Differential neuroethological effects of aversive and appetitive reinforcing stimuli on associative learning in Lymnaea stagnalis

S. Kojima, M. Yamanaka, Y. Fujito, Etsuro Ito

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is necessary to determine whether, in the same species and for the same behavior, aversive and appetitive conditioning yield different strengths and periods of either acquisition or retention. To this end, we first examined the effects of various chemo-sensory and physical stimuli on feeding and avoidance behavioral responses in the pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis. Then, using these findings, we constructed classical-conditioning paradigms with aversive and appetitive stimuli. In the aversive conditioning paradigm, an appetitive stimulus (sucrose), which increased the feeding response, was paired with an aversive stimulus (KCl, quinidine sulfate or electric shock), which inhibited the feeding behavior. Upon presentation of KCl, the first type of aversive conditioning, which is generally called 'taste-aversion learning with cessation of feeding response', was acquired quickly and persisted for up to a month. When using a noxious stimulus (quinidine sulfate or electric shock) inducing pain we additionally found the second type of aversive conditioning, in which the previously appetitive stimulus (sucrose) not only failed to increase the feeding response, but came to elicit an avoidance response. This second type conditioning took longer to acquire and persisted for a shorter period of time than the first type. On the other hand, the appetitive conditioning paradigm paired a neutral stimulus (vibratory) with an appetitive stimulus (sucrose). The strength and period for acquisition and retention of this appetitive learned response were very similar to those of the second type aversive conditioning but not to the first one. On the basis of these behavioral analyses, the neuronal mechanisms of the two types of aversive and appetitive conditioning were discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)803-812
Number of pages10
JournalZoological Science
Volume13
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lymnaea stagnalis
conditioned behavior
learning
quinidine
sucrose
sulfates
feeding behavior
snails
pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Differential neuroethological effects of aversive and appetitive reinforcing stimuli on associative learning in Lymnaea stagnalis. / Kojima, S.; Yamanaka, M.; Fujito, Y.; Ito, Etsuro.

In: Zoological Science, Vol. 13, No. 6, 1996, p. 803-812.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f6f598764cd34abf9528b02c0278be05,
title = "Differential neuroethological effects of aversive and appetitive reinforcing stimuli on associative learning in Lymnaea stagnalis",
abstract = "It is necessary to determine whether, in the same species and for the same behavior, aversive and appetitive conditioning yield different strengths and periods of either acquisition or retention. To this end, we first examined the effects of various chemo-sensory and physical stimuli on feeding and avoidance behavioral responses in the pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis. Then, using these findings, we constructed classical-conditioning paradigms with aversive and appetitive stimuli. In the aversive conditioning paradigm, an appetitive stimulus (sucrose), which increased the feeding response, was paired with an aversive stimulus (KCl, quinidine sulfate or electric shock), which inhibited the feeding behavior. Upon presentation of KCl, the first type of aversive conditioning, which is generally called 'taste-aversion learning with cessation of feeding response', was acquired quickly and persisted for up to a month. When using a noxious stimulus (quinidine sulfate or electric shock) inducing pain we additionally found the second type of aversive conditioning, in which the previously appetitive stimulus (sucrose) not only failed to increase the feeding response, but came to elicit an avoidance response. This second type conditioning took longer to acquire and persisted for a shorter period of time than the first type. On the other hand, the appetitive conditioning paradigm paired a neutral stimulus (vibratory) with an appetitive stimulus (sucrose). The strength and period for acquisition and retention of this appetitive learned response were very similar to those of the second type aversive conditioning but not to the first one. On the basis of these behavioral analyses, the neuronal mechanisms of the two types of aversive and appetitive conditioning were discussed.",
author = "S. Kojima and M. Yamanaka and Y. Fujito and Etsuro Ito",
year = "1996",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "803--812",
journal = "Zoological Science",
issn = "0289-0003",
publisher = "Zoological Society of Japan",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential neuroethological effects of aversive and appetitive reinforcing stimuli on associative learning in Lymnaea stagnalis

AU - Kojima, S.

AU - Yamanaka, M.

AU - Fujito, Y.

AU - Ito, Etsuro

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - It is necessary to determine whether, in the same species and for the same behavior, aversive and appetitive conditioning yield different strengths and periods of either acquisition or retention. To this end, we first examined the effects of various chemo-sensory and physical stimuli on feeding and avoidance behavioral responses in the pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis. Then, using these findings, we constructed classical-conditioning paradigms with aversive and appetitive stimuli. In the aversive conditioning paradigm, an appetitive stimulus (sucrose), which increased the feeding response, was paired with an aversive stimulus (KCl, quinidine sulfate or electric shock), which inhibited the feeding behavior. Upon presentation of KCl, the first type of aversive conditioning, which is generally called 'taste-aversion learning with cessation of feeding response', was acquired quickly and persisted for up to a month. When using a noxious stimulus (quinidine sulfate or electric shock) inducing pain we additionally found the second type of aversive conditioning, in which the previously appetitive stimulus (sucrose) not only failed to increase the feeding response, but came to elicit an avoidance response. This second type conditioning took longer to acquire and persisted for a shorter period of time than the first type. On the other hand, the appetitive conditioning paradigm paired a neutral stimulus (vibratory) with an appetitive stimulus (sucrose). The strength and period for acquisition and retention of this appetitive learned response were very similar to those of the second type aversive conditioning but not to the first one. On the basis of these behavioral analyses, the neuronal mechanisms of the two types of aversive and appetitive conditioning were discussed.

AB - It is necessary to determine whether, in the same species and for the same behavior, aversive and appetitive conditioning yield different strengths and periods of either acquisition or retention. To this end, we first examined the effects of various chemo-sensory and physical stimuli on feeding and avoidance behavioral responses in the pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis. Then, using these findings, we constructed classical-conditioning paradigms with aversive and appetitive stimuli. In the aversive conditioning paradigm, an appetitive stimulus (sucrose), which increased the feeding response, was paired with an aversive stimulus (KCl, quinidine sulfate or electric shock), which inhibited the feeding behavior. Upon presentation of KCl, the first type of aversive conditioning, which is generally called 'taste-aversion learning with cessation of feeding response', was acquired quickly and persisted for up to a month. When using a noxious stimulus (quinidine sulfate or electric shock) inducing pain we additionally found the second type of aversive conditioning, in which the previously appetitive stimulus (sucrose) not only failed to increase the feeding response, but came to elicit an avoidance response. This second type conditioning took longer to acquire and persisted for a shorter period of time than the first type. On the other hand, the appetitive conditioning paradigm paired a neutral stimulus (vibratory) with an appetitive stimulus (sucrose). The strength and period for acquisition and retention of this appetitive learned response were very similar to those of the second type aversive conditioning but not to the first one. On the basis of these behavioral analyses, the neuronal mechanisms of the two types of aversive and appetitive conditioning were discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030435650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030435650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 803

EP - 812

JO - Zoological Science

JF - Zoological Science

SN - 0289-0003

IS - 6

ER -