Comparative analysis of tsunami recovery strategies in small communities in Japan and Chile

Ven Paolo Bruno Valenzuela, Ratnayakage Sameera Maduranga Samarasekara, A. H.T.Shyam Kularathna, G. Carlota Cubelos Perez, Furukawa Norikazu, Richard Nathan Crichton, Marco Quiroz, Ramon Yavar, Ikeda Izumi, Rafael Aranguiz, Onuki Motoharu, Miguel Esteban

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction emphasizes the need to rebuild better after a disaster to ensure that the at-risk communities can withstand a similar or stronger shock in the future. In the present work, the authors analyzed the reconstruction paths through a comparative analysis of the perspective of a community in Japan and another in Chile, and their respective local governments. While both countries are at risk to tsunamis, they follow different reconstruction philosophies. Data was gathered through key informant interviews of community members and local government officials, by adapting and modifying the Building Resilience to Adapt to Climate Extremes and Disasters (BRACED) 3As framework to a tsunami scenario. The 3As represent anticipatory, adaptive, and absorptive capacities as well as transformative capacities and respondents were asked to rate this according to their perspectives. It was found that while both communities perceive that much is to be done in recovery, Kirikiri has a more holistic and similar perspective of the recovery with their government officials as compared to Dichato. This shows that community reconstruction and recovery from a disaster requires a holistic participation and understanding.

Original languageEnglish
Article number26
JournalGeosciences (Switzerland)
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

tsunami
disaster
local government
analysis
climate

Keywords

  • Chile
  • Disaster risk management
  • Japan
  • Tsunami recovery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

Valenzuela, V. P. B., Samarasekara, R. S. M., Kularathna, A. H. T. S., Perez, G. C. C., Norikazu, F., Crichton, R. N., ... Esteban, M. (2019). Comparative analysis of tsunami recovery strategies in small communities in Japan and Chile. Geosciences (Switzerland), 9(1), [26]. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9010026

Comparative analysis of tsunami recovery strategies in small communities in Japan and Chile. / Valenzuela, Ven Paolo Bruno; Samarasekara, Ratnayakage Sameera Maduranga; Kularathna, A. H.T.Shyam; Perez, G. Carlota Cubelos; Norikazu, Furukawa; Crichton, Richard Nathan; Quiroz, Marco; Yavar, Ramon; Izumi, Ikeda; Aranguiz, Rafael; Motoharu, Onuki; Esteban, Miguel.

In: Geosciences (Switzerland), Vol. 9, No. 1, 26, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valenzuela, VPB, Samarasekara, RSM, Kularathna, AHTS, Perez, GCC, Norikazu, F, Crichton, RN, Quiroz, M, Yavar, R, Izumi, I, Aranguiz, R, Motoharu, O & Esteban, M 2019, 'Comparative analysis of tsunami recovery strategies in small communities in Japan and Chile' Geosciences (Switzerland), vol. 9, no. 1, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9010026
Valenzuela VPB, Samarasekara RSM, Kularathna AHTS, Perez GCC, Norikazu F, Crichton RN et al. Comparative analysis of tsunami recovery strategies in small communities in Japan and Chile. Geosciences (Switzerland). 2019 Jan 1;9(1). 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9010026
Valenzuela, Ven Paolo Bruno ; Samarasekara, Ratnayakage Sameera Maduranga ; Kularathna, A. H.T.Shyam ; Perez, G. Carlota Cubelos ; Norikazu, Furukawa ; Crichton, Richard Nathan ; Quiroz, Marco ; Yavar, Ramon ; Izumi, Ikeda ; Aranguiz, Rafael ; Motoharu, Onuki ; Esteban, Miguel. / Comparative analysis of tsunami recovery strategies in small communities in Japan and Chile. In: Geosciences (Switzerland). 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 1.
@article{b38799f6c7ab454799fc2a4227d0c3ac,
title = "Comparative analysis of tsunami recovery strategies in small communities in Japan and Chile",
abstract = "The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction emphasizes the need to rebuild better after a disaster to ensure that the at-risk communities can withstand a similar or stronger shock in the future. In the present work, the authors analyzed the reconstruction paths through a comparative analysis of the perspective of a community in Japan and another in Chile, and their respective local governments. While both countries are at risk to tsunamis, they follow different reconstruction philosophies. Data was gathered through key informant interviews of community members and local government officials, by adapting and modifying the Building Resilience to Adapt to Climate Extremes and Disasters (BRACED) 3As framework to a tsunami scenario. The 3As represent anticipatory, adaptive, and absorptive capacities as well as transformative capacities and respondents were asked to rate this according to their perspectives. It was found that while both communities perceive that much is to be done in recovery, Kirikiri has a more holistic and similar perspective of the recovery with their government officials as compared to Dichato. This shows that community reconstruction and recovery from a disaster requires a holistic participation and understanding.",
keywords = "Chile, Disaster risk management, Japan, Tsunami recovery",
author = "Valenzuela, {Ven Paolo Bruno} and Samarasekara, {Ratnayakage Sameera Maduranga} and Kularathna, {A. H.T.Shyam} and Perez, {G. Carlota Cubelos} and Furukawa Norikazu and Crichton, {Richard Nathan} and Marco Quiroz and Ramon Yavar and Ikeda Izumi and Rafael Aranguiz and Onuki Motoharu and Miguel Esteban",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/geosciences9010026",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Geosciences (Switzerland)",
issn = "2076-3263",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative analysis of tsunami recovery strategies in small communities in Japan and Chile

