TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of indium and tin additives on the surface morphology of zinc negative electrodes for Zn-Ni flow-assisted batteries
AU - Otani, Tomohiro
AU - Okuma, Takeshi
AU - Homma, Takayuki
N1 - Funding Information:
T. Otani acknowledges the Leading Graduate Program in Science and Engineering, Waseda University from MEXT, Japan.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - The effects of In and Sn additives on the charging behavior of Zn negative electrodes for Zn-Ni flow-assisted batteries were investigated. The addition of InCl3・4H2O or K2SnO3・3H2O to the electrolyte suppressed the formation of mossy shaped Zn, which was highly filamentous electrodeposit and a typical cause of a battery failure. In was effective even at concentrations as low as 1.0 mmol dm−3, while more than 25 mmol dm−3 was required for the case of Sn. The results of ICP-AES measurements indicated that the difference was explained by higher reduced amount of In than that of Sn during the charging process. The In additive did not show any negative effects on the Coulombic and voltaic efficiencies, which was in accordance with the polarization behavior of Zn in the In containing solution; electrodeposited In had high overpotential for hydrogen evolution and minor influences on the Zn deposition potential. From SEM observation at the early stages of electrodeposition, the compact Zn deposits were formed by mitigating the localized deposition on layer-like Zn structures. As a mechanism behind such a uniform deposition by In, a compositional analysis in depth showed deposited In was accumulated at the surface of the deposits.
AB - The effects of In and Sn additives on the charging behavior of Zn negative electrodes for Zn-Ni flow-assisted batteries were investigated. The addition of InCl3・4H2O or K2SnO3・3H2O to the electrolyte suppressed the formation of mossy shaped Zn, which was highly filamentous electrodeposit and a typical cause of a battery failure. In was effective even at concentrations as low as 1.0 mmol dm−3, while more than 25 mmol dm−3 was required for the case of Sn. The results of ICP-AES measurements indicated that the difference was explained by higher reduced amount of In than that of Sn during the charging process. The In additive did not show any negative effects on the Coulombic and voltaic efficiencies, which was in accordance with the polarization behavior of Zn in the In containing solution; electrodeposited In had high overpotential for hydrogen evolution and minor influences on the Zn deposition potential. From SEM observation at the early stages of electrodeposition, the compact Zn deposits were formed by mitigating the localized deposition on layer-like Zn structures. As a mechanism behind such a uniform deposition by In, a compositional analysis in depth showed deposited In was accumulated at the surface of the deposits.
KW - Flow battery
KW - Mossy structure
KW - Zn electrodeposition
KW - Zn-Ni battery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089850820&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089850820&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114583
DO - 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114583
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85089850820
SN - 0022-0728
VL - 878
JO - Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
JF - Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
M1 - 114583
ER -