Discourse expectations and relative clause processing

Douglas William Roland, Gail Mauner, Carolyn O'Meara, Hongoak Yun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated the role of discourse context in relative clause processing. We first replicated Reali and Christiansen's (2007a) finding that pronominal object relative clauses are easier to process than analogous subject relative clauses (an effect which stands in contrast to previous research on pronominal relative clauses). We then analyzed corpus data to demonstrate that the embedded noun phrase in object relative clauses nearly always has a discourse-old referent, even if the noun phrase is not pronominal, while the referent of the embedded noun phrase in subject relative clauses is typically discourse-new. We then extended the work of Mak et al. (2008), by demonstrating in region-by-region reading that full noun phrase object relative clauses are not more difficult to process than subject relatives when they are preceded by appropriate discourse contexts. Finally, we reanalyzed data from the Dundee Eye-tracking corpus to show that contra Demberg and Keller (2007), naturally occurring object relatives are no harder to process than subject relatives. We conclude that the processing difficulties associated with object as compared to subject relative clauses arises because object relative clauses violate more discourse expectations in typical experimental contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)479-508
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume66
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Apr 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reading
discourse
Processing
Research
Discourse
Relative Clauses
Noun Phrase
Pronominal

Keywords

  • Constrain-based approach
  • Corpus analysis
  • Discourse
  • Relative clause
  • Sentence processing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Discourse expectations and relative clause processing. / Roland, Douglas William; Mauner, Gail; O'Meara, Carolyn; Yun, Hongoak.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 66, No. 3, 01.04.2012, p. 479-508.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roland, Douglas William ; Mauner, Gail ; O'Meara, Carolyn ; Yun, Hongoak. / Discourse expectations and relative clause processing. In: Journal of Memory and Language. 2012 ; Vol. 66, No. 3. pp. 479-508.
@article{3f7ac94380054490a80284744abbddb4,
title = "Discourse expectations and relative clause processing",
abstract = "We investigated the role of discourse context in relative clause processing. We first replicated Reali and Christiansen's (2007a) finding that pronominal object relative clauses are easier to process than analogous subject relative clauses (an effect which stands in contrast to previous research on pronominal relative clauses). We then analyzed corpus data to demonstrate that the embedded noun phrase in object relative clauses nearly always has a discourse-old referent, even if the noun phrase is not pronominal, while the referent of the embedded noun phrase in subject relative clauses is typically discourse-new. We then extended the work of Mak et al. (2008), by demonstrating in region-by-region reading that full noun phrase object relative clauses are not more difficult to process than subject relatives when they are preceded by appropriate discourse contexts. Finally, we reanalyzed data from the Dundee Eye-tracking corpus to show that contra Demberg and Keller (2007), naturally occurring object relatives are no harder to process than subject relatives. We conclude that the processing difficulties associated with object as compared to subject relative clauses arises because object relative clauses violate more discourse expectations in typical experimental contexts.",
keywords = "Constrain-based approach, Corpus analysis, Discourse, Relative clause, Sentence processing",
author = "Roland, {Douglas William} and Gail Mauner and Carolyn O'Meara and Hongoak Yun",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.004",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "479--508",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discourse expectations and relative clause processing

AU - Roland, Douglas William

AU - Mauner, Gail

AU - O'Meara, Carolyn

AU - Yun, Hongoak

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - We investigated the role of discourse context in relative clause processing. We first replicated Reali and Christiansen's (2007a) finding that pronominal object relative clauses are easier to process than analogous subject relative clauses (an effect which stands in contrast to previous research on pronominal relative clauses). We then analyzed corpus data to demonstrate that the embedded noun phrase in object relative clauses nearly always has a discourse-old referent, even if the noun phrase is not pronominal, while the referent of the embedded noun phrase in subject relative clauses is typically discourse-new. We then extended the work of Mak et al. (2008), by demonstrating in region-by-region reading that full noun phrase object relative clauses are not more difficult to process than subject relatives when they are preceded by appropriate discourse contexts. Finally, we reanalyzed data from the Dundee Eye-tracking corpus to show that contra Demberg and Keller (2007), naturally occurring object relatives are no harder to process than subject relatives. We conclude that the processing difficulties associated with object as compared to subject relative clauses arises because object relative clauses violate more discourse expectations in typical experimental contexts.

AB - We investigated the role of discourse context in relative clause processing. We first replicated Reali and Christiansen's (2007a) finding that pronominal object relative clauses are easier to process than analogous subject relative clauses (an effect which stands in contrast to previous research on pronominal relative clauses). We then analyzed corpus data to demonstrate that the embedded noun phrase in object relative clauses nearly always has a discourse-old referent, even if the noun phrase is not pronominal, while the referent of the embedded noun phrase in subject relative clauses is typically discourse-new. We then extended the work of Mak et al. (2008), by demonstrating in region-by-region reading that full noun phrase object relative clauses are not more difficult to process than subject relatives when they are preceded by appropriate discourse contexts. Finally, we reanalyzed data from the Dundee Eye-tracking corpus to show that contra Demberg and Keller (2007), naturally occurring object relatives are no harder to process than subject relatives. We conclude that the processing difficulties associated with object as compared to subject relative clauses arises because object relative clauses violate more discourse expectations in typical experimental contexts.

KW - Constrain-based approach

KW - Corpus analysis

KW - Discourse

KW - Relative clause

KW - Sentence processing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857654844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857654844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84857654844

VL - 66

SP - 479

EP - 508

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

IS - 3

ER -