Culture or Communicative Conflict? The Analysis of Equivocation in Broadcast Japanese Political Interviews

Ofer Feldman, Ken Kinoshita, Peter Bull

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The focus of this article is on equivocation in Japanese televised interviews, broadcast over a 14-month period in 2012-2013 (before and after the general election of December 16, 2012). An analysis was conducted of responses to questions by three different groups (national politicians, local politicians, and nonpoliticians). Results showed a striking level of equivocation by both national and local politicians, who together equivocated significantly more than nonpoliticians. Furthermore, national-level Diet members equivocated significantly more than local politicians, and both coalition groupings when in power were significantly more likely to equivocate than when in opposition. The results were interpreted in terms of the situational theory of communicative conflict and also in terms of cultural norms characteristic of Japanese politics and society. The failure to consider the role of such norms, it is proposed, represents an important omission in the original theory of equivocation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-89
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Language and Social Psychology
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 6
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cultural Characteristics
local politician
Politics
broadcast
Interviews
Diet
interview
grouping
politician
coalition
opposition
election
politics
Political Interview
Equivocation
Politicians
Group

Keywords

  • Japan
  • media discourse
  • political interviews
  • television
  • theory of equivocation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Culture or Communicative Conflict? The Analysis of Equivocation in Broadcast Japanese Political Interviews. / Feldman, Ofer; Kinoshita, Ken; Bull, Peter.

In: Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 1, 06.01.2015, p. 65-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b548ed08db7645659c18669c07d8159b,
title = "Culture or Communicative Conflict? The Analysis of Equivocation in Broadcast Japanese Political Interviews",
abstract = "The focus of this article is on equivocation in Japanese televised interviews, broadcast over a 14-month period in 2012-2013 (before and after the general election of December 16, 2012). An analysis was conducted of responses to questions by three different groups (national politicians, local politicians, and nonpoliticians). Results showed a striking level of equivocation by both national and local politicians, who together equivocated significantly more than nonpoliticians. Furthermore, national-level Diet members equivocated significantly more than local politicians, and both coalition groupings when in power were significantly more likely to equivocate than when in opposition. The results were interpreted in terms of the situational theory of communicative conflict and also in terms of cultural norms characteristic of Japanese politics and society. The failure to consider the role of such norms, it is proposed, represents an important omission in the original theory of equivocation.",
keywords = "Japan, media discourse, political interviews, television, theory of equivocation",
author = "Ofer Feldman and Ken Kinoshita and Peter Bull",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1177/0261927X14557567",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "65--89",
journal = "Journal of Language and Social Psychology",
issn = "0261-927X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Culture or Communicative Conflict? The Analysis of Equivocation in Broadcast Japanese Political Interviews

AU - Feldman, Ofer

AU - Kinoshita, Ken

AU - Bull, Peter

PY - 2015/1/6

Y1 - 2015/1/6

N2 - The focus of this article is on equivocation in Japanese televised interviews, broadcast over a 14-month period in 2012-2013 (before and after the general election of December 16, 2012). An analysis was conducted of responses to questions by three different groups (national politicians, local politicians, and nonpoliticians). Results showed a striking level of equivocation by both national and local politicians, who together equivocated significantly more than nonpoliticians. Furthermore, national-level Diet members equivocated significantly more than local politicians, and both coalition groupings when in power were significantly more likely to equivocate than when in opposition. The results were interpreted in terms of the situational theory of communicative conflict and also in terms of cultural norms characteristic of Japanese politics and society. The failure to consider the role of such norms, it is proposed, represents an important omission in the original theory of equivocation.

AB - The focus of this article is on equivocation in Japanese televised interviews, broadcast over a 14-month period in 2012-2013 (before and after the general election of December 16, 2012). An analysis was conducted of responses to questions by three different groups (national politicians, local politicians, and nonpoliticians). Results showed a striking level of equivocation by both national and local politicians, who together equivocated significantly more than nonpoliticians. Furthermore, national-level Diet members equivocated significantly more than local politicians, and both coalition groupings when in power were significantly more likely to equivocate than when in opposition. The results were interpreted in terms of the situational theory of communicative conflict and also in terms of cultural norms characteristic of Japanese politics and society. The failure to consider the role of such norms, it is proposed, represents an important omission in the original theory of equivocation.

KW - Japan

KW - media discourse

KW - political interviews

KW - television

KW - theory of equivocation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84914164196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84914164196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0261927X14557567

DO - 10.1177/0261927X14557567

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84914164196

VL - 34

SP - 65

EP - 89

JO - Journal of Language and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Language and Social Psychology

SN - 0261-927X

IS - 1

ER -