Comparison between three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network method and 3D finite element method for magnetic-field computation

Yon Do Chun; Jae Eung Oh; Yasushi Fujishima; Shinji Wakao; Ju Lee; Yun Hyun Cho

doi:10.1063/1.1853195

Comparison between three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network method and 3D finite element method for magnetic-field computation

Yon Do Chun^*, Jae Eung Oh, Yasushi Fujishima, Shinji Wakao, Ju Lee, Yun Hyun Cho

^*Corresponding author for this work

School of Advanced Science and Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, in order to investigate the merits of three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network (EMCN) method, a 3D standard benchmark model proposed by the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan is analyzed. We also examine the accuracy of analysis results, the computer storage, and the computation time through the systematical comparison between 3D EMCN method and 3D finite element method based on hexahedral edge element. The incomplete Cholesky conjugate gradient method was selected for the solver. From the results, we can confirm the usefulness of 3D EMCN method.

Original language	English
Article number	10E105
Journal	Journal of Applied Physics
Volume	97
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1853195
Publication status	Published - 2005 May 15

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Physics and Astronomy(all)

Access to Document

10.1063/1.1853195

Cite this

@article{fb740882c88244e0a4ba7538acba4472,

title = "Comparison between three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network method and 3D finite element method for magnetic-field computation",

abstract = "In this article, in order to investigate the merits of three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network (EMCN) method, a 3D standard benchmark model proposed by the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan is analyzed. We also examine the accuracy of analysis results, the computer storage, and the computation time through the systematical comparison between 3D EMCN method and 3D finite element method based on hexahedral edge element. The incomplete Cholesky conjugate gradient method was selected for the solver. From the results, we can confirm the usefulness of 3D EMCN method.",

author = "Chun, {Yon Do} and Oh, {Jae Eung} and Yasushi Fujishima and Shinji Wakao and Ju Lee and Cho, {Yun Hyun}",

note = "Funding Information: This work was financially supported in part by Brain Korea 21 project and MOCIE through EIRC program in 2004.",

year = "2005",

month = may,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1063/1.1853195",

language = "English",

volume = "97",

journal = "Journal of Applied Physics",

issn = "0021-8979",

publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison between three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network method and 3D finite element method for magnetic-field computation

AU - Chun, Yon Do

AU - Oh, Jae Eung

AU - Fujishima, Yasushi

AU - Wakao, Shinji

AU - Lee, Ju

AU - Cho, Yun Hyun

N1 - Funding Information: This work was financially supported in part by Brain Korea 21 project and MOCIE through EIRC program in 2004.

PY - 2005/5/15

Y1 - 2005/5/15

N2 - In this article, in order to investigate the merits of three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network (EMCN) method, a 3D standard benchmark model proposed by the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan is analyzed. We also examine the accuracy of analysis results, the computer storage, and the computation time through the systematical comparison between 3D EMCN method and 3D finite element method based on hexahedral edge element. The incomplete Cholesky conjugate gradient method was selected for the solver. From the results, we can confirm the usefulness of 3D EMCN method.

AB - In this article, in order to investigate the merits of three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network (EMCN) method, a 3D standard benchmark model proposed by the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan is analyzed. We also examine the accuracy of analysis results, the computer storage, and the computation time through the systematical comparison between 3D EMCN method and 3D finite element method based on hexahedral edge element. The incomplete Cholesky conjugate gradient method was selected for the solver. From the results, we can confirm the usefulness of 3D EMCN method.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20944432872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20944432872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1063/1.1853195

DO - 10.1063/1.1853195

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:20944432872

SN - 0021-8979

VL - 97

JO - Journal of Applied Physics

JF - Journal of Applied Physics

IS - 10

M1 - 10E105

ER -

Comparison between three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network method and 3D finite element method for magnetic-field computation

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this