Effect of voluntary contraction with electrical stimulation antagonist muscle on agonist H-reflex

Tomofumi Yamaguchi, S. Tanabe, T. Watanabe, Yoshihiro Muraoka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Hybrid exercise (HE) was designed to use the force generated by an electrically stimulated antagonist to provide resistance to a volitionally contracting agonist. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the soleus H-reflex before and after HE or conventional resistance exercise (CRE). Methods: The experiments were carried out in 18 healthy subjects (5 men and 13 women; 19-30 yr), who were divided into 2 groups of 9 for each protocol (HE or CRE). The exercise sessions lasted for 15 consecutive minutes. The soleus Hmax/Mmax was measured before and after the HE or the CRE. Results: In the HE group, although there was no significant difference, the soleus Hmax/Mmax after the exercise increased compared with before the exercise (54.7 ± 10.2% to 59.0 ± 14.5%). On the other hand, the soleus Hmax/Mmax decreased in the CRE group (61.8 ± 14.9% to 55.7 ± 16.1%). In the rate of change of the soleus Hmax/Mmax, the result for the HE group was significantly higher than in the CRE group (108.0 ± 11.7% and 89.1 ± 8.0%, respectively) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our results show a clear difference of the neurophysiological mechanism between HE and CRE. Thus, HE might not be an alternative method for CRE.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-255
Number of pages5
JournalElectromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume47
Issue number4-5
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Jul
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

H-Reflex
Electric Stimulation
Exercise
Muscles

Keywords

  • Electrical stimulation
  • H-reflex
  • Resistance exercise
  • Soleus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology

Cite this

Effect of voluntary contraction with electrical stimulation antagonist muscle on agonist H-reflex. / Yamaguchi, Tomofumi; Tanabe, S.; Watanabe, T.; Muraoka, Yoshihiro.

In: Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 47, No. 4-5, 07.2007, p. 251-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4d24dc1873144a26ac8d2b2c9bc9f693,
title = "Effect of voluntary contraction with electrical stimulation antagonist muscle on agonist H-reflex",
abstract = "Objective: Hybrid exercise (HE) was designed to use the force generated by an electrically stimulated antagonist to provide resistance to a volitionally contracting agonist. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the soleus H-reflex before and after HE or conventional resistance exercise (CRE). Methods: The experiments were carried out in 18 healthy subjects (5 men and 13 women; 19-30 yr), who were divided into 2 groups of 9 for each protocol (HE or CRE). The exercise sessions lasted for 15 consecutive minutes. The soleus Hmax/Mmax was measured before and after the HE or the CRE. Results: In the HE group, although there was no significant difference, the soleus Hmax/Mmax after the exercise increased compared with before the exercise (54.7 ± 10.2{\%} to 59.0 ± 14.5{\%}). On the other hand, the soleus Hmax/Mmax decreased in the CRE group (61.8 ± 14.9{\%} to 55.7 ± 16.1{\%}). In the rate of change of the soleus Hmax/Mmax, the result for the HE group was significantly higher than in the CRE group (108.0 ± 11.7{\%} and 89.1 ± 8.0{\%}, respectively) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our results show a clear difference of the neurophysiological mechanism between HE and CRE. Thus, HE might not be an alternative method for CRE.",
keywords = "Electrical stimulation, H-reflex, Resistance exercise, Soleus",
author = "Tomofumi Yamaguchi and S. Tanabe and T. Watanabe and Yoshihiro Muraoka",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "251--255",
journal = "Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "0301-150X",
publisher = "Editions Nauwelaerts SA",
number = "4-5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of voluntary contraction with electrical stimulation antagonist muscle on agonist H-reflex

AU - Yamaguchi, Tomofumi

AU - Tanabe, S.

AU - Watanabe, T.

AU - Muraoka, Yoshihiro

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - Objective: Hybrid exercise (HE) was designed to use the force generated by an electrically stimulated antagonist to provide resistance to a volitionally contracting agonist. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the soleus H-reflex before and after HE or conventional resistance exercise (CRE). Methods: The experiments were carried out in 18 healthy subjects (5 men and 13 women; 19-30 yr), who were divided into 2 groups of 9 for each protocol (HE or CRE). The exercise sessions lasted for 15 consecutive minutes. The soleus Hmax/Mmax was measured before and after the HE or the CRE. Results: In the HE group, although there was no significant difference, the soleus Hmax/Mmax after the exercise increased compared with before the exercise (54.7 ± 10.2% to 59.0 ± 14.5%). On the other hand, the soleus Hmax/Mmax decreased in the CRE group (61.8 ± 14.9% to 55.7 ± 16.1%). In the rate of change of the soleus Hmax/Mmax, the result for the HE group was significantly higher than in the CRE group (108.0 ± 11.7% and 89.1 ± 8.0%, respectively) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our results show a clear difference of the neurophysiological mechanism between HE and CRE. Thus, HE might not be an alternative method for CRE.

AB - Objective: Hybrid exercise (HE) was designed to use the force generated by an electrically stimulated antagonist to provide resistance to a volitionally contracting agonist. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the soleus H-reflex before and after HE or conventional resistance exercise (CRE). Methods: The experiments were carried out in 18 healthy subjects (5 men and 13 women; 19-30 yr), who were divided into 2 groups of 9 for each protocol (HE or CRE). The exercise sessions lasted for 15 consecutive minutes. The soleus Hmax/Mmax was measured before and after the HE or the CRE. Results: In the HE group, although there was no significant difference, the soleus Hmax/Mmax after the exercise increased compared with before the exercise (54.7 ± 10.2% to 59.0 ± 14.5%). On the other hand, the soleus Hmax/Mmax decreased in the CRE group (61.8 ± 14.9% to 55.7 ± 16.1%). In the rate of change of the soleus Hmax/Mmax, the result for the HE group was significantly higher than in the CRE group (108.0 ± 11.7% and 89.1 ± 8.0%, respectively) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our results show a clear difference of the neurophysiological mechanism between HE and CRE. Thus, HE might not be an alternative method for CRE.

KW - Electrical stimulation

KW - H-reflex

KW - Resistance exercise

KW - Soleus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547114016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547114016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 251

EP - 255

JO - Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 0301-150X

IS - 4-5

ER -