Cooperative coaching: Benefits to students in extracurricular school sports

Kenryu Aoyagi, Kaori Ishii, Ai Shibata, Hirokazu Arai, Hanako Fukamachi, Koichiro Oka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Problem Statement: Many youths participate in school-based extracurricular sports activities (SBECSA). These SBECSAs contribute to positive youth development. However, SBECSAs sometimes require the outsourcing of human resources. The major reason is difficulty to manage SBECSAs by employing teachers as the primary coaching resources. Using external coaches is an effective solution for reducing the workload on teachers, and it can contribute to improving teachers’ and students’ knowledge and skills. Because teacher involvement also appears to provide benefits for students, cooperative coaching between external coaches and teachers is essential. However, the lack of evidence regarding the benefits that cooperative coaching offers students may result in inadequate cooperation. Approach: In all, 23 students who participated in SBECSAs were recruited from three junior high schools and three high schools that employed external coaches. An open-ended, semi-structured interview was conducted with each student. The KJ method was used for qualitative analysis of the responses. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine how external coaches and teachers impact students’ experiences in SBECSAs, and how external coaches and teachers differ and/or have similar impacts. Results: In terms of benefits from external coaches, six categories and 31 subcategories were identified. The major categories included the following: expert coaching; support for SBECSA teacher; general coaching; human network; improved SBECSA atmosphere; and equipment supply. Benefits from teachers comprised six categories and 22 subcategories. The major categories identified were as follows: general coaching; management and office work; participation in SBECSA; human network; connection with school life; and improved SBECSA atmosphere. Conclusions: Students perceived overlapping and specific benefits from both groups, which indicated that cooperative coaching would be more desirable to students than having only external coaches or teacher instruct their SBECSAs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number128
Pages (from-to)806-815
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Physical Education and Sport
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Sports
Students
Mentoring
Atmosphere
Office Management
Outsourced Services
Workload
Human Activities
Interviews
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • External coach
  • Extracurricular activity
  • Human resource management
  • Outsourcing
  • Qualitative study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Cooperative coaching : Benefits to students in extracurricular school sports. / Aoyagi, Kenryu; Ishii, Kaori; Shibata, Ai; Arai, Hirokazu; Fukamachi, Hanako; Oka, Koichiro.

In: Journal of Physical Education and Sport, Vol. 16, No. 3, 128, 01.09.2016, p. 806-815.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aoyagi, Kenryu ; Ishii, Kaori ; Shibata, Ai ; Arai, Hirokazu ; Fukamachi, Hanako ; Oka, Koichiro. / Cooperative coaching : Benefits to students in extracurricular school sports. In: Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2016 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 806-815.
@article{bdb51fb14b3c484792b8d5744ee47382,
title = "Cooperative coaching: Benefits to students in extracurricular school sports",
abstract = "Problem Statement: Many youths participate in school-based extracurricular sports activities (SBECSA). These SBECSAs contribute to positive youth development. However, SBECSAs sometimes require the outsourcing of human resources. The major reason is difficulty to manage SBECSAs by employing teachers as the primary coaching resources. Using external coaches is an effective solution for reducing the workload on teachers, and it can contribute to improving teachers’ and students’ knowledge and skills. Because teacher involvement also appears to provide benefits for students, cooperative coaching between external coaches and teachers is essential. However, the lack of evidence regarding the benefits that cooperative coaching offers students may result in inadequate cooperation. Approach: In all, 23 students who participated in SBECSAs were recruited from three junior high schools and three high schools that employed external coaches. An open-ended, semi-structured interview was conducted with each student. The KJ method was used for qualitative analysis of the responses. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine how external coaches and teachers impact students’ experiences in SBECSAs, and how external coaches and teachers differ and/or have similar impacts. Results: In terms of benefits from external coaches, six categories and 31 subcategories were identified. The major categories included the following: expert coaching; support for SBECSA teacher; general coaching; human network; improved SBECSA atmosphere; and equipment supply. Benefits from teachers comprised six categories and 22 subcategories. The major categories identified were as follows: general coaching; management and office work; participation in SBECSA; human network; connection with school life; and improved SBECSA atmosphere. Conclusions: Students perceived overlapping and specific benefits from both groups, which indicated that cooperative coaching would be more desirable to students than having only external coaches or teacher instruct their SBECSAs.",
keywords = "External coach, Extracurricular activity, Human resource management, Outsourcing, Qualitative study",
author = "Kenryu Aoyagi and Kaori Ishii and Ai Shibata and Hirokazu Arai and Hanako Fukamachi and Koichiro Oka",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7752/jpes.2016.03128",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "806--815",
journal = "Journal of Physical Education and Sport",
issn = "2247-8051",
publisher = "Editura Universitatea din Pitesti",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cooperative coaching

