Constructing Co-governance between Government and Civil Society

An Institutional Approach to Collaboration

Yutaka Tsujinaka, Shakil Ahmed, Yohei Kobashi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze how civil society organizations (CSOs) collaborate with both developed and developing governments in Asia through institutional processes. It argues that in developed countries, institutional arrangements have a positive impact on collaboration. Favourable administrative governance can create collaboration between governments and CSOs. This paper reports on 3,944 studies of CSOs from 2004 to 2009 in Tokyo, Seoul, Manila, and Dhaka. CSOs in Tokyo have better combined collaborative and institutional processes than those in the other three cities. Governance in Seoul is more polarized than in the other cities, and in both Manila and Dhaka, despite there being a high degree of institutionalized relations between CSOs and the government, their collaboration is low. This research also finds that intermediary institutions between governments and CSOs play a role in co-governance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)411-426
Number of pages16
JournalPublic Organization Review
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Dec
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

civil society
governance
Government
Governance
Civil society
Civil society organizations
Tokyo

Keywords

  • Bangladesh
  • Civil society
  • Co-governance
  • Collaboration
  • Institutionalization
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Philippines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Law

Cite this

Constructing Co-governance between Government and Civil Society : An Institutional Approach to Collaboration. / Tsujinaka, Yutaka; Ahmed, Shakil; Kobashi, Yohei.

In: Public Organization Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, 12.2013, p. 411-426.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsujinaka, Yutaka ; Ahmed, Shakil ; Kobashi, Yohei. / Constructing Co-governance between Government and Civil Society : An Institutional Approach to Collaboration. In: Public Organization Review. 2013 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 411-426.
@article{4709bb22e8ec42059b4531f050db10df,
title = "Constructing Co-governance between Government and Civil Society: An Institutional Approach to Collaboration",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is to analyze how civil society organizations (CSOs) collaborate with both developed and developing governments in Asia through institutional processes. It argues that in developed countries, institutional arrangements have a positive impact on collaboration. Favourable administrative governance can create collaboration between governments and CSOs. This paper reports on 3,944 studies of CSOs from 2004 to 2009 in Tokyo, Seoul, Manila, and Dhaka. CSOs in Tokyo have better combined collaborative and institutional processes than those in the other three cities. Governance in Seoul is more polarized than in the other cities, and in both Manila and Dhaka, despite there being a high degree of institutionalized relations between CSOs and the government, their collaboration is low. This research also finds that intermediary institutions between governments and CSOs play a role in co-governance.",
keywords = "Bangladesh, Civil society, Co-governance, Collaboration, Institutionalization, Japan, Korea, Philippines",
author = "Yutaka Tsujinaka and Shakil Ahmed and Yohei Kobashi",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s11115-013-0260-9",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "411--426",
journal = "Public Organization Review",
issn = "1566-7170",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constructing Co-governance between Government and Civil Society

T2 - An Institutional Approach to Collaboration

AU - Tsujinaka, Yutaka

AU - Ahmed, Shakil

AU - Kobashi, Yohei

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - The aim of this paper is to analyze how civil society organizations (CSOs) collaborate with both developed and developing governments in Asia through institutional processes. It argues that in developed countries, institutional arrangements have a positive impact on collaboration. Favourable administrative governance can create collaboration between governments and CSOs. This paper reports on 3,944 studies of CSOs from 2004 to 2009 in Tokyo, Seoul, Manila, and Dhaka. CSOs in Tokyo have better combined collaborative and institutional processes than those in the other three cities. Governance in Seoul is more polarized than in the other cities, and in both Manila and Dhaka, despite there being a high degree of institutionalized relations between CSOs and the government, their collaboration is low. This research also finds that intermediary institutions between governments and CSOs play a role in co-governance.

AB - The aim of this paper is to analyze how civil society organizations (CSOs) collaborate with both developed and developing governments in Asia through institutional processes. It argues that in developed countries, institutional arrangements have a positive impact on collaboration. Favourable administrative governance can create collaboration between governments and CSOs. This paper reports on 3,944 studies of CSOs from 2004 to 2009 in Tokyo, Seoul, Manila, and Dhaka. CSOs in Tokyo have better combined collaborative and institutional processes than those in the other three cities. Governance in Seoul is more polarized than in the other cities, and in both Manila and Dhaka, despite there being a high degree of institutionalized relations between CSOs and the government, their collaboration is low. This research also finds that intermediary institutions between governments and CSOs play a role in co-governance.

KW - Bangladesh

KW - Civil society

KW - Co-governance

KW - Collaboration

KW - Institutionalization

KW - Japan

KW - Korea

KW - Philippines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889650202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889650202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11115-013-0260-9

DO - 10.1007/s11115-013-0260-9

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 411

EP - 426

JO - Public Organization Review

JF - Public Organization Review

SN - 1566-7170

IS - 4

ER -