Difference in surface degradation due to partial discharges between polyamide nanocomposite and microcomposite

Masahiro Kozako, Ryoichi Kido, Norikazu Fuse, Yoshimichi Ohki, Tatsuki Okamoto, Toshikatsu Tanaka

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    58 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Partial discharge (PD) degradation was investigated to compare polyamide nanocomposites with two kinds of polyamide microcomposites. Such materials were exposed to PDs under the IEC(b) electrode configuration for evaluation of PD resistance. Comparisons were made as to the surface roughness using a scanning electron microscope, an atomic force microscope, and a mechanical surface profilometer. It is concluded that polyamide nanocomposite is more resistant to PDs than microcomposites, and that nanoeffects would work against PD degradation, which include filler-matrix bonding, inter-filler space, morphology, and mesoscopic interaction.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationAnnual Report - Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, CEIDP
    Pages398-401
    Number of pages4
    Publication statusPublished - 2004
    Event2004 Annual Report - Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, CEIDP - Boulder, CO, United States
    Duration: 2004 Oct 172004 Oct 20

    Other

    Other2004 Annual Report - Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, CEIDP
    CountryUnited States
    CityBoulder, CO
    Period04/10/1704/10/20

    Fingerprint

    Partial discharges
    Polyamides
    Nanocomposites
    Degradation
    Fillers
    Microscopes
    Electron microscopes
    Surface roughness
    Scanning
    Electrodes

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Engineering(all)

    Cite this

    Kozako, M., Kido, R., Fuse, N., Ohki, Y., Okamoto, T., & Tanaka, T. (2004). Difference in surface degradation due to partial discharges between polyamide nanocomposite and microcomposite. In Annual Report - Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, CEIDP (pp. 398-401)

    Difference in surface degradation due to partial discharges between polyamide nanocomposite and microcomposite. / Kozako, Masahiro; Kido, Ryoichi; Fuse, Norikazu; Ohki, Yoshimichi; Okamoto, Tatsuki; Tanaka, Toshikatsu.

    Annual Report - Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, CEIDP. 2004. p. 398-401.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    Kozako, M, Kido, R, Fuse, N, Ohki, Y, Okamoto, T & Tanaka, T 2004, Difference in surface degradation due to partial discharges between polyamide nanocomposite and microcomposite. in Annual Report - Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, CEIDP. pp. 398-401, 2004 Annual Report - Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, CEIDP, Boulder, CO, United States, 04/10/17.
    Kozako M, Kido R, Fuse N, Ohki Y, Okamoto T, Tanaka T. Difference in surface degradation due to partial discharges between polyamide nanocomposite and microcomposite. In Annual Report - Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, CEIDP. 2004. p. 398-401
    Kozako, Masahiro ; Kido, Ryoichi ; Fuse, Norikazu ; Ohki, Yoshimichi ; Okamoto, Tatsuki ; Tanaka, Toshikatsu. / Difference in surface degradation due to partial discharges between polyamide nanocomposite and microcomposite. Annual Report - Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, CEIDP. 2004. pp. 398-401
    @inproceedings{ba45037846554dd0973ee9d3557f5a5e,
    title = "Difference in surface degradation due to partial discharges between polyamide nanocomposite and microcomposite",
    abstract = "Partial discharge (PD) degradation was investigated to compare polyamide nanocomposites with two kinds of polyamide microcomposites. Such materials were exposed to PDs under the IEC(b) electrode configuration for evaluation of PD resistance. Comparisons were made as to the surface roughness using a scanning electron microscope, an atomic force microscope, and a mechanical surface profilometer. It is concluded that polyamide nanocomposite is more resistant to PDs than microcomposites, and that nanoeffects would work against PD degradation, which include filler-matrix bonding, inter-filler space, morphology, and mesoscopic interaction.",
    author = "Masahiro Kozako and Ryoichi Kido and Norikazu Fuse and Yoshimichi Ohki and Tatsuki Okamoto and Toshikatsu Tanaka",
    year = "2004",
    language = "English",
    pages = "398--401",
    booktitle = "Annual Report - Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, CEIDP",

    }

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Difference in surface degradation due to partial discharges between polyamide nanocomposite and microcomposite

    AU - Kozako, Masahiro

    AU - Kido, Ryoichi

    AU - Fuse, Norikazu

    AU - Ohki, Yoshimichi

    AU - Okamoto, Tatsuki

    AU - Tanaka, Toshikatsu

    PY - 2004

    Y1 - 2004

    N2 - Partial discharge (PD) degradation was investigated to compare polyamide nanocomposites with two kinds of polyamide microcomposites. Such materials were exposed to PDs under the IEC(b) electrode configuration for evaluation of PD resistance. Comparisons were made as to the surface roughness using a scanning electron microscope, an atomic force microscope, and a mechanical surface profilometer. It is concluded that polyamide nanocomposite is more resistant to PDs than microcomposites, and that nanoeffects would work against PD degradation, which include filler-matrix bonding, inter-filler space, morphology, and mesoscopic interaction.

    AB - Partial discharge (PD) degradation was investigated to compare polyamide nanocomposites with two kinds of polyamide microcomposites. Such materials were exposed to PDs under the IEC(b) electrode configuration for evaluation of PD resistance. Comparisons were made as to the surface roughness using a scanning electron microscope, an atomic force microscope, and a mechanical surface profilometer. It is concluded that polyamide nanocomposite is more resistant to PDs than microcomposites, and that nanoeffects would work against PD degradation, which include filler-matrix bonding, inter-filler space, morphology, and mesoscopic interaction.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17744397111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17744397111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Conference contribution

    AN - SCOPUS:17744397111

    SP - 398

    EP - 401

    BT - Annual Report - Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, CEIDP

    ER -