Dual-task slowing and the effects of cross-task compatibility

Rayna Azuma, Wolfgang Prinz, Iring Koch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that visual encoding requires central processing, evidenced in the form of dual-task interference on response processes of a reaction time (RT) task. We report two experiments examining such dual-task interference: (1) at global level, to establish that visual encoding indeed requires central processing; and (2) at code level, to see whether two tasks may share the same representational codes. To this end, we manipulated the compatibility relation between the response codes for an auditory choice RT task and the stimulus codes for a logically independent visual motion detection task. The results showed significant dual-task slowing of the response for the auditory task, demonstrating the interference at a global level. The effects of cross-task compatibility (CTC) were obtained at the short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA), showing that the RTs were faster for compatible trials. Furthermore, the CTC effect remained even when the visual stimulus did not need to be "consolidated" (Jolicoeur & Dell'Acqua, 1998) for reporting, while the response postponement effect was greatly reduced. We interpret these results as indicating that the present two tasks share both "central" processes and common representational codes, but that these two levels of dual-task interference can be dissociated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)693-713
Number of pages21
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology
Volume57
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004 May
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Dual-task slowing and the effects of cross-task compatibility. / Azuma, Rayna; Prinz, Wolfgang; Koch, Iring.

In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, Vol. 57, No. 4, 05.2004, p. 693-713.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{764b7fc15548459faa164e34de27eb2a,
title = "Dual-task slowing and the effects of cross-task compatibility",
abstract = "Recent studies have shown that visual encoding requires central processing, evidenced in the form of dual-task interference on response processes of a reaction time (RT) task. We report two experiments examining such dual-task interference: (1) at global level, to establish that visual encoding indeed requires central processing; and (2) at code level, to see whether two tasks may share the same representational codes. To this end, we manipulated the compatibility relation between the response codes for an auditory choice RT task and the stimulus codes for a logically independent visual motion detection task. The results showed significant dual-task slowing of the response for the auditory task, demonstrating the interference at a global level. The effects of cross-task compatibility (CTC) were obtained at the short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA), showing that the RTs were faster for compatible trials. Furthermore, the CTC effect remained even when the visual stimulus did not need to be {"}consolidated{"} (Jolicoeur & Dell'Acqua, 1998) for reporting, while the response postponement effect was greatly reduced. We interpret these results as indicating that the present two tasks share both {"}central{"} processes and common representational codes, but that these two levels of dual-task interference can be dissociated.",
author = "Rayna Azuma and Wolfgang Prinz and Iring Koch",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1080/02724980343000459",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "693--713",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology",
issn = "0272-4987",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dual-task slowing and the effects of cross-task compatibility

AU - Azuma, Rayna

AU - Prinz, Wolfgang

AU - Koch, Iring

PY - 2004/5

Y1 - 2004/5

N2 - Recent studies have shown that visual encoding requires central processing, evidenced in the form of dual-task interference on response processes of a reaction time (RT) task. We report two experiments examining such dual-task interference: (1) at global level, to establish that visual encoding indeed requires central processing; and (2) at code level, to see whether two tasks may share the same representational codes. To this end, we manipulated the compatibility relation between the response codes for an auditory choice RT task and the stimulus codes for a logically independent visual motion detection task. The results showed significant dual-task slowing of the response for the auditory task, demonstrating the interference at a global level. The effects of cross-task compatibility (CTC) were obtained at the short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA), showing that the RTs were faster for compatible trials. Furthermore, the CTC effect remained even when the visual stimulus did not need to be "consolidated" (Jolicoeur & Dell'Acqua, 1998) for reporting, while the response postponement effect was greatly reduced. We interpret these results as indicating that the present two tasks share both "central" processes and common representational codes, but that these two levels of dual-task interference can be dissociated.

AB - Recent studies have shown that visual encoding requires central processing, evidenced in the form of dual-task interference on response processes of a reaction time (RT) task. We report two experiments examining such dual-task interference: (1) at global level, to establish that visual encoding indeed requires central processing; and (2) at code level, to see whether two tasks may share the same representational codes. To this end, we manipulated the compatibility relation between the response codes for an auditory choice RT task and the stimulus codes for a logically independent visual motion detection task. The results showed significant dual-task slowing of the response for the auditory task, demonstrating the interference at a global level. The effects of cross-task compatibility (CTC) were obtained at the short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA), showing that the RTs were faster for compatible trials. Furthermore, the CTC effect remained even when the visual stimulus did not need to be "consolidated" (Jolicoeur & Dell'Acqua, 1998) for reporting, while the response postponement effect was greatly reduced. We interpret these results as indicating that the present two tasks share both "central" processes and common representational codes, but that these two levels of dual-task interference can be dissociated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2542541261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2542541261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02724980343000459

DO - 10.1080/02724980343000459

M3 - Article

C2 - 15204129

AN - SCOPUS:2542541261

VL - 57

SP - 693

EP - 713

JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

SN - 0272-4987

IS - 4

ER -