TY - JOUR
T1 - Cyclical behavior of firm-level volatility
T2 - An explanation for the contrast between the United States and Japan
AU - Oikawa, Koki
N1 - Funding Information:
I am grateful to Naohito Abe, Tatsuro Iwaisako, Tokuo Iwaisako, Boyan Jovanovic, Takao Kataoka, Akiomi Kitagawa, Minoru Kitahara, Romain Ranciere, Katsuya Takii, Yoshihiro Tamai, and seminar participants at JEA meeting, Osaka University, Waseda University, Tohoku University, New York University, Tokyo Metropolitan University, and Hitotsubashi University for their helpful comments. This work is supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists B (Project No. 23730183). All remaining errors are mine.
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - This study examines the cyclical behaviors of firm-level volatility, measured by real sales growth. Japanese firm-level data show that their volatility is countercyclical, whereas it is procyclical among the United States firms reported in a previous study. We formulate a theoretical model that accounts for these opposing behaviors over the business cycles. The key driving factor behind the relationship is the bankruptcy cost structure, more specifically, the relative magnitude of the fixed and marginal costs of bankruptcy. The fixed bankruptcy cost operates as an entry barrier and the marginal bankruptcy cost operates as an additional cost of hiring. These distinct impacts affect the type of firms entering/exiting the market over the business cycle. We also examine the welfare and policy implications of the model by comparing the structures of bankruptcy costs in terms of efficiency.
AB - This study examines the cyclical behaviors of firm-level volatility, measured by real sales growth. Japanese firm-level data show that their volatility is countercyclical, whereas it is procyclical among the United States firms reported in a previous study. We formulate a theoretical model that accounts for these opposing behaviors over the business cycles. The key driving factor behind the relationship is the bankruptcy cost structure, more specifically, the relative magnitude of the fixed and marginal costs of bankruptcy. The fixed bankruptcy cost operates as an entry barrier and the marginal bankruptcy cost operates as an additional cost of hiring. These distinct impacts affect the type of firms entering/exiting the market over the business cycle. We also examine the welfare and policy implications of the model by comparing the structures of bankruptcy costs in terms of efficiency.
KW - Bankruptcy cost
KW - Entrepreneur
KW - Firm-level volatility
KW - Medium-term business cycle
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888037989&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888037989&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.06.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.06.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84888037989
SN - 0164-0704
VL - 38
SP - 452
EP - 464
JO - Journal of Macroeconomics
JF - Journal of Macroeconomics
IS - PB
ER -