Differing dynamics of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination: Two-finger and four-finger tapping experiments

Kentaro Kodama, Nobuhiro Furuyama, Tetsunari Inamura

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Finger-tapping experiments were conducted to examine whether the dynamics of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems can be described equally by the Haken - Kelso - Bunz model, which describes inter-limb coordination dynamics. This article reports the results of finger-tapping experiments conducted in both systems. Two within-subject factors were investigated: the phase mode and the number of fingers. In the intrapersonal experiment (Experiment 1), the participants were asked to tap, paced by a gradually hastening auditory metronome, looking at their fingers moving, using the index finger in the two finger condition, or the index and middle finger in the four-finger condition. In the interpersonal experiment (Experiment 2), pairs of participants performed the task while each participant used the outside hand, tapping with the index finger in the two finger condition, or the index and middle finger in the four-finger condition. Some results did not agree with the HKB model predictions. First, from Experiment 1, no significant difference was observed in the movement stability between the in-phase and anti-phase modes in the two finger condition. Second, from Experiment 2, no significant difference was found in the movement stability between the in-phase and anti-phase mode in the four-finger condition. From these findings, different coordination dynamics were inferred between intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems against prediction from the previous studies. Results were discussed according to differences between intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems in the availability of perceptual information and the complexity in the interaction between limbs derived from a nested structure.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere0129358
    JournalPLoS One
    Volume10
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jun 12

    Fingerprint

    Fingers
    limbs (animal)
    prediction
    Experiments
    hands
    Extremities
    Availability
    Hand

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
    • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
    • Medicine(all)

    Cite this

    Differing dynamics of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination : Two-finger and four-finger tapping experiments. / Kodama, Kentaro; Furuyama, Nobuhiro; Inamura, Tetsunari.

    In: PLoS One, Vol. 10, No. 6, e0129358, 12.06.2015.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{b7ea2146eb5342479c675aa4c63230fc,
    title = "Differing dynamics of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination: Two-finger and four-finger tapping experiments",
    abstract = "Finger-tapping experiments were conducted to examine whether the dynamics of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems can be described equally by the Haken - Kelso - Bunz model, which describes inter-limb coordination dynamics. This article reports the results of finger-tapping experiments conducted in both systems. Two within-subject factors were investigated: the phase mode and the number of fingers. In the intrapersonal experiment (Experiment 1), the participants were asked to tap, paced by a gradually hastening auditory metronome, looking at their fingers moving, using the index finger in the two finger condition, or the index and middle finger in the four-finger condition. In the interpersonal experiment (Experiment 2), pairs of participants performed the task while each participant used the outside hand, tapping with the index finger in the two finger condition, or the index and middle finger in the four-finger condition. Some results did not agree with the HKB model predictions. First, from Experiment 1, no significant difference was observed in the movement stability between the in-phase and anti-phase modes in the two finger condition. Second, from Experiment 2, no significant difference was found in the movement stability between the in-phase and anti-phase mode in the four-finger condition. From these findings, different coordination dynamics were inferred between intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems against prediction from the previous studies. Results were discussed according to differences between intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems in the availability of perceptual information and the complexity in the interaction between limbs derived from a nested structure.",
    author = "Kentaro Kodama and Nobuhiro Furuyama and Tetsunari Inamura",
    year = "2015",
    month = "6",
    day = "12",
    doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0129358",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    journal = "PLoS One",
    issn = "1932-6203",
    publisher = "Public Library of Science",
    number = "6",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Differing dynamics of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination

    T2 - Two-finger and four-finger tapping experiments

    AU - Kodama, Kentaro

    AU - Furuyama, Nobuhiro

    AU - Inamura, Tetsunari

    PY - 2015/6/12

    Y1 - 2015/6/12

    N2 - Finger-tapping experiments were conducted to examine whether the dynamics of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems can be described equally by the Haken - Kelso - Bunz model, which describes inter-limb coordination dynamics. This article reports the results of finger-tapping experiments conducted in both systems. Two within-subject factors were investigated: the phase mode and the number of fingers. In the intrapersonal experiment (Experiment 1), the participants were asked to tap, paced by a gradually hastening auditory metronome, looking at their fingers moving, using the index finger in the two finger condition, or the index and middle finger in the four-finger condition. In the interpersonal experiment (Experiment 2), pairs of participants performed the task while each participant used the outside hand, tapping with the index finger in the two finger condition, or the index and middle finger in the four-finger condition. Some results did not agree with the HKB model predictions. First, from Experiment 1, no significant difference was observed in the movement stability between the in-phase and anti-phase modes in the two finger condition. Second, from Experiment 2, no significant difference was found in the movement stability between the in-phase and anti-phase mode in the four-finger condition. From these findings, different coordination dynamics were inferred between intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems against prediction from the previous studies. Results were discussed according to differences between intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems in the availability of perceptual information and the complexity in the interaction between limbs derived from a nested structure.

    AB - Finger-tapping experiments were conducted to examine whether the dynamics of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems can be described equally by the Haken - Kelso - Bunz model, which describes inter-limb coordination dynamics. This article reports the results of finger-tapping experiments conducted in both systems. Two within-subject factors were investigated: the phase mode and the number of fingers. In the intrapersonal experiment (Experiment 1), the participants were asked to tap, paced by a gradually hastening auditory metronome, looking at their fingers moving, using the index finger in the two finger condition, or the index and middle finger in the four-finger condition. In the interpersonal experiment (Experiment 2), pairs of participants performed the task while each participant used the outside hand, tapping with the index finger in the two finger condition, or the index and middle finger in the four-finger condition. Some results did not agree with the HKB model predictions. First, from Experiment 1, no significant difference was observed in the movement stability between the in-phase and anti-phase modes in the two finger condition. Second, from Experiment 2, no significant difference was found in the movement stability between the in-phase and anti-phase mode in the four-finger condition. From these findings, different coordination dynamics were inferred between intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems against prediction from the previous studies. Results were discussed according to differences between intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems in the availability of perceptual information and the complexity in the interaction between limbs derived from a nested structure.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936095309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84936095309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0129358

    DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0129358

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 26070119

    AN - SCOPUS:84936095309

    VL - 10

    JO - PLoS One

    JF - PLoS One

    SN - 1932-6203

    IS - 6

    M1 - e0129358

    ER -