Concepts to utilize in describing thermoregulation and neurophysiological evidence for how the system works

Kazuyuki Kanosue, Larry I. Crawshaw, Kei Nagashima, Tamae Yoda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We would like to emphasize about the system involved with homeostatic maintenance of body temperature. First, the primary mission of the thermoregulatory system is to defend core temperature (T core) against changes in ambient temperature (T a), the most frequently encountered disturbance for the system. T a should be treated as a feedforward input to the system, which has not been adequately recognized by thermal physiologists. Second, homeostatic demands from outside the thermoregulatory system may require or produce an altered T core, such as fever (demand from the immune system). There are also conditions where some thermoregulatory effectors might be better not recruited due to demands from other homeostatic systems, such as during dehydration or fasting. Third, many experiments have supported the original assertion of Satinoff that multiple thermoregulatory effectors are controlled by different and relatively independent neuronal circuits. However, it would also be of value to be able to characterize strictly regulatory properties of the entire system by providing a clear definition for the level of regulation. Based on the assumption that T core is the regulated variable of the thermoregulatory system, regulated T core is defined as the T core that pertains within the range of normothermic T a (Gordon in temperature and toxicology: an integrative, comparative, and environmental approach, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2005), i.e., the T a range in which an animal maintains a stable T core. The proposed approach would facilitate the categorization and evaluation of how normal biological alterations, physiological stressors, and pathological conditions modify temperature regulation. In any case, of overriding importance is to recognize the means by which an alteration in T core (and modification of associated effector activities) increases the overall viability of the organism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-11
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology
Volume109
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 May

Fingerprint

Body Temperature Regulation
Temperature
Body Temperature
Dehydration
Toxicology
Immune System
Fasting
Fever
Hot Temperature
Maintenance

Keywords

  • Ambient temperature
  • Core temperature
  • Feedforward
  • Negative feedback

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Concepts to utilize in describing thermoregulation and neurophysiological evidence for how the system works. / Kanosue, Kazuyuki; Crawshaw, Larry I.; Nagashima, Kei; Yoda, Tamae.

In: European Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 109, No. 1, 05.2010, p. 5-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e7d719fe5954401488044e6c1b500abd,
title = "Concepts to utilize in describing thermoregulation and neurophysiological evidence for how the system works",
abstract = "We would like to emphasize about the system involved with homeostatic maintenance of body temperature. First, the primary mission of the thermoregulatory system is to defend core temperature (T core) against changes in ambient temperature (T a), the most frequently encountered disturbance for the system. T a should be treated as a feedforward input to the system, which has not been adequately recognized by thermal physiologists. Second, homeostatic demands from outside the thermoregulatory system may require or produce an altered T core, such as fever (demand from the immune system). There are also conditions where some thermoregulatory effectors might be better not recruited due to demands from other homeostatic systems, such as during dehydration or fasting. Third, many experiments have supported the original assertion of Satinoff that multiple thermoregulatory effectors are controlled by different and relatively independent neuronal circuits. However, it would also be of value to be able to characterize strictly regulatory properties of the entire system by providing a clear definition for the level of regulation. Based on the assumption that T core is the regulated variable of the thermoregulatory system, regulated T core is defined as the T core that pertains within the range of normothermic T a (Gordon in temperature and toxicology: an integrative, comparative, and environmental approach, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2005), i.e., the T a range in which an animal maintains a stable T core. The proposed approach would facilitate the categorization and evaluation of how normal biological alterations, physiological stressors, and pathological conditions modify temperature regulation. In any case, of overriding importance is to recognize the means by which an alteration in T core (and modification of associated effector activities) increases the overall viability of the organism.",
keywords = "Ambient temperature, Core temperature, Feedforward, Negative feedback",
author = "Kazuyuki Kanosue and Crawshaw, {Larry I.} and Kei Nagashima and Tamae Yoda",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s00421-009-1256-6",
language = "English",
volume = "109",
pages = "5--11",
journal = "European Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "1439-6319",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concepts to utilize in describing thermoregulation and neurophysiological evidence for how the system works

AU - Kanosue, Kazuyuki

AU - Crawshaw, Larry I.

AU - Nagashima, Kei

AU - Yoda, Tamae

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - We would like to emphasize about the system involved with homeostatic maintenance of body temperature. First, the primary mission of the thermoregulatory system is to defend core temperature (T core) against changes in ambient temperature (T a), the most frequently encountered disturbance for the system. T a should be treated as a feedforward input to the system, which has not been adequately recognized by thermal physiologists. Second, homeostatic demands from outside the thermoregulatory system may require or produce an altered T core, such as fever (demand from the immune system). There are also conditions where some thermoregulatory effectors might be better not recruited due to demands from other homeostatic systems, such as during dehydration or fasting. Third, many experiments have supported the original assertion of Satinoff that multiple thermoregulatory effectors are controlled by different and relatively independent neuronal circuits. However, it would also be of value to be able to characterize strictly regulatory properties of the entire system by providing a clear definition for the level of regulation. Based on the assumption that T core is the regulated variable of the thermoregulatory system, regulated T core is defined as the T core that pertains within the range of normothermic T a (Gordon in temperature and toxicology: an integrative, comparative, and environmental approach, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2005), i.e., the T a range in which an animal maintains a stable T core. The proposed approach would facilitate the categorization and evaluation of how normal biological alterations, physiological stressors, and pathological conditions modify temperature regulation. In any case, of overriding importance is to recognize the means by which an alteration in T core (and modification of associated effector activities) increases the overall viability of the organism.

AB - We would like to emphasize about the system involved with homeostatic maintenance of body temperature. First, the primary mission of the thermoregulatory system is to defend core temperature (T core) against changes in ambient temperature (T a), the most frequently encountered disturbance for the system. T a should be treated as a feedforward input to the system, which has not been adequately recognized by thermal physiologists. Second, homeostatic demands from outside the thermoregulatory system may require or produce an altered T core, such as fever (demand from the immune system). There are also conditions where some thermoregulatory effectors might be better not recruited due to demands from other homeostatic systems, such as during dehydration or fasting. Third, many experiments have supported the original assertion of Satinoff that multiple thermoregulatory effectors are controlled by different and relatively independent neuronal circuits. However, it would also be of value to be able to characterize strictly regulatory properties of the entire system by providing a clear definition for the level of regulation. Based on the assumption that T core is the regulated variable of the thermoregulatory system, regulated T core is defined as the T core that pertains within the range of normothermic T a (Gordon in temperature and toxicology: an integrative, comparative, and environmental approach, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2005), i.e., the T a range in which an animal maintains a stable T core. The proposed approach would facilitate the categorization and evaluation of how normal biological alterations, physiological stressors, and pathological conditions modify temperature regulation. In any case, of overriding importance is to recognize the means by which an alteration in T core (and modification of associated effector activities) increases the overall viability of the organism.

KW - Ambient temperature

KW - Core temperature

KW - Feedforward

KW - Negative feedback

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951092365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951092365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00421-009-1256-6

DO - 10.1007/s00421-009-1256-6

M3 - Article

VL - 109

SP - 5

EP - 11

JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 1439-6319

IS - 1

ER -