Comparative analysis: Cognitive process of residential interior space: Interior planning method from Professional and Non-Professional point of view - Part I

Hiromi Itami, Bo Peng, Takaya Kojima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper presents a research result on cognitive difference of interior living space between professionals specialized in architecture ("Professionals") and general public ("Non-professional"). 1) Almost perfect match in cognitive structure of aesthetic values up to the first four cognitive dimensions. The difference was observed at the fifth dimension. 2) Different interpretation of aesthetic values: Non-Professionals tend to recognize adjectives that appeal to emotion better, while Professionals recognize the description of interior components and details. 3) The interior planning may be implemented smoothly if different languages are used by Professionals in the fifth dimensions that appeal to Non-Professionals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-134
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Environmental Engineering (Japan)
Volume84
Issue number756
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Feb

Keywords

  • Canonical correlation analysis
  • Cognitive structure
  • Correspondence analysis
  • Individual scale method
  • Interior space
  • Multiple sorting procedure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative analysis: Cognitive process of residential interior space: Interior planning method from Professional and Non-Professional point of view - Part I'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this