T2 - Benefits to students in extracurricular school sports

AU - Aoyagi, Kenryu

AU - Ishii, Kaori

AU - Shibata, Ai

AU - Arai, Hirokazu

AU - Fukamachi, Hanako

AU - Oka, Koichiro

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Problem Statement: Many youths participate in school-based extracurricular sports activities (SBECSA). These SBECSAs contribute to positive youth development. However, SBECSAs sometimes require the outsourcing of human resources. The major reason is difficulty to manage SBECSAs by employing teachers as the primary coaching resources. Using external coaches is an effective solution for reducing the workload on teachers, and it can contribute to improving teachers’ and students’ knowledge and skills. Because teacher involvement also appears to provide benefits for students, cooperative coaching between external coaches and teachers is essential. However, the lack of evidence regarding the benefits that cooperative coaching offers students may result in inadequate cooperation. Approach: In all, 23 students who participated in SBECSAs were recruited from three junior high schools and three high schools that employed external coaches. An open-ended, semi-structured interview was conducted with each student. The KJ method was used for qualitative analysis of the responses. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine how external coaches and teachers impact students’ experiences in SBECSAs, and how external coaches and teachers differ and/or have similar impacts. Results: In terms of benefits from external coaches, six categories and 31 subcategories were identified. The major categories included the following: expert coaching; support for SBECSA teacher; general coaching; human network; improved SBECSA atmosphere; and equipment supply. Benefits from teachers comprised six categories and 22 subcategories. The major categories identified were as follows: general coaching; management and office work; participation in SBECSA; human network; connection with school life; and improved SBECSA atmosphere. Conclusions: Students perceived overlapping and specific benefits from both groups, which indicated that cooperative coaching would be more desirable to students than having only external coaches or teacher instruct their SBECSAs.

AB - Problem Statement: Many youths participate in school-based extracurricular sports activities (SBECSA). These SBECSAs contribute to positive youth development. However, SBECSAs sometimes require the outsourcing of human resources. The major reason is difficulty to manage SBECSAs by employing teachers as the primary coaching resources. Using external coaches is an effective solution for reducing the workload on teachers, and it can contribute to improving teachers’ and students’ knowledge and skills. Because teacher involvement also appears to provide benefits for students, cooperative coaching between external coaches and teachers is essential. However, the lack of evidence regarding the benefits that cooperative coaching offers students may result in inadequate cooperation. Approach: In all, 23 students who participated in SBECSAs were recruited from three junior high schools and three high schools that employed external coaches. An open-ended, semi-structured interview was conducted with each student. The KJ method was used for qualitative analysis of the responses. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine how external coaches and teachers impact students’ experiences in SBECSAs, and how external coaches and teachers differ and/or have similar impacts. Results: In terms of benefits from external coaches, six categories and 31 subcategories were identified. The major categories included the following: expert coaching; support for SBECSA teacher; general coaching; human network; improved SBECSA atmosphere; and equipment supply. Benefits from teachers comprised six categories and 22 subcategories. The major categories identified were as follows: general coaching; management and office work; participation in SBECSA; human network; connection with school life; and improved SBECSA atmosphere. Conclusions: Students perceived overlapping and specific benefits from both groups, which indicated that cooperative coaching would be more desirable to students than having only external coaches or teacher instruct their SBECSAs.

KW - External coach

KW - Extracurricular activity

KW - Human resource management

KW - Outsourcing

KW - Qualitative study

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988923222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988923222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7752/jpes.2016.03128

DO - 10.7752/jpes.2016.03128

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84988923222

VL - 16

SP - 806

EP - 815

JO - Journal of Physical Education and Sport

JF - Journal of Physical Education and Sport

SN - 2247-8051

IS - 3

M1 - 128

ER -