Conceptual influence on the flash-lag effect and representational momentum

Masayoshi Nagai, Mutsumi Suganuma, Romi Nijhawan, Jennifer J. Freyd, Geoffrey Miller, Katsumi Watanabe

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction When judging the position of a moving object, human observers do not perceive and memorize the moving object's correct position. There are two known phenomena in judged position errors of a moving object, representational momentum (RM) and the flash-lag effect (FLE), both of which we consider here. RM was originally reported by Freyd and Finke (1984). Freyd and colleagues displayed a series of still frames to imply the rotation of a rectangle (e.g., Freyd & Finke 1984, 1985; Freyd & Johnson 1987). Observers saw three views of a rectangle at different rotations about its center, with 250 msec display duration with 250 msec interstimulus interval. The fourth rectangle was presented as a probe 250 msec after the third frame presentation. The rotation of the probe was selected from possible positions symmetrically distributed around the actual third position of the rectangle. Observers were asked whether the rectangle in the third frame (the last frame of the motion sequence) was the same orientation as the probe. The results showed that their memory for the third orientation tended to be shifted in the direction of rotation. In other words, the orientation of the probe rectangle had to be rotated slightly further to be judged as being in the same position as the third rectangle. To account for the forward shift of the final position of a stimulus undergoing implied motion, some authors postulate that the dynamics of the representational system follow physical laws, such as momentum (representational momentum; Finke & Freyd 1985; Finke et al. 1986; Freyd 1987; Finke & Shyi 1988).

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSpace and Time in Perception and Action
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages366-378
Number of pages13
ISBN (Print)9780511750540, 9780521863186
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Nagai, M., Suganuma, M., Nijhawan, R., Freyd, J. J., Miller, G., & Watanabe, K. (2010). Conceptual influence on the flash-lag effect and representational momentum. In Space and Time in Perception and Action (pp. 366-378). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750540.021

Conceptual influence on the flash-lag effect and representational momentum. / Nagai, Masayoshi; Suganuma, Mutsumi; Nijhawan, Romi; Freyd, Jennifer J.; Miller, Geoffrey; Watanabe, Katsumi.

Space and Time in Perception and Action. Cambridge University Press, 2010. p. 366-378.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Nagai, M, Suganuma, M, Nijhawan, R, Freyd, JJ, Miller, G & Watanabe, K 2010, Conceptual influence on the flash-lag effect and representational momentum. in Space and Time in Perception and Action. Cambridge University Press, pp. 366-378. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750540.021
Nagai M, Suganuma M, Nijhawan R, Freyd JJ, Miller G, Watanabe K. Conceptual influence on the flash-lag effect and representational momentum. In Space and Time in Perception and Action. Cambridge University Press. 2010. p. 366-378 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750540.021
Nagai, Masayoshi ; Suganuma, Mutsumi ; Nijhawan, Romi ; Freyd, Jennifer J. ; Miller, Geoffrey ; Watanabe, Katsumi. / Conceptual influence on the flash-lag effect and representational momentum. Space and Time in Perception and Action. Cambridge University Press, 2010. pp. 366-378
@inbook{2a6006b9ec974c30b53b90dc654df843,
title = "Conceptual influence on the flash-lag effect and representational momentum",
abstract = "Introduction When judging the position of a moving object, human observers do not perceive and memorize the moving object's correct position. There are two known phenomena in judged position errors of a moving object, representational momentum (RM) and the flash-lag effect (FLE), both of which we consider here. RM was originally reported by Freyd and Finke (1984). Freyd and colleagues displayed a series of still frames to imply the rotation of a rectangle (e.g., Freyd & Finke 1984, 1985; Freyd & Johnson 1987). Observers saw three views of a rectangle at different rotations about its center, with 250 msec display duration with 250 msec interstimulus interval. The fourth rectangle was presented as a probe 250 msec after the third frame presentation. The rotation of the probe was selected from possible positions symmetrically distributed around the actual third position of the rectangle. Observers were asked whether the rectangle in the third frame (the last frame of the motion sequence) was the same orientation as the probe. The results showed that their memory for the third orientation tended to be shifted in the direction of rotation. In other words, the orientation of the probe rectangle had to be rotated slightly further to be judged as being in the same position as the third rectangle. To account for the forward shift of the final position of a stimulus undergoing implied motion, some authors postulate that the dynamics of the representational system follow physical laws, such as momentum (representational momentum; Finke & Freyd 1985; Finke et al. 1986; Freyd 1987; Finke & Shyi 1988).",
author = "Masayoshi Nagai and Mutsumi Suganuma and Romi Nijhawan and Freyd, {Jennifer J.} and Geoffrey Miller and Katsumi Watanabe",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511750540.021",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780511750540",
pages = "366--378",
booktitle = "Space and Time in Perception and Action",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Conceptual influence on the flash-lag effect and representational momentum