AU - Valenzuela, Ven Paolo Bruno

AU - Samarasekara, Ratnayakage Sameera Maduranga

AU - Kularathna, A. H.T.Shyam

AU - Perez, G. Carlota Cubelos

AU - Norikazu, Furukawa

AU - Crichton, Richard Nathan

AU - Quiroz, Marco

AU - Yavar, Ramon

AU - Izumi, Ikeda

AU - Aranguiz, Rafael

AU - Motoharu, Onuki

AU - Esteban, Miguel

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction emphasizes the need to rebuild better after a disaster to ensure that the at-risk communities can withstand a similar or stronger shock in the future. In the present work, the authors analyzed the reconstruction paths through a comparative analysis of the perspective of a community in Japan and another in Chile, and their respective local governments. While both countries are at risk to tsunamis, they follow different reconstruction philosophies. Data was gathered through key informant interviews of community members and local government officials, by adapting and modifying the Building Resilience to Adapt to Climate Extremes and Disasters (BRACED) 3As framework to a tsunami scenario. The 3As represent anticipatory, adaptive, and absorptive capacities as well as transformative capacities and respondents were asked to rate this according to their perspectives. It was found that while both communities perceive that much is to be done in recovery, Kirikiri has a more holistic and similar perspective of the recovery with their government officials as compared to Dichato. This shows that community reconstruction and recovery from a disaster requires a holistic participation and understanding.

AB - The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction emphasizes the need to rebuild better after a disaster to ensure that the at-risk communities can withstand a similar or stronger shock in the future. In the present work, the authors analyzed the reconstruction paths through a comparative analysis of the perspective of a community in Japan and another in Chile, and their respective local governments. While both countries are at risk to tsunamis, they follow different reconstruction philosophies. Data was gathered through key informant interviews of community members and local government officials, by adapting and modifying the Building Resilience to Adapt to Climate Extremes and Disasters (BRACED) 3As framework to a tsunami scenario. The 3As represent anticipatory, adaptive, and absorptive capacities as well as transformative capacities and respondents were asked to rate this according to their perspectives. It was found that while both communities perceive that much is to be done in recovery, Kirikiri has a more holistic and similar perspective of the recovery with their government officials as compared to Dichato. This shows that community reconstruction and recovery from a disaster requires a holistic participation and understanding.

KW - Chile

KW - Disaster risk management

KW - Japan

KW - Tsunami recovery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060401525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060401525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/geosciences9010026

DO - 10.3390/geosciences9010026

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Geosciences (Switzerland)

JF - Geosciences (Switzerland)

SN - 2076-3263

IS - 1

M1 - 26

ER -