Do we know others' visual liking?

Ryosuke Niimi, Katsumi Watanabe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although personal liking varies considerably, there is a general trend of liking shared by many people (public favour). Visual liking in particular may be largely shared by people, as it is strongly influenced by relatively low-level perceptual factors. If so, it is likely that people have correct knowledge of public favour. We examined the human ability to predict public favour. In three experiments, participants rated the subjective likability of various visual objects (e.g. car, chair), and predicted the mean liking rating by other participants. Irrespective of the object's category, the correlation between individual prediction and actual mean liking of others (prediction validity) was not higher than the correlation between the predictor's own liking and the mean liking of others. Further, individual prediction correlated more with the predictor's own liking than it was with others' liking. Namely, predictions were biased towards the predictor's subjective liking (a variation of the false consensus effect). The results suggest that humans do not have (or cannot access) correct knowledge of public favour. It was suggested that increasing the number of predictors is the appropriate strategy for making a good prediction of public favour.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)572-584
Number of pages13
Journali-Perception
Volume5
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Railroad cars
Experiments

Keywords

  • Aesthetics
  • False consensus effect
  • Gender difference
  • Object perception
  • Preference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Do we know others' visual liking? / Niimi, Ryosuke; Watanabe, Katsumi.

In: i-Perception, Vol. 5, No. 7, 2014, p. 572-584.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Niimi, Ryosuke ; Watanabe, Katsumi. / Do we know others' visual liking?. In: i-Perception. 2014 ; Vol. 5, No. 7. pp. 572-584.
@article{eb85687891b340afab579bf1678dd210,
title = "Do we know others' visual liking?",
abstract = "Although personal liking varies considerably, there is a general trend of liking shared by many people (public favour). Visual liking in particular may be largely shared by people, as it is strongly influenced by relatively low-level perceptual factors. If so, it is likely that people have correct knowledge of public favour. We examined the human ability to predict public favour. In three experiments, participants rated the subjective likability of various visual objects (e.g. car, chair), and predicted the mean liking rating by other participants. Irrespective of the object's category, the correlation between individual prediction and actual mean liking of others (prediction validity) was not higher than the correlation between the predictor's own liking and the mean liking of others. Further, individual prediction correlated more with the predictor's own liking than it was with others' liking. Namely, predictions were biased towards the predictor's subjective liking (a variation of the false consensus effect). The results suggest that humans do not have (or cannot access) correct knowledge of public favour. It was suggested that increasing the number of predictors is the appropriate strategy for making a good prediction of public favour.",
keywords = "Aesthetics, False consensus effect, Gender difference, Object perception, Preference",
author = "Ryosuke Niimi and Katsumi Watanabe",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1068/i0661",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "572--584",
journal = "i-Perception",
issn = "2041-6695",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do we know others' visual liking?

AU - Niimi, Ryosuke

AU - Watanabe, Katsumi

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Although personal liking varies considerably, there is a general trend of liking shared by many people (public favour). Visual liking in particular may be largely shared by people, as it is strongly influenced by relatively low-level perceptual factors. If so, it is likely that people have correct knowledge of public favour. We examined the human ability to predict public favour. In three experiments, participants rated the subjective likability of various visual objects (e.g. car, chair), and predicted the mean liking rating by other participants. Irrespective of the object's category, the correlation between individual prediction and actual mean liking of others (prediction validity) was not higher than the correlation between the predictor's own liking and the mean liking of others. Further, individual prediction correlated more with the predictor's own liking than it was with others' liking. Namely, predictions were biased towards the predictor's subjective liking (a variation of the false consensus effect). The results suggest that humans do not have (or cannot access) correct knowledge of public favour. It was suggested that increasing the number of predictors is the appropriate strategy for making a good prediction of public favour.

AB - Although personal liking varies considerably, there is a general trend of liking shared by many people (public favour). Visual liking in particular may be largely shared by people, as it is strongly influenced by relatively low-level perceptual factors. If so, it is likely that people have correct knowledge of public favour. We examined the human ability to predict public favour. In three experiments, participants rated the subjective likability of various visual objects (e.g. car, chair), and predicted the mean liking rating by other participants. Irrespective of the object's category, the correlation between individual prediction and actual mean liking of others (prediction validity) was not higher than the correlation between the predictor's own liking and the mean liking of others. Further, individual prediction correlated more with the predictor's own liking than it was with others' liking. Namely, predictions were biased towards the predictor's subjective liking (a variation of the false consensus effect). The results suggest that humans do not have (or cannot access) correct knowledge of public favour. It was suggested that increasing the number of predictors is the appropriate strategy for making a good prediction of public favour.

KW - Aesthetics

KW - False consensus effect

KW - Gender difference

KW - Object perception

KW - Preference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919662082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919662082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1068/i0661

DO - 10.1068/i0661

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84919662082

VL - 5

SP - 572

EP - 584

JO - i-Perception

JF - i-Perception

SN - 2041-6695

IS - 7

ER -