Development of program coupling flow simulator with geomechanics simulator using adaptive mesh refinement model and analytical solution for simple one-dimensional rock deformation

Masaru Sawata, Shigeki Iwata, Norio Tenma, Masanori Kurihara

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

    Abstract

    In general, conventional oil and gas reservoirs are not deformed significantly. However, some unconventional reservoirs including those of methane hydrate and heavy oil/bitumen are soft and deformable. Therefore, it is important to introduce the geomechanical effects such as the changes in porosity/permeability associated with the deformation of a reservoir for accurately predicting production performances for these unconventional reservoirs. Recently, the reservoir fluid flow behavior has been simulated in conjunction with geomechanics simulation, using various coupling methods such as fully implicit method, explicit method, iterative method, etc. All of these methods have both advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fully implicit method, which solves flow and geomechanical behavior simultaneously, is accurate, but requires a huge computer time. In addition, it is difficult to utilize existing flow simulators and geomechanics simulators in this method. Meanwhile, the explicit method does not require much computational time, but is not accurate since the geomechanical behavior is predicted without being reflected enough in flow simulation. The iterative method is accurate because geomechanical information and flow information is transferred to each other until the flow performances become consistent with geomechanical behavior. This method, however, requires considerable computer time. Therefore, we conducted this research seeking for a new method coupling fluid flow with geomechanics that enables the accurate prediction in a reasonably short computer time. In this research, after developing the 3-D (dimensional), 3-phase black oil type simulator and the elastic type geomechanics simulator, the programs combining these two simulators by various methods were developed. To shorten the computational time, the geomechanics simulator developed in this research has the function of computing stress-strain field using Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) model. In addition, the program that roughly calculates the formation deformation applying the analytical solution for simple 1-D deformation was coded. Furthermore, the flow simulator solving one-dimensional deformation equation implicitly with flow equations was constructed. Case studies using these simulators/programs revealed that: i) the solutions given by the explicit method were unreliable, ii) the application of the analytical solution of 1-D deformation was very fast, but might not be accurate in the complex 3-D case, iii) the iterative method could provide accurate solutions, but was slow, and iv) the best method was to couple the flow simulator with the geomechanics simulator equipped with AMR model, which could reduce the computational time to less than a half of the conventional iterative methods without reducing the accuracy of prediction.

    Original languageEnglish
    Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1
    Event24th Formation Evaluation Symposium of Japan - Chiba, Japan
    Duration: 2018 Oct 112018 Oct 12

    Other

    Other24th Formation Evaluation Symposium of Japan
    CountryJapan
    CityChiba
    Period18/10/1118/10/12

    Fingerprint

    Geomechanics
    geomechanics
    simulator
    Simulators
    Rocks
    rock
    Iterative methods
    asphalt
    Flow of fluids
    Oils
    method
    programme
    Petroleum reservoirs
    Methane
    fluid flow
    Flow simulation
    Hydrates
    Crude oil
    Porosity
    Gases

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economic Geology
    • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
    • Geochemistry and Petrology
    • Geology
    • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

    Cite this

    Development of program coupling flow simulator with geomechanics simulator using adaptive mesh refinement model and analytical solution for simple one-dimensional rock deformation. / Sawata, Masaru; Iwata, Shigeki; Tenma, Norio; Kurihara, Masanori.

    2018. Paper presented at 24th Formation Evaluation Symposium of Japan, Chiba, Japan.

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

    Sawata, M, Iwata, S, Tenma, N & Kurihara, M 2018, 'Development of program coupling flow simulator with geomechanics simulator using adaptive mesh refinement model and analytical solution for simple one-dimensional rock deformation', Paper presented at 24th Formation Evaluation Symposium of Japan, Chiba, Japan, 18/10/11 - 18/10/12.
    @conference{362225ab836d421ba28fd3ab44905ef6,
    title = "Development of program coupling flow simulator with geomechanics simulator using adaptive mesh refinement model and analytical solution for simple one-dimensional rock deformation",
    abstract = "In general, conventional oil and gas reservoirs are not deformed significantly. However, some unconventional reservoirs including those of methane hydrate and heavy oil/bitumen are soft and deformable. Therefore, it is important to introduce the geomechanical effects such as the changes in porosity/permeability associated with the deformation of a reservoir for accurately predicting production performances for these unconventional reservoirs. Recently, the reservoir fluid flow behavior has been simulated in conjunction with geomechanics simulation, using various coupling methods such as fully implicit method, explicit method, iterative method, etc. All of these methods have both advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fully implicit method, which solves flow and geomechanical behavior simultaneously, is accurate, but requires a huge computer time. In addition, it is difficult to utilize existing flow simulators and geomechanics simulators in this method. Meanwhile, the explicit method does not require much computational time, but is not accurate since the geomechanical behavior is predicted without being reflected enough in flow simulation. The iterative method is accurate because geomechanical information and flow information is transferred to each other until the flow performances become consistent with geomechanical behavior. This method, however, requires considerable computer time. Therefore, we conducted this research seeking for a new method coupling fluid flow with geomechanics that enables the accurate prediction in a reasonably short computer time. In this research, after developing the 3-D (dimensional), 3-phase black oil type simulator and the elastic type geomechanics simulator, the programs combining these two simulators by various methods were developed. To shorten the computational time, the geomechanics simulator developed in this research has the function of computing stress-strain field using Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) model. In addition, the program that roughly calculates the formation deformation applying the analytical solution for simple 1-D deformation was coded. Furthermore, the flow simulator solving one-dimensional deformation equation implicitly with flow equations was constructed. Case studies using these simulators/programs revealed that: i) the solutions given by the explicit method were unreliable, ii) the application of the analytical solution of 1-D deformation was very fast, but might not be accurate in the complex 3-D case, iii) the iterative method could provide accurate solutions, but was slow, and iv) the best method was to couple the flow simulator with the geomechanics simulator equipped with AMR model, which could reduce the computational time to less than a half of the conventional iterative methods without reducing the accuracy of prediction.",
    author = "Masaru Sawata and Shigeki Iwata and Norio Tenma and Masanori Kurihara",
    year = "2018",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    language = "English",
    note = "24th Formation Evaluation Symposium of Japan ; Conference date: 11-10-2018 Through 12-10-2018",

