Complicated electronic process of C-C σ-bond activation of cyclopropene by ruthenium and iridium complexes

Theoretical study

Atsushi Ishikawa, Yudai Tanimura, Yoshihide Nakao, Hirofumi Sato, Shigeyoshi Sakaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

C-C σ-bond activation of cyclopropene by RuCl2(PPh 3)2 and IrCl(CO)(PMe3)2 was theoretically investigated. The activation barrier and the reaction energy calculated here indicate that the reaction occurs more easily by the ruthenium complex than by the iridium complex, which is consistent with the experimental results that the Ru-vinylcarbene species is formed but the Ir-vinylcarbene is not. The valence bond analysis of the CASSCF wave function disclosed that the Ir-vinylcarbene bond is significantly weaker than that of the Ru complex because the d6 square pyramidal complex of Ru is more favorable than the d8 complex of Ir for this bonding interaction. In both the Ru and Ir systems, a precursor complex is formed by coordination of the C 1=C2 double bond of cyclopropene with the metal center, where C1 and C2 are sp2 carbons and C 3 is an sp3 carbon. In the transition state, one C-C single bond (named C1-C3) is almost broken, but the M-C1 bond (M = Ru or Ir) and another C-C single bond (named C 2-C3) are becoming stronger. When moving from the transition state to a metal-vinylcarbene product, the C1=C 2 double bond changes to the C1-C2 single bond with the concomitant change of the C2-C3 single bond to the C2=C3 double bond. To induce these bond formation and bond breaking processes, the valence state of the metal center must change in the reaction. The promotion energy to the valence state becomes smaller in the ruthenium reaction system when going from the reactant to the product but becomes considerably larger in the iridium reaction system. This is the reason that the C-C σ-bond cleavage of cyclopropene occurs more easily in the ruthenium complex than in the iridium complex. The difference in promotion energy between the ruthenium and iridium systems is reasonably interpreted in terms of d-d orbital splitting by ligand-field and d electron number.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8189-8199
Number of pages11
JournalOrganometallics
Volume31
Issue number23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Dec 10
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Iridium
Ruthenium
iridium
ruthenium
Chemical activation
activation
Metals
electronics
promotion
valence
Carbon
metals
Carbon Monoxide
Wave functions
carbon
products
energy
cleavage
Ligands
vinylcarbene

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organic Chemistry
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Inorganic Chemistry

Cite this

Complicated electronic process of C-C σ-bond activation of cyclopropene by ruthenium and iridium complexes : Theoretical study. / Ishikawa, Atsushi; Tanimura, Yudai; Nakao, Yoshihide; Sato, Hirofumi; Sakaki, Shigeyoshi.

In: Organometallics, Vol. 31, No. 23, 10.12.2012, p. 8189-8199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ishikawa, Atsushi ; Tanimura, Yudai ; Nakao, Yoshihide ; Sato, Hirofumi ; Sakaki, Shigeyoshi. / Complicated electronic process of C-C σ-bond activation of cyclopropene by ruthenium and iridium complexes : Theoretical study. In: Organometallics. 2012 ; Vol. 31, No. 23. pp. 8189-8199.
@article{c277741a032046e08104080c88bc9340,
title = "Complicated electronic process of C-C σ-bond activation of cyclopropene by ruthenium and iridium complexes: Theoretical study",
abstract = "C-C σ-bond activation of cyclopropene by RuCl2(PPh 3)2 and IrCl(CO)(PMe3)2 was theoretically investigated. The activation barrier and the reaction energy calculated here indicate that the reaction occurs more easily by the ruthenium complex than by the iridium complex, which is consistent with the experimental results that the Ru-vinylcarbene species is formed but the Ir-vinylcarbene is not. The valence bond analysis of the CASSCF wave function disclosed that the Ir-vinylcarbene bond is significantly weaker than that of the Ru complex because the d6 square pyramidal complex of Ru is more favorable than the d8 complex of Ir for this bonding interaction. In both the Ru and Ir systems, a precursor complex is formed by coordination of the C 1=C2 double bond of cyclopropene with the metal center, where C1 and C2 are sp2 carbons and C 3 is an sp3 carbon. In the transition state, one C-C single bond (named C1-C3) is almost broken, but the M-C1 bond (M = Ru or Ir) and another C-C single bond (named C 2-C3) are becoming stronger. When moving from the transition state to a metal-vinylcarbene product, the C1=C 2 double bond changes to the C1-C2 single bond with the concomitant change of the C2-C3 single bond to the C2=C3 double bond. To induce these bond formation and bond breaking processes, the valence state of the metal center must change in the reaction. The promotion energy to the valence state becomes smaller in the ruthenium reaction system when going from the reactant to the product but becomes considerably larger in the iridium reaction system. This is the reason that the C-C σ-bond cleavage of cyclopropene occurs more easily in the ruthenium complex than in the iridium complex. The difference in promotion energy between the ruthenium and iridium systems is reasonably interpreted in terms of d-d orbital splitting by ligand-field and d electron number.",
author = "Atsushi Ishikawa and Yudai Tanimura and Yoshihide Nakao and Hirofumi Sato and Shigeyoshi Sakaki",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1021/om300811g",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "8189--8199",
journal = "Organometallics",
issn = "0276-7333",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complicated electronic process of C-C σ-bond activation of cyclopropene by ruthenium and iridium complexes

