Differences in body density and percent body fat found by different methods of evaluating body composition

Kayo Shitara, Noriko Hakamada, Takahiro Ohnishi, Tatsuaki Ikeda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The objectives of this study were 1) to quantify the differences in body densities and percent body fat using various methods for evaluating body composition (e.g., underwater weighing (UWW), air displacement plethysmography (ADP), skinfold caliper (SKF) measurement, ultrasound (US), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)), and 2) to examine the relationship between trends of the differences in body density and percent body fat obtained by these methods and characteristics of morphology and body composition. To this end, the body compositions of 73 healthy male adults were measured using UWW, ADP, SKF, US, and BIA. Twenty-seven of these 73 subjects underwent further measurement using DXA. Differences in body densities determined with ADP, SKF, and US were compared with those measured using UWW as a reference, and the differences in percent body fat estimated with UWW, ADP, SKF, US and BIA were compared with those measured by DXA as a reference. The results of this study indicate that 1) ADP is useful as a method for evaluating body density, as the results differed insignificantly from the reference method and showed no systematic errors due to differences in morphological characteristics and body composition, and 2) UWW measurements exhibited the smallest difference in percent body fat from the reference method, however, more than in any other method, there were systematic errors due to differences in morphological characteristics and body composition, specifically, trunk composition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)369-382
Number of pages14
JournalJapanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine
Volume66
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Sep 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Body Composition
Plethysmography
Adipose Tissue
Air
Electric Impedance
X-Rays

Keywords

  • Body composition
  • Body density
  • Percent body fat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Differences in body density and percent body fat found by different methods of evaluating body composition. / Shitara, Kayo; Hakamada, Noriko; Ohnishi, Takahiro; Ikeda, Tatsuaki.

In: Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine, Vol. 66, No. 5, 01.09.2017, p. 369-382.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shitara, Kayo ; Hakamada, Noriko ; Ohnishi, Takahiro ; Ikeda, Tatsuaki. / Differences in body density and percent body fat found by different methods of evaluating body composition. In: Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 66, No. 5. pp. 369-382.
@article{deb2a80971bd4bcc946956734d29b845,
title = "Differences in body density and percent body fat found by different methods of evaluating body composition",
abstract = "The objectives of this study were 1) to quantify the differences in body densities and percent body fat using various methods for evaluating body composition (e.g., underwater weighing (UWW), air displacement plethysmography (ADP), skinfold caliper (SKF) measurement, ultrasound (US), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)), and 2) to examine the relationship between trends of the differences in body density and percent body fat obtained by these methods and characteristics of morphology and body composition. To this end, the body compositions of 73 healthy male adults were measured using UWW, ADP, SKF, US, and BIA. Twenty-seven of these 73 subjects underwent further measurement using DXA. Differences in body densities determined with ADP, SKF, and US were compared with those measured using UWW as a reference, and the differences in percent body fat estimated with UWW, ADP, SKF, US and BIA were compared with those measured by DXA as a reference. The results of this study indicate that 1) ADP is useful as a method for evaluating body density, as the results differed insignificantly from the reference method and showed no systematic errors due to differences in morphological characteristics and body composition, and 2) UWW measurements exhibited the smallest difference in percent body fat from the reference method, however, more than in any other method, there were systematic errors due to differences in morphological characteristics and body composition, specifically, trunk composition.",
keywords = "Body composition, Body density, Percent body fat",
author = "Kayo Shitara and Noriko Hakamada and Takahiro Ohnishi and Tatsuaki Ikeda",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7600/jspfsm.66.369",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "369--382",
journal = "Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine",
issn = "0039-906X",
publisher = "Japanese Society of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in body density and percent body fat found by different methods of evaluating body composition

AU - Shitara, Kayo

AU - Hakamada, Noriko

AU - Ohnishi, Takahiro

AU - Ikeda, Tatsuaki

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - The objectives of this study were 1) to quantify the differences in body densities and percent body fat using various methods for evaluating body composition (e.g., underwater weighing (UWW), air displacement plethysmography (ADP), skinfold caliper (SKF) measurement, ultrasound (US), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)), and 2) to examine the relationship between trends of the differences in body density and percent body fat obtained by these methods and characteristics of morphology and body composition. To this end, the body compositions of 73 healthy male adults were measured using UWW, ADP, SKF, US, and BIA. Twenty-seven of these 73 subjects underwent further measurement using DXA. Differences in body densities determined with ADP, SKF, and US were compared with those measured using UWW as a reference, and the differences in percent body fat estimated with UWW, ADP, SKF, US and BIA were compared with those measured by DXA as a reference. The results of this study indicate that 1) ADP is useful as a method for evaluating body density, as the results differed insignificantly from the reference method and showed no systematic errors due to differences in morphological characteristics and body composition, and 2) UWW measurements exhibited the smallest difference in percent body fat from the reference method, however, more than in any other method, there were systematic errors due to differences in morphological characteristics and body composition, specifically, trunk composition.

AB - The objectives of this study were 1) to quantify the differences in body densities and percent body fat using various methods for evaluating body composition (e.g., underwater weighing (UWW), air displacement plethysmography (ADP), skinfold caliper (SKF) measurement, ultrasound (US), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)), and 2) to examine the relationship between trends of the differences in body density and percent body fat obtained by these methods and characteristics of morphology and body composition. To this end, the body compositions of 73 healthy male adults were measured using UWW, ADP, SKF, US, and BIA. Twenty-seven of these 73 subjects underwent further measurement using DXA. Differences in body densities determined with ADP, SKF, and US were compared with those measured using UWW as a reference, and the differences in percent body fat estimated with UWW, ADP, SKF, US and BIA were compared with those measured by DXA as a reference. The results of this study indicate that 1) ADP is useful as a method for evaluating body density, as the results differed insignificantly from the reference method and showed no systematic errors due to differences in morphological characteristics and body composition, and 2) UWW measurements exhibited the smallest difference in percent body fat from the reference method, however, more than in any other method, there were systematic errors due to differences in morphological characteristics and body composition, specifically, trunk composition.

KW - Body composition

KW - Body density

KW - Percent body fat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030167637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030167637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7600/jspfsm.66.369

DO - 10.7600/jspfsm.66.369

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 369

EP - 382

JO - Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine

JF - Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine

SN - 0039-906X

IS - 5

ER -