AU - Nagai, Masayoshi

AU - Suganuma, Mutsumi

AU - Nijhawan, Romi

AU - Freyd, Jennifer J.

AU - Miller, Geoffrey

AU - Watanabe, Katsumi

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Introduction When judging the position of a moving object, human observers do not perceive and memorize the moving object's correct position. There are two known phenomena in judged position errors of a moving object, representational momentum (RM) and the flash-lag effect (FLE), both of which we consider here. RM was originally reported by Freyd and Finke (1984). Freyd and colleagues displayed a series of still frames to imply the rotation of a rectangle (e.g., Freyd & Finke 1984, 1985; Freyd & Johnson 1987). Observers saw three views of a rectangle at different rotations about its center, with 250 msec display duration with 250 msec interstimulus interval. The fourth rectangle was presented as a probe 250 msec after the third frame presentation. The rotation of the probe was selected from possible positions symmetrically distributed around the actual third position of the rectangle. Observers were asked whether the rectangle in the third frame (the last frame of the motion sequence) was the same orientation as the probe. The results showed that their memory for the third orientation tended to be shifted in the direction of rotation. In other words, the orientation of the probe rectangle had to be rotated slightly further to be judged as being in the same position as the third rectangle. To account for the forward shift of the final position of a stimulus undergoing implied motion, some authors postulate that the dynamics of the representational system follow physical laws, such as momentum (representational momentum; Finke & Freyd 1985; Finke et al. 1986; Freyd 1987; Finke & Shyi 1988).

AB - Introduction When judging the position of a moving object, human observers do not perceive and memorize the moving object's correct position. There are two known phenomena in judged position errors of a moving object, representational momentum (RM) and the flash-lag effect (FLE), both of which we consider here. RM was originally reported by Freyd and Finke (1984). Freyd and colleagues displayed a series of still frames to imply the rotation of a rectangle (e.g., Freyd & Finke 1984, 1985; Freyd & Johnson 1987). Observers saw three views of a rectangle at different rotations about its center, with 250 msec display duration with 250 msec interstimulus interval. The fourth rectangle was presented as a probe 250 msec after the third frame presentation. The rotation of the probe was selected from possible positions symmetrically distributed around the actual third position of the rectangle. Observers were asked whether the rectangle in the third frame (the last frame of the motion sequence) was the same orientation as the probe. The results showed that their memory for the third orientation tended to be shifted in the direction of rotation. In other words, the orientation of the probe rectangle had to be rotated slightly further to be judged as being in the same position as the third rectangle. To account for the forward shift of the final position of a stimulus undergoing implied motion, some authors postulate that the dynamics of the representational system follow physical laws, such as momentum (representational momentum; Finke & Freyd 1985; Finke et al. 1986; Freyd 1987; Finke & Shyi 1988).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878922678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878922678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511750540.021

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511750540.021

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84878922678

SN - 9780511750540

SN - 9780521863186

SP - 366

EP - 378

BT - Space and Time in Perception and Action

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -