Cyclical behavior of firm-level volatility: An explanation for the contrast between the United States and Japan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study examines the cyclical behaviors of firm-level volatility, measured by real sales growth. Japanese firm-level data show that their volatility is countercyclical, whereas it is procyclical among the United States firms reported in a previous study. We formulate a theoretical model that accounts for these opposing behaviors over the business cycles. The key driving factor behind the relationship is the bankruptcy cost structure, more specifically, the relative magnitude of the fixed and marginal costs of bankruptcy. The fixed bankruptcy cost operates as an entry barrier and the marginal bankruptcy cost operates as an additional cost of hiring. These distinct impacts affect the type of firms entering/exiting the market over the business cycle. We also examine the welfare and policy implications of the model by comparing the structures of bankruptcy costs in terms of efficiency.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)452-464
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Macroeconomics
Volume38
Issue numberPB
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Dec

Fingerprint

Bankruptcy costs
Japan
Business cycles
Factors
Marginal cost
Fixed costs
Japanese firms
Cost structure
Bankruptcy
Sales growth
Entry barriers
Costs
Firm-level data
Hiring
Policy implications
Welfare implications

Keywords

  • Bankruptcy cost
  • Entrepreneur
  • Firm-level volatility
  • Medium-term business cycle

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Cyclical behavior of firm-level volatility : An explanation for the contrast between the United States and Japan. / Oikawa, Koki.

In: Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 38, No. PB, 12.2013, p. 452-464.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e6fe55d986ec48fbace1bb63ecff2025,
title = "Cyclical behavior of firm-level volatility: An explanation for the contrast between the United States and Japan",
abstract = "This study examines the cyclical behaviors of firm-level volatility, measured by real sales growth. Japanese firm-level data show that their volatility is countercyclical, whereas it is procyclical among the United States firms reported in a previous study. We formulate a theoretical model that accounts for these opposing behaviors over the business cycles. The key driving factor behind the relationship is the bankruptcy cost structure, more specifically, the relative magnitude of the fixed and marginal costs of bankruptcy. The fixed bankruptcy cost operates as an entry barrier and the marginal bankruptcy cost operates as an additional cost of hiring. These distinct impacts affect the type of firms entering/exiting the market over the business cycle. We also examine the welfare and policy implications of the model by comparing the structures of bankruptcy costs in terms of efficiency.",
keywords = "Bankruptcy cost, Entrepreneur, Firm-level volatility, Medium-term business cycle",
author = "Koki Oikawa",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.06.003",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "452--464",
journal = "Journal of Macroeconomics",
issn = "0164-0704",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "PB",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cyclical behavior of firm-level volatility

T2 - An explanation for the contrast between the United States and Japan

AU - Oikawa, Koki

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - This study examines the cyclical behaviors of firm-level volatility, measured by real sales growth. Japanese firm-level data show that their volatility is countercyclical, whereas it is procyclical among the United States firms reported in a previous study. We formulate a theoretical model that accounts for these opposing behaviors over the business cycles. The key driving factor behind the relationship is the bankruptcy cost structure, more specifically, the relative magnitude of the fixed and marginal costs of bankruptcy. The fixed bankruptcy cost operates as an entry barrier and the marginal bankruptcy cost operates as an additional cost of hiring. These distinct impacts affect the type of firms entering/exiting the market over the business cycle. We also examine the welfare and policy implications of the model by comparing the structures of bankruptcy costs in terms of efficiency.

AB - This study examines the cyclical behaviors of firm-level volatility, measured by real sales growth. Japanese firm-level data show that their volatility is countercyclical, whereas it is procyclical among the United States firms reported in a previous study. We formulate a theoretical model that accounts for these opposing behaviors over the business cycles. The key driving factor behind the relationship is the bankruptcy cost structure, more specifically, the relative magnitude of the fixed and marginal costs of bankruptcy. The fixed bankruptcy cost operates as an entry barrier and the marginal bankruptcy cost operates as an additional cost of hiring. These distinct impacts affect the type of firms entering/exiting the market over the business cycle. We also examine the welfare and policy implications of the model by comparing the structures of bankruptcy costs in terms of efficiency.

KW - Bankruptcy cost

KW - Entrepreneur

KW - Firm-level volatility

KW - Medium-term business cycle

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888037989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888037989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.06.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.06.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84888037989

VL - 38

SP - 452

EP - 464

JO - Journal of Macroeconomics

JF - Journal of Macroeconomics

SN - 0164-0704

IS - PB

ER -