Defending scientific study of the social: Against Clifford Geertz (and his critics)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper will defend scientific study of the social by scrutinizing Clifford Geertz's interpretive anthropology, and evolutionary psychologists' criticism of it. I shall critically examine Geertz's identification of anthropology with literary criticism, his assumption that a science of society is possible only on a positivist model, his view of the relation between culture and mind, and his anti anti-relativism. Then I shall discuss evolutionary psychologists' criticism of Geertz's view as an exemplar of the so-called "Standard Social Science Model." Finally, I shall claim that both Geertz and evolutionary psychologists misunderstand the aim of the social sciences, which is to explain the unintended consequences of human actions in institutional contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-314
Number of pages26
JournalPhilosophy of the Social Sciences
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Sep
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

psychologist
critic
anthropology
science of society
criticism
social science
literary criticism
relativism
Clifford Geertz
Evolutionary
Psychologists
Anthropology
Criticism

Keywords

  • Clifford Geertz
  • Evolutionary psychology
  • Interpretive anthropology
  • Positivism
  • Standard Social Science Model (SSSM)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Defending scientific study of the social : Against Clifford Geertz (and his critics). / Yoshida, Kei.

In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 3, 09.2007, p. 289-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{662d5132d7d8489b8c88f488d127e2e1,
title = "Defending scientific study of the social: Against Clifford Geertz (and his critics)",
abstract = "This paper will defend scientific study of the social by scrutinizing Clifford Geertz's interpretive anthropology, and evolutionary psychologists' criticism of it. I shall critically examine Geertz's identification of anthropology with literary criticism, his assumption that a science of society is possible only on a positivist model, his view of the relation between culture and mind, and his anti anti-relativism. Then I shall discuss evolutionary psychologists' criticism of Geertz's view as an exemplar of the so-called {"}Standard Social Science Model.{"} Finally, I shall claim that both Geertz and evolutionary psychologists misunderstand the aim of the social sciences, which is to explain the unintended consequences of human actions in institutional contexts.",
keywords = "Clifford Geertz, Evolutionary psychology, Interpretive anthropology, Positivism, Standard Social Science Model (SSSM)",
author = "Kei Yoshida",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1177/0048393107303776",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "289--314",
journal = "Philosophy of the Social Sciences",
issn = "0048-3931",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defending scientific study of the social

T2 - Against Clifford Geertz (and his critics)

AU - Yoshida, Kei

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - This paper will defend scientific study of the social by scrutinizing Clifford Geertz's interpretive anthropology, and evolutionary psychologists' criticism of it. I shall critically examine Geertz's identification of anthropology with literary criticism, his assumption that a science of society is possible only on a positivist model, his view of the relation between culture and mind, and his anti anti-relativism. Then I shall discuss evolutionary psychologists' criticism of Geertz's view as an exemplar of the so-called "Standard Social Science Model." Finally, I shall claim that both Geertz and evolutionary psychologists misunderstand the aim of the social sciences, which is to explain the unintended consequences of human actions in institutional contexts.

AB - This paper will defend scientific study of the social by scrutinizing Clifford Geertz's interpretive anthropology, and evolutionary psychologists' criticism of it. I shall critically examine Geertz's identification of anthropology with literary criticism, his assumption that a science of society is possible only on a positivist model, his view of the relation between culture and mind, and his anti anti-relativism. Then I shall discuss evolutionary psychologists' criticism of Geertz's view as an exemplar of the so-called "Standard Social Science Model." Finally, I shall claim that both Geertz and evolutionary psychologists misunderstand the aim of the social sciences, which is to explain the unintended consequences of human actions in institutional contexts.

KW - Clifford Geertz

KW - Evolutionary psychology

KW - Interpretive anthropology

KW - Positivism

KW - Standard Social Science Model (SSSM)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547839769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547839769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0048393107303776

DO - 10.1177/0048393107303776

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34547839769

VL - 37

SP - 289

EP - 314

JO - Philosophy of the Social Sciences

JF - Philosophy of the Social Sciences

SN - 0048-3931

IS - 3

ER -