Do multi-stakeholder initiatives make for better CSR?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to examine the significance and challenges of corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives organized by multi-stakeholders and to clarify the function of CSR initiatives: What is the significance of multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs)? What conditions are required for CSR initiatives to work satisfactorily? How do CSR standards function effectively in companies? Design/methodology/approach: The significance and challenges of multi-stakeholder CSR initiatives are clarified theoretically, based on previous literature from relevant research fields. Findings: MSIs are beyond the “dichotomy” of two traditional approaches to CSR, namely, voluntary vs mandatory. However MSIs do not automatically ensure good performance. We should discuss not only the legitimacy of MSIs but external monitoring and evaluation systems for responsible companies in the market, as well as organizational efforts to incorporate CSR standards into managerial processes. Social implications: This paper shows that an MSI is an important platform for establishing and promoting a CSR standard, and further that market maturity and stakeholder engagement are required to make CSR work. Originality/value: The study explains that ceremonial compliance with CSR standards may be inevitable even where the legitimacy of an MSI is secured, and that we should recognize that monitoring and sanction systems in the market and an organizational approach to the incorporation of CSR in management practices are required.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCorporate Governance (Bingley)
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Stakeholders
Corporate Social Responsibility
Legitimacy
Stakeholder engagement
Monitoring and evaluation
Dichotomy
External monitoring
Design methodology
Field research
Monitoring
Monitoring system
Evaluation system
Sanctions
Maturity
Management practices

Keywords

  • CSR initiative
  • Global Governance
  • Legitimacy
  • Market maturity
  • Multi-stakeholder
  • Stakeholder engagement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Do multi-stakeholder initiatives make for better CSR? / Tanimoto, Kanji.

In: Corporate Governance (Bingley), 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{675c0834f5ee46b1a698a53a3d9af0fc,
title = "Do multi-stakeholder initiatives make for better CSR?",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper aims to examine the significance and challenges of corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives organized by multi-stakeholders and to clarify the function of CSR initiatives: What is the significance of multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs)? What conditions are required for CSR initiatives to work satisfactorily? How do CSR standards function effectively in companies? Design/methodology/approach: The significance and challenges of multi-stakeholder CSR initiatives are clarified theoretically, based on previous literature from relevant research fields. Findings: MSIs are beyond the “dichotomy” of two traditional approaches to CSR, namely, voluntary vs mandatory. However MSIs do not automatically ensure good performance. We should discuss not only the legitimacy of MSIs but external monitoring and evaluation systems for responsible companies in the market, as well as organizational efforts to incorporate CSR standards into managerial processes. Social implications: This paper shows that an MSI is an important platform for establishing and promoting a CSR standard, and further that market maturity and stakeholder engagement are required to make CSR work. Originality/value: The study explains that ceremonial compliance with CSR standards may be inevitable even where the legitimacy of an MSI is secured, and that we should recognize that monitoring and sanction systems in the market and an organizational approach to the incorporation of CSR in management practices are required.",
keywords = "CSR initiative, Global Governance, Legitimacy, Market maturity, Multi-stakeholder, Stakeholder engagement",
author = "Kanji Tanimoto",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/CG-08-2018-0267",
language = "English",
journal = "Corporate Governance (Bingley)",
issn = "1472-0701",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do multi-stakeholder initiatives make for better CSR?

AU - Tanimoto, Kanji

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose: This paper aims to examine the significance and challenges of corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives organized by multi-stakeholders and to clarify the function of CSR initiatives: What is the significance of multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs)? What conditions are required for CSR initiatives to work satisfactorily? How do CSR standards function effectively in companies? Design/methodology/approach: The significance and challenges of multi-stakeholder CSR initiatives are clarified theoretically, based on previous literature from relevant research fields. Findings: MSIs are beyond the “dichotomy” of two traditional approaches to CSR, namely, voluntary vs mandatory. However MSIs do not automatically ensure good performance. We should discuss not only the legitimacy of MSIs but external monitoring and evaluation systems for responsible companies in the market, as well as organizational efforts to incorporate CSR standards into managerial processes. Social implications: This paper shows that an MSI is an important platform for establishing and promoting a CSR standard, and further that market maturity and stakeholder engagement are required to make CSR work. Originality/value: The study explains that ceremonial compliance with CSR standards may be inevitable even where the legitimacy of an MSI is secured, and that we should recognize that monitoring and sanction systems in the market and an organizational approach to the incorporation of CSR in management practices are required.

AB - Purpose: This paper aims to examine the significance and challenges of corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives organized by multi-stakeholders and to clarify the function of CSR initiatives: What is the significance of multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs)? What conditions are required for CSR initiatives to work satisfactorily? How do CSR standards function effectively in companies? Design/methodology/approach: The significance and challenges of multi-stakeholder CSR initiatives are clarified theoretically, based on previous literature from relevant research fields. Findings: MSIs are beyond the “dichotomy” of two traditional approaches to CSR, namely, voluntary vs mandatory. However MSIs do not automatically ensure good performance. We should discuss not only the legitimacy of MSIs but external monitoring and evaluation systems for responsible companies in the market, as well as organizational efforts to incorporate CSR standards into managerial processes. Social implications: This paper shows that an MSI is an important platform for establishing and promoting a CSR standard, and further that market maturity and stakeholder engagement are required to make CSR work. Originality/value: The study explains that ceremonial compliance with CSR standards may be inevitable even where the legitimacy of an MSI is secured, and that we should recognize that monitoring and sanction systems in the market and an organizational approach to the incorporation of CSR in management practices are required.

KW - CSR initiative

KW - Global Governance

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Market maturity

KW - Multi-stakeholder

KW - Stakeholder engagement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068107992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068107992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/CG-08-2018-0267

DO - 10.1108/CG-08-2018-0267

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85068107992

JO - Corporate Governance (Bingley)

JF - Corporate Governance (Bingley)

SN - 1472-0701

ER -