    }

    TY - CONF

    T1 - Development of program coupling flow simulator with geomechanics simulator using adaptive mesh refinement model and analytical solution for simple one-dimensional rock deformation

    AU - Sawata, Masaru

    AU - Iwata, Shigeki

    AU - Tenma, Norio

    AU - Kurihara, Masanori

    PY - 2018/1/1

    Y1 - 2018/1/1

    N2 - In general, conventional oil and gas reservoirs are not deformed significantly. However, some unconventional reservoirs including those of methane hydrate and heavy oil/bitumen are soft and deformable. Therefore, it is important to introduce the geomechanical effects such as the changes in porosity/permeability associated with the deformation of a reservoir for accurately predicting production performances for these unconventional reservoirs. Recently, the reservoir fluid flow behavior has been simulated in conjunction with geomechanics simulation, using various coupling methods such as fully implicit method, explicit method, iterative method, etc. All of these methods have both advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fully implicit method, which solves flow and geomechanical behavior simultaneously, is accurate, but requires a huge computer time. In addition, it is difficult to utilize existing flow simulators and geomechanics simulators in this method. Meanwhile, the explicit method does not require much computational time, but is not accurate since the geomechanical behavior is predicted without being reflected enough in flow simulation. The iterative method is accurate because geomechanical information and flow information is transferred to each other until the flow performances become consistent with geomechanical behavior. This method, however, requires considerable computer time. Therefore, we conducted this research seeking for a new method coupling fluid flow with geomechanics that enables the accurate prediction in a reasonably short computer time. In this research, after developing the 3-D (dimensional), 3-phase black oil type simulator and the elastic type geomechanics simulator, the programs combining these two simulators by various methods were developed. To shorten the computational time, the geomechanics simulator developed in this research has the function of computing stress-strain field using Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) model. In addition, the program that roughly calculates the formation deformation applying the analytical solution for simple 1-D deformation was coded. Furthermore, the flow simulator solving one-dimensional deformation equation implicitly with flow equations was constructed. Case studies using these simulators/programs revealed that: i) the solutions given by the explicit method were unreliable, ii) the application of the analytical solution of 1-D deformation was very fast, but might not be accurate in the complex 3-D case, iii) the iterative method could provide accurate solutions, but was slow, and iv) the best method was to couple the flow simulator with the geomechanics simulator equipped with AMR model, which could reduce the computational time to less than a half of the conventional iterative methods without reducing the accuracy of prediction.

    AB - In general, conventional oil and gas reservoirs are not deformed significantly. However, some unconventional reservoirs including those of methane hydrate and heavy oil/bitumen are soft and deformable. Therefore, it is important to introduce the geomechanical effects such as the changes in porosity/permeability associated with the deformation of a reservoir for accurately predicting production performances for these unconventional reservoirs. Recently, the reservoir fluid flow behavior has been simulated in conjunction with geomechanics simulation, using various coupling methods such as fully implicit method, explicit method, iterative method, etc. All of these methods have both advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fully implicit method, which solves flow and geomechanical behavior simultaneously, is accurate, but requires a huge computer time. In addition, it is difficult to utilize existing flow simulators and geomechanics simulators in this method. Meanwhile, the explicit method does not require much computational time, but is not accurate since the geomechanical behavior is predicted without being reflected enough in flow simulation. The iterative method is accurate because geomechanical information and flow information is transferred to each other until the flow performances become consistent with geomechanical behavior. This method, however, requires considerable computer time. Therefore, we conducted this research seeking for a new method coupling fluid flow with geomechanics that enables the accurate prediction in a reasonably short computer time. In this research, after developing the 3-D (dimensional), 3-phase black oil type simulator and the elastic type geomechanics simulator, the programs combining these two simulators by various methods were developed. To shorten the computational time, the geomechanics simulator developed in this research has the function of computing stress-strain field using Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) model. In addition, the program that roughly calculates the formation deformation applying the analytical solution for simple 1-D deformation was coded. Furthermore, the flow simulator solving one-dimensional deformation equation implicitly with flow equations was constructed. Case studies using these simulators/programs revealed that: i) the solutions given by the explicit method were unreliable, ii) the application of the analytical solution of 1-D deformation was very fast, but might not be accurate in the complex 3-D case, iii) the iterative method could provide accurate solutions, but was slow, and iv) the best method was to couple the flow simulator with the geomechanics simulator equipped with AMR model, which could reduce the computational time to less than a half of the conventional iterative methods without reducing the accuracy of prediction.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059416821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059416821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Paper

    AN - SCOPUS:85059416821

    ER -