Conflict with outsiders: Disputing within and across cultural boundaries

Tom Tyler, E. Allan Lind, Ken Ichi Ohbuchi, Ikuo Sugawara, Huo Yuen J

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two studies examine how people's reactions to conflict resolution efforts by third parties are affected by whether the conflict occurs within or across cultural boundaries. Both test the social categorization hypothesis of the relational model of authority: that third-party decisions will be evaluated more strongly through judgments about the treatment of disputants (relational concerns) in conflicts within groups and more strongly in terms of decisionsfavorability (instrumental concerns) in disputes across groups. The first study tests this hypothesis in a study of conflicts between American employees and their supervisors, whereas the second does so in a study of conflicts involving Japanese and Western teachers. The results of both studies support the predictions of the relational model. In both studies, relational concerns are more important in within-group disputes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-146
Number of pages10
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume24
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1998 Feb
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dissent and Disputes
Negotiating
Conflict (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Conflict with outsiders : Disputing within and across cultural boundaries. / Tyler, Tom; Lind, E. Allan; Ohbuchi, Ken Ichi; Sugawara, Ikuo; Yuen J, Huo.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 2, 02.1998, p. 137-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tyler, Tom ; Lind, E. Allan ; Ohbuchi, Ken Ichi ; Sugawara, Ikuo ; Yuen J, Huo. / Conflict with outsiders : Disputing within and across cultural boundaries. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1998 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 137-146.
@article{231e689b39414554afac45f6bf9caef1,
title = "Conflict with outsiders: Disputing within and across cultural boundaries",
abstract = "Two studies examine how people's reactions to conflict resolution efforts by third parties are affected by whether the conflict occurs within or across cultural boundaries. Both test the social categorization hypothesis of the relational model of authority: that third-party decisions will be evaluated more strongly through judgments about the treatment of disputants (relational concerns) in conflicts within groups and more strongly in terms of decisionsfavorability (instrumental concerns) in disputes across groups. The first study tests this hypothesis in a study of conflicts between American employees and their supervisors, whereas the second does so in a study of conflicts involving Japanese and Western teachers. The results of both studies support the predictions of the relational model. In both studies, relational concerns are more important in within-group disputes.",
author = "Tom Tyler and Lind, {E. Allan} and Ohbuchi, {Ken Ichi} and Ikuo Sugawara and {Yuen J}, Huo",
year = "1998",
month = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "137--146",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conflict with outsiders

T2 - Disputing within and across cultural boundaries

AU - Tyler, Tom

AU - Lind, E. Allan

AU - Ohbuchi, Ken Ichi

AU - Sugawara, Ikuo

AU - Yuen J, Huo

PY - 1998/2

Y1 - 1998/2

N2 - Two studies examine how people's reactions to conflict resolution efforts by third parties are affected by whether the conflict occurs within or across cultural boundaries. Both test the social categorization hypothesis of the relational model of authority: that third-party decisions will be evaluated more strongly through judgments about the treatment of disputants (relational concerns) in conflicts within groups and more strongly in terms of decisionsfavorability (instrumental concerns) in disputes across groups. The first study tests this hypothesis in a study of conflicts between American employees and their supervisors, whereas the second does so in a study of conflicts involving Japanese and Western teachers. The results of both studies support the predictions of the relational model. In both studies, relational concerns are more important in within-group disputes.

AB - Two studies examine how people's reactions to conflict resolution efforts by third parties are affected by whether the conflict occurs within or across cultural boundaries. Both test the social categorization hypothesis of the relational model of authority: that third-party decisions will be evaluated more strongly through judgments about the treatment of disputants (relational concerns) in conflicts within groups and more strongly in terms of decisionsfavorability (instrumental concerns) in disputes across groups. The first study tests this hypothesis in a study of conflicts between American employees and their supervisors, whereas the second does so in a study of conflicts involving Japanese and Western teachers. The results of both studies support the predictions of the relational model. In both studies, relational concerns are more important in within-group disputes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032221111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032221111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032221111

VL - 24

SP - 137

EP - 146

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 2

ER -