Changes in the somatosensory N250 and P300 by the variation of reaction time

Tetsuo Kida, Yoshiaki Nishihira, Arihiro Hatta, Toshiaki Wasaka, Hiroki Nakata, Masanori Sakamoto, Tsuyoshi Nakajima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between somatosensory event-related potentials (ERP) and the variation of reaction time (RT). For this purpose, we recorded the ERPs (N250 and P300) in fast- and slow-reaction trials during a somatosensory discrimination task. Strong, standard, and weak target electrical stimuli were randomly delivered to the left median nerve at the wrist with a random interstimulus interval (900-1,100 ms). All the subjects were instructed to respond by pressing a button with their right thumb as fast as possible whenever a target stimulus was presented. We divided all the trials into fast- and slow-RT trials and averaged the data. N250 latency tended to be delayed when the RT was slow, but not significantly. P300 latency was delayed significantly when the RT was slow, but to a much lesser extent than the RT delay, so we concluded that the change of RT was not fully determined by the processes reflected by the somatosensory N250 or P300. Furthermore, the larger and earlier P300 in the fast-RT trials implied that when larger amounts of attentional resources were allocated to a given task, the speed of stimulus evaluation somewhat increased and RT was shortened to a great extent. N250 amplitude did not significantly vary in the two RT clusters. In conclusion, the somatosensory N250 reflects active target detection, which is relatively independent of the modulation of the response speed, whereas the somatosensory P300 could change without manipulation of either the stimulus or the response processing demand.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)326-330
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology
Volume89
Issue number3-4
Publication statusPublished - 2003 May

Fingerprint

Reaction Time
Median Nerve
Thumb
Wrist
Evoked Potentials

Keywords

  • Attention
  • N250
  • P300
  • Reaction time
  • Somatosensory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Physiology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Kida, T., Nishihira, Y., Hatta, A., Wasaka, T., Nakata, H., Sakamoto, M., & Nakajima, T. (2003). Changes in the somatosensory N250 and P300 by the variation of reaction time. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 89(3-4), 326-330.

Changes in the somatosensory N250 and P300 by the variation of reaction time. / Kida, Tetsuo; Nishihira, Yoshiaki; Hatta, Arihiro; Wasaka, Toshiaki; Nakata, Hiroki; Sakamoto, Masanori; Nakajima, Tsuyoshi.

In: European Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 89, No. 3-4, 05.2003, p. 326-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kida, T, Nishihira, Y, Hatta, A, Wasaka, T, Nakata, H, Sakamoto, M & Nakajima, T 2003, 'Changes in the somatosensory N250 and P300 by the variation of reaction time', European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 89, no. 3-4, pp. 326-330.
Kida T, Nishihira Y, Hatta A, Wasaka T, Nakata H, Sakamoto M et al. Changes in the somatosensory N250 and P300 by the variation of reaction time. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2003 May;89(3-4):326-330.
Kida, Tetsuo ; Nishihira, Yoshiaki ; Hatta, Arihiro ; Wasaka, Toshiaki ; Nakata, Hiroki ; Sakamoto, Masanori ; Nakajima, Tsuyoshi. / Changes in the somatosensory N250 and P300 by the variation of reaction time. In: European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2003 ; Vol. 89, No. 3-4. pp. 326-330.
@article{9e9e5c5f72834786aeb2b3a9b23420d6,
title = "Changes in the somatosensory N250 and P300 by the variation of reaction time",
abstract = "We investigated the relationship between somatosensory event-related potentials (ERP) and the variation of reaction time (RT). For this purpose, we recorded the ERPs (N250 and P300) in fast- and slow-reaction trials during a somatosensory discrimination task. Strong, standard, and weak target electrical stimuli were randomly delivered to the left median nerve at the wrist with a random interstimulus interval (900-1,100 ms). All the subjects were instructed to respond by pressing a button with their right thumb as fast as possible whenever a target stimulus was presented. We divided all the trials into fast- and slow-RT trials and averaged the data. N250 latency tended to be delayed when the RT was slow, but not significantly. P300 latency was delayed significantly when the RT was slow, but to a much lesser extent than the RT delay, so we concluded that the change of RT was not fully determined by the processes reflected by the somatosensory N250 or P300. Furthermore, the larger and earlier P300 in the fast-RT trials implied that when larger amounts of attentional resources were allocated to a given task, the speed of stimulus evaluation somewhat increased and RT was shortened to a great extent. N250 amplitude did not significantly vary in the two RT clusters. In conclusion, the somatosensory N250 reflects active target detection, which is relatively independent of the modulation of the response speed, whereas the somatosensory P300 could change without manipulation of either the stimulus or the response processing demand.",
keywords = "Attention, N250, P300, Reaction time, Somatosensory",
author = "Tetsuo Kida and Yoshiaki Nishihira and Arihiro Hatta and Toshiaki Wasaka and Hiroki Nakata and Masanori Sakamoto and Tsuyoshi Nakajima",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "326--330",
journal = "European Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "1439-6319",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changes in the somatosensory N250 and P300 by the variation of reaction time

