Degradation predictions of lithium iron phosphate battery

Yuya Hato, Hung Chen Chien, Toshio Hirota, Yushi Kamiya, Yasuhiro Daisho, Shoichi Inami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Degradation mechanisms of lithium iron phosphate battery have been analyzed with calendar tests and cycle tests. To quantify capacity loss with the life prediction equation, it is seen from the aspect of separating the total capacity loss into calendar capacity and real cycle capacity loss. The real cycle capacity loss of total capacity loss was derived by subtracting the calendar capacity loss parts during cycle tests. It is considered that calendar capacity loss is dominated by SEI formation. On the other hand, real cycle capacity loss includes structure disorder of electrodes and promotion of SEI growth such as delamination and regrowth. Generally, the test results indicated that capacity loss increases under high temperature and SOC condition, and SOC range (ΔSOC) is not related to the loss. However, we founded that the test results under 5°C condition do not exactly show the same tendency of degradation. As a result, the life prediction equation is based on the chemical kinetics and it can only be adopted only beyond the 15°C temperature limitation. At this time in life prediction equation, to take ΔSOC into consideration and describe the real cycle capacity loss specifically with amounts of lithium-ion intercalation/deintercalation, the processing amount of current is adopted as the standard of capacity degradation instead of the cycle number. Finally, it is considered to be possible that certain reactions such as further structure disorder or lithium plating caused under low temperature. However, we also founded that DC internal resistance tests results indicated that only calendar capacity loss can apply to chemical kinetics. It is necessary to consider the other construction method of the life prediction equation in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-31
Number of pages7
JournalWorld Electric Vehicle Journal
Volume7
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Phosphates
Lithium
Iron
Degradation
Reaction kinetics
Intercalation
Plating
Delamination
Temperature
Electrodes
Ions
Processing

Keywords

  • BEV (Battery Electric Vehicle)
  • Degradation prediction
  • Durability
  • Lithium iron phosphate battery
  • Lithium-ion battery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Automotive Engineering

Cite this

Hato, Y., Chien, H. C., Hirota, T., Kamiya, Y., Daisho, Y., & Inami, S. (2015). Degradation predictions of lithium iron phosphate battery. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 7(1), 25-31.

Degradation predictions of lithium iron phosphate battery. / Hato, Yuya; Chien, Hung Chen; Hirota, Toshio; Kamiya, Yushi; Daisho, Yasuhiro; Inami, Shoichi.

In: World Electric Vehicle Journal, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 25-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hato, Y, Chien, HC, Hirota, T, Kamiya, Y, Daisho, Y & Inami, S 2015, 'Degradation predictions of lithium iron phosphate battery', World Electric Vehicle Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 25-31.
Hato Y, Chien HC, Hirota T, Kamiya Y, Daisho Y, Inami S. Degradation predictions of lithium iron phosphate battery. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2015 Jan 1;7(1):25-31.
Hato, Yuya ; Chien, Hung Chen ; Hirota, Toshio ; Kamiya, Yushi ; Daisho, Yasuhiro ; Inami, Shoichi. / Degradation predictions of lithium iron phosphate battery. In: World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 25-31.
@article{7493b01586c64585af9114eaef20b92a,
title = "Degradation predictions of lithium iron phosphate battery",
abstract = "Degradation mechanisms of lithium iron phosphate battery have been analyzed with calendar tests and cycle tests. To quantify capacity loss with the life prediction equation, it is seen from the aspect of separating the total capacity loss into calendar capacity and real cycle capacity loss. The real cycle capacity loss of total capacity loss was derived by subtracting the calendar capacity loss parts during cycle tests. It is considered that calendar capacity loss is dominated by SEI formation. On the other hand, real cycle capacity loss includes structure disorder of electrodes and promotion of SEI growth such as delamination and regrowth. Generally, the test results indicated that capacity loss increases under high temperature and SOC condition, and SOC range (ΔSOC) is not related to the loss. However, we founded that the test results under 5°C condition do not exactly show the same tendency of degradation. As a result, the life prediction equation is based on the chemical kinetics and it can only be adopted only beyond the 15°C temperature limitation. At this time in life prediction equation, to take ΔSOC into consideration and describe the real cycle capacity loss specifically with amounts of lithium-ion intercalation/deintercalation, the processing amount of current is adopted as the standard of capacity degradation instead of the cycle number. Finally, it is considered to be possible that certain reactions such as further structure disorder or lithium plating caused under low temperature. However, we also founded that DC internal resistance tests results indicated that only calendar capacity loss can apply to chemical kinetics. It is necessary to consider the other construction method of the life prediction equation in the future.",
keywords = "BEV (Battery Electric Vehicle), Degradation prediction, Durability, Lithium iron phosphate battery, Lithium-ion battery",
author = "Yuya Hato and Chien, {Hung Chen} and Toshio Hirota and Yushi Kamiya and Yasuhiro Daisho and Shoichi Inami",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "25--31",
journal = "World Electric Vehicle Journal",
issn = "2032-6653",
publisher = "The World Electric Vehicle Association (WEVA)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Degradation predictions of lithium iron phosphate battery

