Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms: Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming

Fumiya Kato, Kazunori Sakamoto, Hironori Washizaki, Yoshiaki Fukazawa

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    There are many programming paradigms for the separation of concerns (SoC). Each paradigm modularizes concerns in a different way. Context-oriented programming (COP) has been developed as a supplement to objectoriented programming (OOP), which is one of the most widely used paradigms for SoC. It modularizes concerns that are difficult for OOP. In this paper, we focus on three paradigms - OOP, aspect-oriented programming (proposed as a supplement to OOP that has a different approach from COP), and COP - And study whether COP can modularize concerns better than other two paradigms in given situations. Then we determine the reasons why COP can or cannot better modularize concerns.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE
    PublisherKnowledge Systems Institute Graduate School
    Pages594-599
    Number of pages6
    Volume2013-January
    EditionJanuary
    Publication statusPublished - 2013
    Event25th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE 2013 - Boston, United States
    Duration: 2013 Jun 272013 Jun 29

    Other

    Other25th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE 2013
    CountryUnited States
    CityBoston
    Period13/6/2713/6/29

    Fingerprint

    Aspect oriented programming

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Software

    Cite this

    Kato, F., Sakamoto, K., Washizaki, H., & Fukazawa, Y. (2013). Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms: Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE (January ed., Vol. 2013-January, pp. 594-599). Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School.

    Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms : Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming. / Kato, Fumiya; Sakamoto, Kazunori; Washizaki, Hironori; Fukazawa, Yoshiaki.

    Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE. Vol. 2013-January January. ed. Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School, 2013. p. 594-599.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    Kato, F, Sakamoto, K, Washizaki, H & Fukazawa, Y 2013, Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms: Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE. January edn, vol. 2013-January, Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School, pp. 594-599, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE 2013, Boston, United States, 13/6/27.
    Kato F, Sakamoto K, Washizaki H, Fukazawa Y. Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms: Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE. January ed. Vol. 2013-January. Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School. 2013. p. 594-599
    Kato, Fumiya ; Sakamoto, Kazunori ; Washizaki, Hironori ; Fukazawa, Yoshiaki. / Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms : Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming. Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE. Vol. 2013-January January. ed. Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School, 2013. pp. 594-599
    @inproceedings{bd151966165e414ab06999015b24842f,
    title = "Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms: Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming",
    abstract = "There are many programming paradigms for the separation of concerns (SoC). Each paradigm modularizes concerns in a different way. Context-oriented programming (COP) has been developed as a supplement to objectoriented programming (OOP), which is one of the most widely used paradigms for SoC. It modularizes concerns that are difficult for OOP. In this paper, we focus on three paradigms - OOP, aspect-oriented programming (proposed as a supplement to OOP that has a different approach from COP), and COP - And study whether COP can modularize concerns better than other two paradigms in given situations. Then we determine the reasons why COP can or cannot better modularize concerns.",
    author = "Fumiya Kato and Kazunori Sakamoto and Hironori Washizaki and Yoshiaki Fukazawa",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",
    volume = "2013-January",
    pages = "594--599",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE",
    publisher = "Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School",
    edition = "January",

    }

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms

    T2 - Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming

    AU - Kato, Fumiya

    AU - Sakamoto, Kazunori

    AU - Washizaki, Hironori

    AU - Fukazawa, Yoshiaki

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - There are many programming paradigms for the separation of concerns (SoC). Each paradigm modularizes concerns in a different way. Context-oriented programming (COP) has been developed as a supplement to objectoriented programming (OOP), which is one of the most widely used paradigms for SoC. It modularizes concerns that are difficult for OOP. In this paper, we focus on three paradigms - OOP, aspect-oriented programming (proposed as a supplement to OOP that has a different approach from COP), and COP - And study whether COP can modularize concerns better than other two paradigms in given situations. Then we determine the reasons why COP can or cannot better modularize concerns.

    AB - There are many programming paradigms for the separation of concerns (SoC). Each paradigm modularizes concerns in a different way. Context-oriented programming (COP) has been developed as a supplement to objectoriented programming (OOP), which is one of the most widely used paradigms for SoC. It modularizes concerns that are difficult for OOP. In this paper, we focus on three paradigms - OOP, aspect-oriented programming (proposed as a supplement to OOP that has a different approach from COP), and COP - And study whether COP can modularize concerns better than other two paradigms in given situations. Then we determine the reasons why COP can or cannot better modularize concerns.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937718856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937718856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Conference contribution

    AN - SCOPUS:84937718856

    VL - 2013-January

    SP - 594

    EP - 599

    BT - Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE

    PB - Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School

    ER -