TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of18F-fluoride PET/CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT and bone scintigraphy (planar and SPECT) in detection of bone metastases of differentiated thyroid cancer
T2 - A pilot study
AU - Ota, Naotoshi
AU - Kato, Katsuhiko
AU - Iwano, Shingo
AU - Ito, Shinji
AU - Abe, Shinji
AU - Fujita, Naotoshi
AU - Yamashiro, Keiichi
AU - Yamamoto, Seiichi
AU - Naganawa, Shinji
PY - 2014/2/1
Y1 - 2014/2/1
N2 - Objective: We compared the efficacies of 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography (18F-fluoride PET)/CT, 18F- fludeoxyglucose PET (18F-FDG PET)/CT, and 99mTc bone scintigraphy [planar and single photon emission CT (SPECT)] for the detection of bone metastases in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods: We examined 11 patients (8 females and 3 males; mean age ± standard deviation, 61.9 ± 8.7 years) with DTC who had been suspected of having bone metastases after total thyroidectomy and were hospitalized to be given 131I therapy. Bone metastases were verified either when positive findings were obtained on both 131I scintigraphy and CT or when MRI findings were positive if MRI was performed. Results: Metastases were confirmed in 24 (13.6%) of 176 bone segments in 9 (81.8%) of the 11 patients. The sensitivities of 18F-fluoride PET/CT and 99mTc bone scintigraphy (SPECT) were significantly higher than those of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 99mTc bone scintigraphy (planar) (p , 0.05). The accuracies of 18F- fluoride PET/CT and 99mTc bone scintigraphy (SPECT) were significantly higher than that of 99mTc bone scintigraphy (planar) ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: The sensitivity and accuracy of 18F-fluoride PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases of DTC are significantly higher than those of 99mTc bone scintigraphy (planar). However, the sensitivity and accuracy of 99mTc bone scintigraphy (planar) are improved near to those of 18F-fluoride PET/CT when SPECT is added to a planar scan. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/CT is significantly lower than that of 18F-fluoride PET/CT or 99mTc bone scintigraphy (SPECT). Advances in knowledge: This article has demonstrated first the high efficacy of 18F-fluoride PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases of DTC.
AB - Objective: We compared the efficacies of 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography (18F-fluoride PET)/CT, 18F- fludeoxyglucose PET (18F-FDG PET)/CT, and 99mTc bone scintigraphy [planar and single photon emission CT (SPECT)] for the detection of bone metastases in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods: We examined 11 patients (8 females and 3 males; mean age ± standard deviation, 61.9 ± 8.7 years) with DTC who had been suspected of having bone metastases after total thyroidectomy and were hospitalized to be given 131I therapy. Bone metastases were verified either when positive findings were obtained on both 131I scintigraphy and CT or when MRI findings were positive if MRI was performed. Results: Metastases were confirmed in 24 (13.6%) of 176 bone segments in 9 (81.8%) of the 11 patients. The sensitivities of 18F-fluoride PET/CT and 99mTc bone scintigraphy (SPECT) were significantly higher than those of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 99mTc bone scintigraphy (planar) (p , 0.05). The accuracies of 18F- fluoride PET/CT and 99mTc bone scintigraphy (SPECT) were significantly higher than that of 99mTc bone scintigraphy (planar) ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: The sensitivity and accuracy of 18F-fluoride PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases of DTC are significantly higher than those of 99mTc bone scintigraphy (planar). However, the sensitivity and accuracy of 99mTc bone scintigraphy (planar) are improved near to those of 18F-fluoride PET/CT when SPECT is added to a planar scan. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/CT is significantly lower than that of 18F-fluoride PET/CT or 99mTc bone scintigraphy (SPECT). Advances in knowledge: This article has demonstrated first the high efficacy of 18F-fluoride PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases of DTC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893411842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893411842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1259/bjr.20130444
DO - 10.1259/bjr.20130444
M3 - Article
C2 - 24297809
AN - SCOPUS:84893411842
SN - 0007-1285
VL - 87
JO - British Journal of Radiology
JF - British Journal of Radiology
IS - 1034
M1 - 20130444
ER -