AU - Hato, Yuya

AU - Chien, Hung Chen

AU - Hirota, Toshio

AU - Kamiya, Yushi

AU - Daisho, Yasuhiro

AU - Inami, Shoichi

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Degradation mechanisms of lithium iron phosphate battery have been analyzed with calendar tests and cycle tests. To quantify capacity loss with the life prediction equation, it is seen from the aspect of separating the total capacity loss into calendar capacity and real cycle capacity loss. The real cycle capacity loss of total capacity loss was derived by subtracting the calendar capacity loss parts during cycle tests. It is considered that calendar capacity loss is dominated by SEI formation. On the other hand, real cycle capacity loss includes structure disorder of electrodes and promotion of SEI growth such as delamination and regrowth. Generally, the test results indicated that capacity loss increases under high temperature and SOC condition, and SOC range (ΔSOC) is not related to the loss. However, we founded that the test results under 5°C condition do not exactly show the same tendency of degradation. As a result, the life prediction equation is based on the chemical kinetics and it can only be adopted only beyond the 15°C temperature limitation. At this time in life prediction equation, to take ΔSOC into consideration and describe the real cycle capacity loss specifically with amounts of lithium-ion intercalation/deintercalation, the processing amount of current is adopted as the standard of capacity degradation instead of the cycle number. Finally, it is considered to be possible that certain reactions such as further structure disorder or lithium plating caused under low temperature. However, we also founded that DC internal resistance tests results indicated that only calendar capacity loss can apply to chemical kinetics. It is necessary to consider the other construction method of the life prediction equation in the future.

AB - Degradation mechanisms of lithium iron phosphate battery have been analyzed with calendar tests and cycle tests. To quantify capacity loss with the life prediction equation, it is seen from the aspect of separating the total capacity loss into calendar capacity and real cycle capacity loss. The real cycle capacity loss of total capacity loss was derived by subtracting the calendar capacity loss parts during cycle tests. It is considered that calendar capacity loss is dominated by SEI formation. On the other hand, real cycle capacity loss includes structure disorder of electrodes and promotion of SEI growth such as delamination and regrowth. Generally, the test results indicated that capacity loss increases under high temperature and SOC condition, and SOC range (ΔSOC) is not related to the loss. However, we founded that the test results under 5°C condition do not exactly show the same tendency of degradation. As a result, the life prediction equation is based on the chemical kinetics and it can only be adopted only beyond the 15°C temperature limitation. At this time in life prediction equation, to take ΔSOC into consideration and describe the real cycle capacity loss specifically with amounts of lithium-ion intercalation/deintercalation, the processing amount of current is adopted as the standard of capacity degradation instead of the cycle number. Finally, it is considered to be possible that certain reactions such as further structure disorder or lithium plating caused under low temperature. However, we also founded that DC internal resistance tests results indicated that only calendar capacity loss can apply to chemical kinetics. It is necessary to consider the other construction method of the life prediction equation in the future.

KW - BEV (Battery Electric Vehicle)

KW - Degradation prediction

KW - Durability

KW - Lithium iron phosphate battery

KW - Lithium-ion battery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042368130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042368130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042368130

VL - 7

SP - 25

EP - 31

JO - World Electric Vehicle Journal

JF - World Electric Vehicle Journal

SN - 2032-6653

IS - 1

ER -