Does the Heterogeneity of Project Implementers Affect the Programme Participation of Beneficiaries? Evidence from Rural Cambodia

Ayako Wakano, Hiroyuki Yamada, Daichi Shimamoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study employs the dataset collected for the assessment of a post-harvest technology project in rural Cambodia and focuses on the heterogeneous preferences of project implementers, frequently overlooked in the literature on programme evaluation studies. We focus on the ‘implementer effect’ on the programme participation of the treated farmers. We demonstrate that the heterogeneous programme participation of ordinary farmers could be induced due to heterogeneity in the characteristics of the project staff. In particular, we indicate that the baseline altruism of the project staff, measured by the dictator game, consistently increases the participation rate and the number of participations in the training sessions of beneficiaries. This type of heterogeneity in project staffs’ preferences across treatment sites could be a source of treatment heterogeneity for programmes conducted at a certain cluster level. While few studies have focused on the heterogeneity of programme implementers, our empirical results indicate that the preference of implementers could be a source of treatment heterogeneity and imply the importance of implementation of an actual project.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Development Studies
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2016 May 14

Fingerprint

Cambodia
participation
evidence
staff
farmer
altruism
project
programme
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development

Cite this

Does the Heterogeneity of Project Implementers Affect the Programme Participation of Beneficiaries? Evidence from Rural Cambodia. / Wakano, Ayako; Yamada, Hiroyuki; Shimamoto, Daichi.

In: Journal of Development Studies, 14.05.2016, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c63dbcca86494b3bb3e4e10ad7b7aa22,
title = "Does the Heterogeneity of Project Implementers Affect the Programme Participation of Beneficiaries?: Evidence from Rural Cambodia",
abstract = "This study employs the dataset collected for the assessment of a post-harvest technology project in rural Cambodia and focuses on the heterogeneous preferences of project implementers, frequently overlooked in the literature on programme evaluation studies. We focus on the ‘implementer effect’ on the programme participation of the treated farmers. We demonstrate that the heterogeneous programme participation of ordinary farmers could be induced due to heterogeneity in the characteristics of the project staff. In particular, we indicate that the baseline altruism of the project staff, measured by the dictator game, consistently increases the participation rate and the number of participations in the training sessions of beneficiaries. This type of heterogeneity in project staffs’ preferences across treatment sites could be a source of treatment heterogeneity for programmes conducted at a certain cluster level. While few studies have focused on the heterogeneity of programme implementers, our empirical results indicate that the preference of implementers could be a source of treatment heterogeneity and imply the importance of implementation of an actual project.",
author = "Ayako Wakano and Hiroyuki Yamada and Daichi Shimamoto",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1080/00220388.2016.1171847",
language = "English",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Journal of Development Studies",
issn = "0022-0388",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does the Heterogeneity of Project Implementers Affect the Programme Participation of Beneficiaries?

T2 - Evidence from Rural Cambodia

AU - Wakano, Ayako

AU - Yamada, Hiroyuki

AU - Shimamoto, Daichi

PY - 2016/5/14

Y1 - 2016/5/14

N2 - This study employs the dataset collected for the assessment of a post-harvest technology project in rural Cambodia and focuses on the heterogeneous preferences of project implementers, frequently overlooked in the literature on programme evaluation studies. We focus on the ‘implementer effect’ on the programme participation of the treated farmers. We demonstrate that the heterogeneous programme participation of ordinary farmers could be induced due to heterogeneity in the characteristics of the project staff. In particular, we indicate that the baseline altruism of the project staff, measured by the dictator game, consistently increases the participation rate and the number of participations in the training sessions of beneficiaries. This type of heterogeneity in project staffs’ preferences across treatment sites could be a source of treatment heterogeneity for programmes conducted at a certain cluster level. While few studies have focused on the heterogeneity of programme implementers, our empirical results indicate that the preference of implementers could be a source of treatment heterogeneity and imply the importance of implementation of an actual project.

AB - This study employs the dataset collected for the assessment of a post-harvest technology project in rural Cambodia and focuses on the heterogeneous preferences of project implementers, frequently overlooked in the literature on programme evaluation studies. We focus on the ‘implementer effect’ on the programme participation of the treated farmers. We demonstrate that the heterogeneous programme participation of ordinary farmers could be induced due to heterogeneity in the characteristics of the project staff. In particular, we indicate that the baseline altruism of the project staff, measured by the dictator game, consistently increases the participation rate and the number of participations in the training sessions of beneficiaries. This type of heterogeneity in project staffs’ preferences across treatment sites could be a source of treatment heterogeneity for programmes conducted at a certain cluster level. While few studies have focused on the heterogeneity of programme implementers, our empirical results indicate that the preference of implementers could be a source of treatment heterogeneity and imply the importance of implementation of an actual project.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969195030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969195030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00220388.2016.1171847

DO - 10.1080/00220388.2016.1171847

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84969195030

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Journal of Development Studies

JF - Journal of Development Studies

SN - 0022-0388

ER -