AU - Kida, Tetsuo

AU - Nishihira, Yoshiaki

AU - Hatta, Arihiro

AU - Wasaka, Toshiaki

AU - Nakata, Hiroki

AU - Sakamoto, Masanori

AU - Nakajima, Tsuyoshi

PY - 2003/5

Y1 - 2003/5

N2 - We investigated the relationship between somatosensory event-related potentials (ERP) and the variation of reaction time (RT). For this purpose, we recorded the ERPs (N250 and P300) in fast- and slow-reaction trials during a somatosensory discrimination task. Strong, standard, and weak target electrical stimuli were randomly delivered to the left median nerve at the wrist with a random interstimulus interval (900-1,100 ms). All the subjects were instructed to respond by pressing a button with their right thumb as fast as possible whenever a target stimulus was presented. We divided all the trials into fast- and slow-RT trials and averaged the data. N250 latency tended to be delayed when the RT was slow, but not significantly. P300 latency was delayed significantly when the RT was slow, but to a much lesser extent than the RT delay, so we concluded that the change of RT was not fully determined by the processes reflected by the somatosensory N250 or P300. Furthermore, the larger and earlier P300 in the fast-RT trials implied that when larger amounts of attentional resources were allocated to a given task, the speed of stimulus evaluation somewhat increased and RT was shortened to a great extent. N250 amplitude did not significantly vary in the two RT clusters. In conclusion, the somatosensory N250 reflects active target detection, which is relatively independent of the modulation of the response speed, whereas the somatosensory P300 could change without manipulation of either the stimulus or the response processing demand.

AB - We investigated the relationship between somatosensory event-related potentials (ERP) and the variation of reaction time (RT). For this purpose, we recorded the ERPs (N250 and P300) in fast- and slow-reaction trials during a somatosensory discrimination task. Strong, standard, and weak target electrical stimuli were randomly delivered to the left median nerve at the wrist with a random interstimulus interval (900-1,100 ms). All the subjects were instructed to respond by pressing a button with their right thumb as fast as possible whenever a target stimulus was presented. We divided all the trials into fast- and slow-RT trials and averaged the data. N250 latency tended to be delayed when the RT was slow, but not significantly. P300 latency was delayed significantly when the RT was slow, but to a much lesser extent than the RT delay, so we concluded that the change of RT was not fully determined by the processes reflected by the somatosensory N250 or P300. Furthermore, the larger and earlier P300 in the fast-RT trials implied that when larger amounts of attentional resources were allocated to a given task, the speed of stimulus evaluation somewhat increased and RT was shortened to a great extent. N250 amplitude did not significantly vary in the two RT clusters. In conclusion, the somatosensory N250 reflects active target detection, which is relatively independent of the modulation of the response speed, whereas the somatosensory P300 could change without manipulation of either the stimulus or the response processing demand.

KW - Attention

KW - N250

KW - P300

KW - Reaction time

KW - Somatosensory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038650525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038650525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12736841

AN - SCOPUS:0038650525

VL - 89

SP - 326

EP - 330

JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 1439-6319

IS - 3-4

ER -