T2 - Theoretical study

AU - Ishikawa, Atsushi

AU - Tanimura, Yudai

AU - Nakao, Yoshihide

AU - Sato, Hirofumi

AU - Sakaki, Shigeyoshi

PY - 2012/12/10

Y1 - 2012/12/10

N2 - C-C σ-bond activation of cyclopropene by RuCl2(PPh 3)2 and IrCl(CO)(PMe3)2 was theoretically investigated. The activation barrier and the reaction energy calculated here indicate that the reaction occurs more easily by the ruthenium complex than by the iridium complex, which is consistent with the experimental results that the Ru-vinylcarbene species is formed but the Ir-vinylcarbene is not. The valence bond analysis of the CASSCF wave function disclosed that the Ir-vinylcarbene bond is significantly weaker than that of the Ru complex because the d6 square pyramidal complex of Ru is more favorable than the d8 complex of Ir for this bonding interaction. In both the Ru and Ir systems, a precursor complex is formed by coordination of the C 1=C2 double bond of cyclopropene with the metal center, where C1 and C2 are sp2 carbons and C 3 is an sp3 carbon. In the transition state, one C-C single bond (named C1-C3) is almost broken, but the M-C1 bond (M = Ru or Ir) and another C-C single bond (named C 2-C3) are becoming stronger. When moving from the transition state to a metal-vinylcarbene product, the C1=C 2 double bond changes to the C1-C2 single bond with the concomitant change of the C2-C3 single bond to the C2=C3 double bond. To induce these bond formation and bond breaking processes, the valence state of the metal center must change in the reaction. The promotion energy to the valence state becomes smaller in the ruthenium reaction system when going from the reactant to the product but becomes considerably larger in the iridium reaction system. This is the reason that the C-C σ-bond cleavage of cyclopropene occurs more easily in the ruthenium complex than in the iridium complex. The difference in promotion energy between the ruthenium and iridium systems is reasonably interpreted in terms of d-d orbital splitting by ligand-field and d electron number.

AB - C-C σ-bond activation of cyclopropene by RuCl2(PPh 3)2 and IrCl(CO)(PMe3)2 was theoretically investigated. The activation barrier and the reaction energy calculated here indicate that the reaction occurs more easily by the ruthenium complex than by the iridium complex, which is consistent with the experimental results that the Ru-vinylcarbene species is formed but the Ir-vinylcarbene is not. The valence bond analysis of the CASSCF wave function disclosed that the Ir-vinylcarbene bond is significantly weaker than that of the Ru complex because the d6 square pyramidal complex of Ru is more favorable than the d8 complex of Ir for this bonding interaction. In both the Ru and Ir systems, a precursor complex is formed by coordination of the C 1=C2 double bond of cyclopropene with the metal center, where C1 and C2 are sp2 carbons and C 3 is an sp3 carbon. In the transition state, one C-C single bond (named C1-C3) is almost broken, but the M-C1 bond (M = Ru or Ir) and another C-C single bond (named C 2-C3) are becoming stronger. When moving from the transition state to a metal-vinylcarbene product, the C1=C 2 double bond changes to the C1-C2 single bond with the concomitant change of the C2-C3 single bond to the C2=C3 double bond. To induce these bond formation and bond breaking processes, the valence state of the metal center must change in the reaction. The promotion energy to the valence state becomes smaller in the ruthenium reaction system when going from the reactant to the product but becomes considerably larger in the iridium reaction system. This is the reason that the C-C σ-bond cleavage of cyclopropene occurs more easily in the ruthenium complex than in the iridium complex. The difference in promotion energy between the ruthenium and iridium systems is reasonably interpreted in terms of d-d orbital splitting by ligand-field and d electron number.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870915790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870915790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/om300811g

DO - 10.1021/om300811g

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 8189

EP - 8199

JO - Organometallics

JF - Organometallics

SN - 0276-7333

IS - 23

ER -