somatosensory evoked potentials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644824026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644824026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-005-0141-8

DO - 10.1007/s00221-005-0141-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 16307265

AN - SCOPUS:33644824026

VL - 169

SP - 289

EP - 301

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 3

ER -