Consistency analysis in multi-language knowledge sharing system

Amit Pariyar, Yohei Murakami, Donghui Lin, Toru Ishida

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Unprecedented growth in knowledge sharing among multi-language communities, both common and distinct languages, has raised the possibility of sharing inconsistent content. Though popular with traditional system, the approach to explicitly state consistency rules to avoid inconsistency is practically not suited for multi-language knowledge sharing system because of sheer complexity. Alternatively this chapter focuses on potential cause of inconsistency, cases such as content omitted, content updates not propagated and content conflicts. Ignoring such cases in knowledge sharing has undesirable consequences: community bias, global and local inconsistency and regional discrepancies. Consistency constraints from opposing knowledge sharing goals among communities is another issue. Due to which consistency policy ranges from rigid ‘one to one consistency’ to non-rigid ‘consistency where needed’. This chapter contributes with (a) process-based approach for multilingual content synchronization to leverage knowledge equally and (b) propagation-based approach to analyze community preferences when sharing specific content categories/geographic regions, to customize knowledge sharing; a value add-on to designing language services adhering to knowledge sharing goals.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCognitive Technologies
PublisherSpringer-Verlag
Pages141-156
Number of pages16
Edition9789811077920
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameCognitive Technologies
Number9789811077920
ISSN (Print)1611-2482

Fingerprint

Synchronization

Keywords

  • Content category
  • Geographic region
  • Inconsistency
  • Knowledge sharing
  • Multi-language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Pariyar, A., Murakami, Y., Lin, D., & Ishida, T. (2018). Consistency analysis in multi-language knowledge sharing system. In Cognitive Technologies (9789811077920 ed., pp. 141-156). (Cognitive Technologies; No. 9789811077920). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7793-7_9

Consistency analysis in multi-language knowledge sharing system. / Pariyar, Amit; Murakami, Yohei; Lin, Donghui; Ishida, Toru.

Cognitive Technologies. 9789811077920. ed. Springer-Verlag, 2018. p. 141-156 (Cognitive Technologies; No. 9789811077920).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Pariyar, A, Murakami, Y, Lin, D & Ishida, T 2018, Consistency analysis in multi-language knowledge sharing system. in Cognitive Technologies. 9789811077920 edn, Cognitive Technologies, no. 9789811077920, Springer-Verlag, pp. 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7793-7_9
Pariyar A, Murakami Y, Lin D, Ishida T. Consistency analysis in multi-language knowledge sharing system. In Cognitive Technologies. 9789811077920 ed. Springer-Verlag. 2018. p. 141-156. (Cognitive Technologies; 9789811077920). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7793-7_9
Pariyar, Amit ; Murakami, Yohei ; Lin, Donghui ; Ishida, Toru. / Consistency analysis in multi-language knowledge sharing system. Cognitive Technologies. 9789811077920. ed. Springer-Verlag, 2018. pp. 141-156 (Cognitive Technologies; 9789811077920).
@inbook{e9ee62d8e63a46569287b1c5617fe3ba,
title = "Consistency analysis in multi-language knowledge sharing system",
abstract = "Unprecedented growth in knowledge sharing among multi-language communities, both common and distinct languages, has raised the possibility of sharing inconsistent content. Though popular with traditional system, the approach to explicitly state consistency rules to avoid inconsistency is practically not suited for multi-language knowledge sharing system because of sheer complexity. Alternatively this chapter focuses on potential cause of inconsistency, cases such as content omitted, content updates not propagated and content conflicts. Ignoring such cases in knowledge sharing has undesirable consequences: community bias, global and local inconsistency and regional discrepancies. Consistency constraints from opposing knowledge sharing goals among communities is another issue. Due to which consistency policy ranges from rigid ‘one to one consistency’ to non-rigid ‘consistency where needed’. This chapter contributes with (a) process-based approach for multilingual content synchronization to leverage knowledge equally and (b) propagation-based approach to analyze community preferences when sharing specific content categories/geographic regions, to customize knowledge sharing; a value add-on to designing language services adhering to knowledge sharing goals.",
keywords = "Content category, Geographic region, Inconsistency, Knowledge sharing, Multi-language",
author = "Amit Pariyar and Yohei Murakami and Donghui Lin and Toru Ishida",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-981-10-7793-7_9",
language = "English",
series = "Cognitive Technologies",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag",
number = "9789811077920",
pages = "141--156",
booktitle = "Cognitive Technologies",
edition = "9789811077920",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Consistency analysis in multi-language knowledge sharing system

AU - Pariyar, Amit

AU - Murakami, Yohei

AU - Lin, Donghui

AU - Ishida, Toru

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Unprecedented growth in knowledge sharing among multi-language communities, both common and distinct languages, has raised the possibility of sharing inconsistent content. Though popular with traditional system, the approach to explicitly state consistency rules to avoid inconsistency is practically not suited for multi-language knowledge sharing system because of sheer complexity. Alternatively this chapter focuses on potential cause of inconsistency, cases such as content omitted, content updates not propagated and content conflicts. Ignoring such cases in knowledge sharing has undesirable consequences: community bias, global and local inconsistency and regional discrepancies. Consistency constraints from opposing knowledge sharing goals among communities is another issue. Due to which consistency policy ranges from rigid ‘one to one consistency’ to non-rigid ‘consistency where needed’. This chapter contributes with (a) process-based approach for multilingual content synchronization to leverage knowledge equally and (b) propagation-based approach to analyze community preferences when sharing specific content categories/geographic regions, to customize knowledge sharing; a value add-on to designing language services adhering to knowledge sharing goals.

AB - Unprecedented growth in knowledge sharing among multi-language communities, both common and distinct languages, has raised the possibility of sharing inconsistent content. Though popular with traditional system, the approach to explicitly state consistency rules to avoid inconsistency is practically not suited for multi-language knowledge sharing system because of sheer complexity. Alternatively this chapter focuses on potential cause of inconsistency, cases such as content omitted, content updates not propagated and content conflicts. Ignoring such cases in knowledge sharing has undesirable consequences: community bias, global and local inconsistency and regional discrepancies. Consistency constraints from opposing knowledge sharing goals among communities is another issue. Due to which consistency policy ranges from rigid ‘one to one consistency’ to non-rigid ‘consistency where needed’. This chapter contributes with (a) process-based approach for multilingual content synchronization to leverage knowledge equally and (b) propagation-based approach to analyze community preferences when sharing specific content categories/geographic regions, to customize knowledge sharing; a value add-on to designing language services adhering to knowledge sharing goals.

KW - Content category

KW - Geographic region

KW - Inconsistency

KW - Knowledge sharing

KW - Multi-language

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042565766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042565766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-981-10-7793-7_9

DO - 10.1007/978-981-10-7793-7_9

M3 - Chapter

T3 - Cognitive Technologies

SP - 141

EP - 156

BT - Cognitive Technologies

PB - Springer-Verlag

ER -