"Democracy as civilisation"

Christopher Edward Hobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, democracy has come to embody the very idea of legitimate statehood in international politics. It has done so largely through defining a new standard of civilisation, in which "democraticness" determines the limits of international society and helps to construct relations with non-democracies "beyond the pale". Like the "classical" standard, this new version again reflects a considerable interest in the socio-political organisation of states. Central in this shift back to a more "anti-pluralist" international society has been the democratic peace thesis, which emphasises how the internal (democratic) characteristics of states influence their external behaviour. Against more optimistic interpretations, it is argued that the democratic peace is a distinctly Janus-faced creature: promoting peace between democracies, while potentially encouraging war against non-democratic others. Within the democratic peace, non-democracies become not just behaviourally threatening but also ontologically threatening. Non-democracies are a danger because of what they are (or are not). In sum, the argument presented is that democracy, positioned as the most legitimate form of domestic governance in international society, has become caught up and used in global structures of domination, hierarchy and violence. Thus, the role of "democracy" in international politics is much more complicated, and, at least in its current guise, less progressive than often portrayed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-95
Number of pages21
JournalGlobal Society
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jan
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Global and Planetary Change

Cite this