Compensation of neural delays in visual-motor behaviour: No evidence for shorter afferent delays for visual motion

Romi Nijhawan, Katsumi Watanabe, Beena Khurana, Shinsuke Shimojo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are significant neural transmission and processing delays within the nervous system. How then are behaviours observed both in nature and high-speed ball games, which require temporal accuracy to within several milliseconds, possible? Until recently, most investigators attributed the observed success in interceptive behaviours to learning or prediction built into motor programs that take these delays into account. Several investigators have proposed, however, that sensory mechanisms also contribute to compensation. Sensory compensation is particularly important when moving objects are the targets of interceptive behaviour, as in this case neural delays in the visual system could lead to errors in the communication of crucial position information of the object of interest. However, given the biological significance of visual motion the visual system could have evolved neural pathways optimized for the rapid transmission of motion signals. Alternatively, the visual system could take a sample of visual motion and compensate for the delays through prediction based on the sample. This mechanism is the visual analogue of the previously proposed "internal forward model" for motor control. We conducted four experiments using the flash-lag effect to ask if the nervous system is naturally geared to processing moving items with a speed greater than stationary flashes. Our results show that the nervous system does not process moving items more quickly than stationary flashes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-298
Number of pages24
JournalVisual Cognition
Volume11
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004 Feb
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nervous System
Research Personnel
Neural Pathways
Synaptic Transmission
Communication
Learning
Flash
Prediction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Compensation of neural delays in visual-motor behaviour : No evidence for shorter afferent delays for visual motion. / Nijhawan, Romi; Watanabe, Katsumi; Khurana, Beena; Shimojo, Shinsuke.

In: Visual Cognition, Vol. 11, No. 2-3, 02.2004, p. 275-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{73ecdf6feba24a33ac6d3575923bdc9f,
title = "Compensation of neural delays in visual-motor behaviour: No evidence for shorter afferent delays for visual motion",
abstract = "There are significant neural transmission and processing delays within the nervous system. How then are behaviours observed both in nature and high-speed ball games, which require temporal accuracy to within several milliseconds, possible? Until recently, most investigators attributed the observed success in interceptive behaviours to learning or prediction built into motor programs that take these delays into account. Several investigators have proposed, however, that sensory mechanisms also contribute to compensation. Sensory compensation is particularly important when moving objects are the targets of interceptive behaviour, as in this case neural delays in the visual system could lead to errors in the communication of crucial position information of the object of interest. However, given the biological significance of visual motion the visual system could have evolved neural pathways optimized for the rapid transmission of motion signals. Alternatively, the visual system could take a sample of visual motion and compensate for the delays through prediction based on the sample. This mechanism is the visual analogue of the previously proposed {"}internal forward model{"} for motor control. We conducted four experiments using the flash-lag effect to ask if the nervous system is naturally geared to processing moving items with a speed greater than stationary flashes. Our results show that the nervous system does not process moving items more quickly than stationary flashes.",
author = "Romi Nijhawan and Katsumi Watanabe and Beena Khurana and Shinsuke Shimojo",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1080/13506280344000347",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "275--298",
journal = "Visual Cognition",
issn = "1350-6285",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Compensation of neural delays in visual-motor behaviour

T2 - No evidence for shorter afferent delays for visual motion

AU - Nijhawan, Romi

AU - Watanabe, Katsumi

AU - Khurana, Beena

AU - Shimojo, Shinsuke

PY - 2004/2

Y1 - 2004/2

N2 - There are significant neural transmission and processing delays within the nervous system. How then are behaviours observed both in nature and high-speed ball games, which require temporal accuracy to within several milliseconds, possible? Until recently, most investigators attributed the observed success in interceptive behaviours to learning or prediction built into motor programs that take these delays into account. Several investigators have proposed, however, that sensory mechanisms also contribute to compensation. Sensory compensation is particularly important when moving objects are the targets of interceptive behaviour, as in this case neural delays in the visual system could lead to errors in the communication of crucial position information of the object of interest. However, given the biological significance of visual motion the visual system could have evolved neural pathways optimized for the rapid transmission of motion signals. Alternatively, the visual system could take a sample of visual motion and compensate for the delays through prediction based on the sample. This mechanism is the visual analogue of the previously proposed "internal forward model" for motor control. We conducted four experiments using the flash-lag effect to ask if the nervous system is naturally geared to processing moving items with a speed greater than stationary flashes. Our results show that the nervous system does not process moving items more quickly than stationary flashes.

AB - There are significant neural transmission and processing delays within the nervous system. How then are behaviours observed both in nature and high-speed ball games, which require temporal accuracy to within several milliseconds, possible? Until recently, most investigators attributed the observed success in interceptive behaviours to learning or prediction built into motor programs that take these delays into account. Several investigators have proposed, however, that sensory mechanisms also contribute to compensation. Sensory compensation is particularly important when moving objects are the targets of interceptive behaviour, as in this case neural delays in the visual system could lead to errors in the communication of crucial position information of the object of interest. However, given the biological significance of visual motion the visual system could have evolved neural pathways optimized for the rapid transmission of motion signals. Alternatively, the visual system could take a sample of visual motion and compensate for the delays through prediction based on the sample. This mechanism is the visual analogue of the previously proposed "internal forward model" for motor control. We conducted four experiments using the flash-lag effect to ask if the nervous system is naturally geared to processing moving items with a speed greater than stationary flashes. Our results show that the nervous system does not process moving items more quickly than stationary flashes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542716591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542716591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13506280344000347

DO - 10.1080/13506280344000347

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:1542716591

VL - 11

SP - 275

EP - 298

JO - Visual Cognition

JF - Visual Cognition

SN - 1350-6285

IS - 2-3

ER -