Democratic Peace: Progress and Crisis

Christopher Edward Hobson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    When work on the democratic peace first emerged it contributed to the revitalization of liberal thought and represented an important contribution to International Relations (IR). Yet innovation has been replaced by stagnation. Coding and correlation are debated ad infinitum, while little attention is given to growing economic inequality, voter alienation, a decline in traditional parties, rising populism and a wide array of related trends that raise serious doubts about the health of democracies at the center of the zone of peace. Yet if democratic institutions are not functioning as they are meant to, and norms of compromise are disappearing domestically, what hope can there be that these will facilitate cooperative behavior between democracies? Rather than promoting peace, could it be that capitalism in its contemporary neoliberal form is undermining or hollowing out democracy? The static understanding of democracy adopted by this research means that such questions have been largely overlooked. In response, I focus on two major changes impacting established democracies and consider their significance for democratic peace arguments: The decline of democratic institutions and culture, as well as how neoliberalism is reshaping the relationship between democracy and capitalism. In developing this argument, I propose that the template that the democratic peace research program offers for studying the world is emblematic of-and contributing to-a troubling contracting of our political vision. An excessive concern with methodological rigor, combined with a narrow understanding of what qualifies as valid research, has resulted in a body of scholarship that is remarkably sophisticated but has surprisingly little to say about democracy and its place in the world.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)697-710
    Number of pages14
    JournalPerspectives on Politics
    Volume15
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017 Sep 1

    Fingerprint

    peace
    democracy
    capitalist society
    peace research
    cooperative behavior
    populism
    stagnation
    alienation
    neoliberalism
    international relations
    compromise
    coding
    voter
    innovation
    trend
    health
    economics

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Political Science and International Relations

    Cite this

    Democratic Peace : Progress and Crisis. / Hobson, Christopher Edward.

    In: Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 15, No. 3, 01.09.2017, p. 697-710.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Hobson, Christopher Edward. / Democratic Peace : Progress and Crisis. In: Perspectives on Politics. 2017 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 697-710.
    @article{d153215e8e8d4fe5b5effe546a5da8e8,
    title = "Democratic Peace: Progress and Crisis",
    abstract = "When work on the democratic peace first emerged it contributed to the revitalization of liberal thought and represented an important contribution to International Relations (IR). Yet innovation has been replaced by stagnation. Coding and correlation are debated ad infinitum, while little attention is given to growing economic inequality, voter alienation, a decline in traditional parties, rising populism and a wide array of related trends that raise serious doubts about the health of democracies at the center of the zone of peace. Yet if democratic institutions are not functioning as they are meant to, and norms of compromise are disappearing domestically, what hope can there be that these will facilitate cooperative behavior between democracies? Rather than promoting peace, could it be that capitalism in its contemporary neoliberal form is undermining or hollowing out democracy? The static understanding of democracy adopted by this research means that such questions have been largely overlooked. In response, I focus on two major changes impacting established democracies and consider their significance for democratic peace arguments: The decline of democratic institutions and culture, as well as how neoliberalism is reshaping the relationship between democracy and capitalism. In developing this argument, I propose that the template that the democratic peace research program offers for studying the world is emblematic of-and contributing to-a troubling contracting of our political vision. An excessive concern with methodological rigor, combined with a narrow understanding of what qualifies as valid research, has resulted in a body of scholarship that is remarkably sophisticated but has surprisingly little to say about democracy and its place in the world.",
    author = "Hobson, {Christopher Edward}",
    year = "2017",
    month = "9",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1017/S1537592717000913",
    language = "English",
    volume = "15",
    pages = "697--710",
    journal = "Perspectives on Politics",
    issn = "1537-5927",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Democratic Peace

    T2 - Progress and Crisis

    AU - Hobson, Christopher Edward

    PY - 2017/9/1

    Y1 - 2017/9/1

    N2 - When work on the democratic peace first emerged it contributed to the revitalization of liberal thought and represented an important contribution to International Relations (IR). Yet innovation has been replaced by stagnation. Coding and correlation are debated ad infinitum, while little attention is given to growing economic inequality, voter alienation, a decline in traditional parties, rising populism and a wide array of related trends that raise serious doubts about the health of democracies at the center of the zone of peace. Yet if democratic institutions are not functioning as they are meant to, and norms of compromise are disappearing domestically, what hope can there be that these will facilitate cooperative behavior between democracies? Rather than promoting peace, could it be that capitalism in its contemporary neoliberal form is undermining or hollowing out democracy? The static understanding of democracy adopted by this research means that such questions have been largely overlooked. In response, I focus on two major changes impacting established democracies and consider their significance for democratic peace arguments: The decline of democratic institutions and culture, as well as how neoliberalism is reshaping the relationship between democracy and capitalism. In developing this argument, I propose that the template that the democratic peace research program offers for studying the world is emblematic of-and contributing to-a troubling contracting of our political vision. An excessive concern with methodological rigor, combined with a narrow understanding of what qualifies as valid research, has resulted in a body of scholarship that is remarkably sophisticated but has surprisingly little to say about democracy and its place in the world.

    AB - When work on the democratic peace first emerged it contributed to the revitalization of liberal thought and represented an important contribution to International Relations (IR). Yet innovation has been replaced by stagnation. Coding and correlation are debated ad infinitum, while little attention is given to growing economic inequality, voter alienation, a decline in traditional parties, rising populism and a wide array of related trends that raise serious doubts about the health of democracies at the center of the zone of peace. Yet if democratic institutions are not functioning as they are meant to, and norms of compromise are disappearing domestically, what hope can there be that these will facilitate cooperative behavior between democracies? Rather than promoting peace, could it be that capitalism in its contemporary neoliberal form is undermining or hollowing out democracy? The static understanding of democracy adopted by this research means that such questions have been largely overlooked. In response, I focus on two major changes impacting established democracies and consider their significance for democratic peace arguments: The decline of democratic institutions and culture, as well as how neoliberalism is reshaping the relationship between democracy and capitalism. In developing this argument, I propose that the template that the democratic peace research program offers for studying the world is emblematic of-and contributing to-a troubling contracting of our political vision. An excessive concern with methodological rigor, combined with a narrow understanding of what qualifies as valid research, has resulted in a body of scholarship that is remarkably sophisticated but has surprisingly little to say about democracy and its place in the world.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028317722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028317722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/S1537592717000913

    DO - 10.1017/S1537592717000913

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85028317722

    VL - 15

    SP - 697

    EP - 710

    JO - Perspectives on Politics

    JF - Perspectives on Politics

    SN - 1537-5927

    IS - 3

    ER -